Trans-national horizon scanning for invasive non-native species: a case study in western Europe

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Belinda Gallardo ; Alexandra Zieritz ; Tim Adriaens ; Céline Bellard…
• 关键词：Collaborative risk assessment ; Ecological impact ; Invasive potential ; Economic impact ; Management ; Invasive species ; Alert List ; Black List ; Prioritization
• 刊名：Biological Invasions
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：18
• 期：1
• 页码：17-30
• 全文大小：794 KB
• 参考文献：Baker R, Black R, Copp G, Haysom K, Hulme P, Thomas M, Brown A, Brown M, Cannon R, Ellis J (2008) The UK risk assessment scheme for all non-native species. Biological Invasions—from Ecology to Conservation. NEOBIOTA, Berlin, pp 46–57
  Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W (2003) Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Mar Policy 27:313–323CrossRef
  Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Marková Z, Mrugała A, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12:e1001850PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  Bonesi L, Palazon S (2007) The American mink in Europe: status, impacts, and control. Biol Conserv 134:470–483CrossRef
  Branquart E, Verreycken H, Vanderhoeven S, Van Rossum F, Cigar J (2009) ISEIA, a Belgian non-native species assessment protocol. In: Segers H, Branquart E (eds) Science facing aliens. Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Brussels, pp 11–17
  Britton JR, Gozlan RE (2013) Geo-politics and freshwater fish introductions: how the Cold War shaped Europe’s fish allodiversity. Glob Environ Change 23:1566–1574CrossRef
  Britton J, Gozlan RE, Copp GH (2011) Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish Fish 12:256–274CrossRef
  Brunel S, Branquart E, Fried G, Van Valkenburg J, Brundu G, Starfinger U, Buholzer S, Uludag A, Joseffson M, Baker R (2010) The EPPO prioritization process for invasive alien plants. EPPO Bull 40:407–422CrossRef
  Burgman MA, Regan HM, Maguire LA, Colyvan M, Justus J, Martin TG, Rothley K (2014) Voting systems for environmental decisions. Conserv Biol 28:322–332PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  Caffrey JM, Baars J-R, Barbour JH, Boets P, Boon P, Davenport K, Dick JTA, Early J, Edsman L, Gallagher C, Gross J, Heinimaa P, Horrill C, Hudin S, Hulme PE, Hynes S, MacIsaac HJ, McLoone P, Millane M, Moen TL, Moore N, Newman J, O’Conchuir R, O’Farrell M, O’Flynn C, Oidtmann B, Renals T, Ricciardi A, Roy H, Shaw R, Weyl O, Williams F, Lucy FE (2014) Tackling invasive alien species in Europe: the top 20 issues. Manag Biol Invasions 5:1–20CrossRef
  Chytrý M, Pysek P, Wild J, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M (2009) European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Divers Distrib 15:98–107CrossRef
  Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110–110PubMed CrossRef
  Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE (2009) Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Anal 29:457–467PubMed CrossRef
  Copp GH, Russell IC, Peeler EJ, Gherardi F, Tricarico E, Macleod A, Cowx IG, Nunn AD, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Savini D, Mumford J, Britton JR (2014) European non-native species in aquaculture risk analysis scheme—a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture. Fish Manag Ecol. doi:10.​1111/​fme.​12074
  D’hondt B, Vanderhoeven S, Roelandt S, Mayer F, Versteirt V, Adriaens T, Ducheyne E, San Martin G, Grégoire J-C, Stiers I, Quoilini S, Cigar J, Heughebaert A, Branquart E (2015) Harmonia+ and Pandora+: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens. Biol Invasions 17:1869–1883CrossRef
  DAISIE (2009) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Knoxville
  Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431PubMed CrossRef
  Dawson F (1996) Crassula helmsii: attempts at elimination using herbicides. In: Caffrey JM, Barrett PRF, Murphy KJ, Wade PM (eds) Management and Ecology of Freshwater Plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–245
  Demolder H, Peymen J, Anselin A, Adriaens T, De Beck L, Boone N, De Keersmaeker L, De Knijf G, Devos K, Everaert J, Jansen I, Laurijssens G, Louette G, Maes D, Meiresonne L, Neirynck J, Simoens I, Stevens M, Onkelinx T, Van Daele T, Van der Aa B, Van Landuyt W, Van Uytvanck J, Vermeersch G, Verreycken H (2014) Natuurindicatoren 2014. Toestand van de natuur in Vlaanderen: cijfers voor het beleid. Mededeling van het Instituut voor Natuur- en Bosonderzoek, INBO, Brussels
  European Commission (2014) Regulation No. 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Off J Eur Union L317:35–55
  Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76:378CrossRef
  Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2013) The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol 50:757–766CrossRef
  Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2015) Is Great Britain heading for a Ponto-Caspian invasional meltdown? J Appl Ecol 52:41–49CrossRef
  Gallardo B, Zu Ermgassen PSE, Aldridge D (2013) Invasion ratcheting in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and the ability of native and invaded ranges to predict its global distribution. J Biogeogr 40:2274–2284CrossRef
  Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P (2012) irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement (R package version 0.83). Internet resource: http://​CRAN.​R-project.​org/​package=​irr ] (Verified April 10, 2013)
  Genovesi P, Carboneras C, Vila M, Walton P (2015) EU adopts innovative legislation on invasive species: A step towards a global response to biological invasions? Biol Invasions 17:1307–1311CrossRef
  Gherardi F (2007) Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–25CrossRef
  Gilioli G, Schrader G, Baker R, Ceglarska E, Kertész V, Lövei G, Navajas M, Rossi V, Tramontini S, van Lenteren J (2014) Environmental risk assessment for plant pests: a procedure to evaluate their impacts on ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 468:475–486PubMed CrossRef
  Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23PubMed PubMedCentral
  Jackson MC, Grey J (2013) Accelerating rates of freshwater invasions in the catchment of the River Thames. Biol Invasions 15:945–951CrossRef
  Katsanevakis S, Wallentinus I, Zenetos A, Leppäkoski E, Çinar ME, Oztürk B, Grabowski M, Golani D, Cardoso AC (2014) Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. Aquat Invasions 9:391–423CrossRef
  Keller RP, Lodge DM, Finnoff DC (2007) Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:203–207PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  Kelly J, O’Flynn C, Maguire C (2013) Risk analysis and prioritisation for invasive and non-native species in Ireland and Northern Ireland. A report prepared for the the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and the National Parks and Wildlife Service as part of Invasive Species Ireland, p 59
  Kenis M, Bacher S, Baker RHA, Branquart E, Brunel S, Holt J, Hulme PE, MacLeod A, Pergl J, Petter F, Pyšek P, Schrader G, Sissons A, Starfinger U, Schaffner U (2012) New protocols to assess the environmental impact of pests in the EPPO decision-support scheme for pest risk analysis. EPPO Bull 42:21–27CrossRef
  Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, ten Brink P, Shine C (2008) Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IS)—assessment of the impacts of IS in Europe and the EU. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, p 40
  Louette G, Devisscher S, Adriaens T (2014) Combating adult invasive American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Eur J Wildlife Res 60:703–706
  Lowe SJ, Browne M, Boudjelas S (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), Auckland
  Mack R, Lonsdale W (2002) Eradicating invasive plants: hard-won lessons for islands. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. Proceedings of the international conference on eradication of island invasives IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, pp 164–172
  Matthews J, Beringen R, Creemers R, Hollander H, van Kessel N, van Kleef H, van de Koppel S, Lemaire AJJ, Odé B, van der Velde G, Verbrugge LNH, Leuven RSEW (2014) Horizonscanning for new invasive non-native species in the Netherlands. Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen
  McLaughlan C, Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2014) How complete is our knowledge of the ecosystem services impacts of Europe’s top 10 invasive species? Acta Oecolo 54:119–130
  Molnar JL, Gamboa RL, Revenga C, Spalding MD (2008) Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front Ecol Environ 6:485–492CrossRef
  Parrott D, Roy S, Baker R, Cannon R, Eyre D, Hill M, Wagner M, Roy H, Preston C, Beckmann B, Copp GH, Edmonds N, Ellis J, Laing I, Britton JR, Gozlan RE (2009) Horizon scanning for new invasive non-native species in England. Natural England, Peterborough
  Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65CrossRef
  Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’connell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zern J, Aquino T (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20.
  R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria
  Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshw Biol 48:972–981CrossRef
  Ricciardi A, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP, Lockwood JL (2013) Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecol Monogr 83:263–282CrossRef
  Robertson P, Adriaens T, Caizergues A, Cranswick P, Devos K, Gutiérrez-Expósito C, Henderson I, Hughes B, Mill A, Smith G (2014) Towards the European eradication of the North American ruddy duck. Biol Invasions 17:9–12CrossRef
  Roy H, Peyton J, Aldridge DC, Bantock T, Blackburn T, Bishop J, Britton R, Clark P, Cook E, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Dines T, Dobson M, Edwards F, Harrower C, Harvey M, Minchin D, Newman J, Noble D, Parrott D, Pocock M, Preston C, Roy S, Salisbury A, Schonrogge K, Sewell J, Shaw RE, Stebbing P, Stewart A, Walker K (2014a) Horizon-scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain. Glob Change Biol 20:3859–3871CrossRef
  Roy HE, Schonrogge K, Dean H et al (2014b) Invasive alien species—framework for the identification of invasive alien species of EU concern ENV.B.2/ETU/2013/0026. European Commission, Brussels
  Roy HE, Adriaens T, Aldridge DC, Bacher S, Bishop JDD, Blackburn TM, Branquart E, Brodie J, Carboneras C, Cook EJ, Copp GH, Dean HJ, Eilenberg J, Essl F, Gallardo B, Garcia M, García-Berthou E, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Kenis M, Kerckhof F, Kettunen M, Minchin D, Nentwig W, Nieto A, Pergl J, Pescott O, Peyton J, Preda C, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Rorke S, Scalera R, Schindler S, Schönrogge K, Sewell J, Solarz W, Stewart A, Tricarico E, Vanderhoeven S, van der Velde G, Vilà M, Wood CA, Zenetos A (2015) Invasive alien species—prioritising prevention efforts through horizon scanning. ENV.B.2/ETU/2014/0016. European Commission, Brussels
  Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMed CrossRef
  Sandvik H, Sæther B-E, Holmern T, Tufto J, Engen S, Roy H (2013) Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria. Biodivers Conserv 22:37–62CrossRef
  Secord D (2003) Biological control of marine invasive species: cautionary tales and land-based lessons. Biol Invasions 5:117–131CrossRef
  Sutherland WJ, Woodroof HJ (2009) The need for environmental horizon scanning. Trends Ecol Evol 24:523–527PubMed CrossRef
  Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2:238–247CrossRef
  Wadsworth R, Collingham Y, Willis S, Huntley B, Hulme P (2000) Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: Are they out of control? J Appl Ecol 37:28–38CrossRef
  Walther G-R, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pyšek P, Kühn I, Zobel M, Bacher S, Botta-Dukát Z, Bugmann H, Czúcz B, Dauber J, Hickler T, Jarošík V, Kenis M, Klotz S, Minchin D, Moora M, Nentwig W, Ott J, Panov VE, Reineking B, Robinet C, Semenchenko V, Solarz W, Thuiller W, Vilà M, Vohland K, Settele J (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693PubMed CrossRef
  Zieritz A, Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2014) Registry of non-native species in the Two Seas region countries (Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). NeoBiota 23:65–80CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Belinda Gallardo (1) (2)
  Alexandra Zieritz (1) (3)
  Tim Adriaens (4)
  Céline Bellard (5) (6)
  Pieter Boets (7) (8)
  J. Robert Britton (9)
  Jonathan R. Newman (10)
  Johan L. C. H. van Valkenburg (11)
  David C. Aldridge (1)
  
  1. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
  2. Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Ecological Restoration, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda. Montañana 1005, Campus de Aula Dei, 50059, Saragossa, Spain
  3. School of Geography, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  4. Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
  5. Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Darwin Building, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
  6. Ecology, Systematic and Evolution, UMR CNRS 8079, Université Paris Sud, 91405, Orsay, France
  7. Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, J. Plateaustraat 22, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
  8. Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Godshuizenlaan 95, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
  9. Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK
  10. Centre for Ecology and Hydrobiology (CEH Wallingford), Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8BB, UK
  11. Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, National Reference Centre, P.O. Box 9102, 6700 HC, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences
  Plant Sciences
  Ecology
  Hydrobiology
  Zoology
  Forestry
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1464

文摘

Horizon scanning for high-risk invasive non-native species (INNS) is crucial in preparing and implementing measures to prevent introductions, as well as to focus efforts in the control of species already present. We initiated a trans-national horizon-scanning exercise focused on four countries in western Europe: Great Britain, France, Belgium and The Netherlands, which share similar environmental and socio-economic characteristics. We followed a structured four-step approach combining existing knowledge about INNS, with a collaborative identification of priorities for research and management: (1) systematic review of potential INNS of concern, (2) discrimination of INNS into an Alert and Black List depending on their absence or presence in the study area respectively, (3) risk analysis of the Alert List, and (4) expert ranking of species in the Black List. Amongst species not yet present in the four countries (i.e. Alert List), assessors reliably pointed to the Emerald ash-borer (Agrilus planipennis) and Sosnowski’s hogweed (Heracleum sosnowskyi) as those INNS with the highest risk of invasion and impact. The Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera), zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and killer shrimp (Dikerogammarus villosus) were consistently highlighted as some of the most problematic INNS already present in the study area (i.e. Black List). The advantages of our combined approach include that it is inclusive of all-taxa, prioritizes both established and emerging biological threats across trans-national scales, and considers not only the ecological impact, but also potential direct economic consequences as well as the manageability of invasive species. Keywords Collaborative risk assessment Ecological impact Invasive potential Economic impact Management Invasive species Alert List Black List Prioritization