Invertebrate food sources for waterbirds provided by the reconstructed wetland of Nyirkai-Hany, northwestern Hungary

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Zsófia Horváth (1) hhzsofia@gmail.com
  Márta Ferenczi (28)
  Arnold Móra (3)
  Csaba Ferenc Vad (14)
  András Ambrus (5)
  László Forró (6)
  Gergely Sz?vényi (1)
  Sándor Andrikovics (7)
• 关键词：Invertebrate biomass – Zooplankton – Macroinvertebrate – Waterbird trophic guild – Wetland restoration
• 刊名：Hydrobiologia
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：November 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：697
• 期：1
• 页码：59-72
• 全文大小：490.4 KB
• 参考文献：1. Andrikovics, S., A. Bankovics, T. Cs?rg?, G. Gere, M. Sass & J. T?r?k, 1992. Hydrozoological characters of a reconstructed wetland. Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica 7: 65–70.
  2. Andrikovics, S., G. Gere & E. Futó, 1997. The nutrition of Greylag Goose and its effect on the eutrophication of Kisbalaton (Hungary). In Faragó, S. & J. Kerekes (eds), Limnology and Waterfowl. Monitoring, Modelling and Management, Vol. 43. Proceedings of a Symposium on Limnology and Waterfowl held in Sopron/Sarród, Hungary, November 21–23, 1994. Wetlands International Publication: 199–210.
  3. Andrikovics, S., L. Forró, G. Gere, Gy. Lakatos & L. Sasvári, 2006. Water bird guilds and their feeding connections in the Bodrogzug, Hungary. Hydrobiologia 367: 31–42.
  4. Arzel, C., J. Elmberg, M. Guillemain, M. Lepley, F. Bosca, P. Legagneux & J.-B. Nogues, 2009. A flyway perspective on food resource abundance in a long-distance migrant, the Eurasian teal (Anas crecca). Journal of Ornithology 150: 61–73.
  5. Boros, E., S. Andrikovics, B. Kiss & L. Forró, 2006. Feeding ecology of migrating waders (Charadrii) at sodic-alkaline pans in the Carpathian Basin. Bird Study 53: 86–91.
  6. Boros, E., T. Nagy, Cs. Pigniczki, L. Kotymán, K. V. Balogh & L. V?r?s, 2008. The effect of aquatic birds on the nutrient load and water quality of soda pans in Hungary. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54: 207–224.
  7. Brawley, A. H., R. S. Warren & R. A. Askins, 1998. Bird use of restoration and reference marshes within the Barn Island Wildlife Management Area, Stonington, Connecticut, USA. Environmental Management 22: 625–633.
  8. Br?nmark, C., 1994. Effects of Tench and Perch on interactions in a freshwater, benthic food chain. Ecology 75: 1818–1828.
  9. Br?nmark, C. & L. A. Hansson, 1998. The Biology of Lakes and Ponds. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  10. Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.
  11. Brown, K. M. & D. R. DeVries, 1985. Predation and the distribution and abundance of a pulmonate pond snail. Oecologia 66: 93–99.
  12. Cooper, C. B. & S. H. Anderson, 1996. Significance of invertebrate abundance to dabbling duck brood use of created wetlands. Wetlands 16: 557–563.
  13. Danell, K. & K. Sj?berg, 1982. Successional patterns of plants, invertebrates and ducks in a man-made lake. Journal of Applied Ecology 19: 395–409.
  14. De Bernardi, R., G. Guissani & M. Manca, 1987. Cladocera: predators and prey. Hydrobiologia 145: 225–243.
  15. Dinka, M., 2006. A Fert?, valamint a Nyirkai-Hany és a Keleti Mórrétek rekonstrukciós területének hidrobiológiai vizsgálata. [Hydrobiological investigation on the Fert? and the Nyirkai-Hany and Keleti Mórrétek reconstruction areas—in Hungarian.] Research Report, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót: 4–40.
  16. Dodson, S. I., 1974a. Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55: 613–695.
  17. Dodson, S. I., 1974b. Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: a new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnology and Oceanography 19: 721–729.
  18. Falk, D. A., M. A. Palmer & J. B. Zedler (eds), 2006. Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, Washington, DC.
  19. Felf?ldy, L., 1974. A biológiai vízmin?sítés. [Biological water qualification—in Hungarian.] Vízügyi Hidrobiológia 3. VIZDOK, Budapest.
  20. Ferenczi, M., A. Pellinger & T. Cs?rg?, 2009. Vízimadár k?z?sség monitorozása a Nyirkai-Hany él?hely-rekonstrukció területén. [Waterbird monitoring of the Nyirkai-Hany wetland reconstruction area—in Hungarian with English abstract.] Természetvédelmi K?zlemények 15: 446–456.
  21. Ferguson, H. J. & C. F. Rakocinski, 2008. Tracking marsh restoration using macrobenthic metrics: implementing a functional approach. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16: 277–289.
  22. Gere, G. & S. Andrikovics, 1994. Feeding of ducks and their effects on water quality. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 157–161.
  23. Gilbert, O. L. & P. Anderson, 1998. Habitat Creation and Repair. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  24. Gilbert, G., G. Tyler & K. W. Smith, 2003. Nestling diet and fish preference of Bitterns Botaurus stellaris in Britain. Ardea 91: 35–44.
  25. Grayson, J. E., M. G. Chapman & A. J. Underwood, 1999. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 43: 227–236.
  26. Hebert, P. D. N., J. D. S. Witt & S. J. Adamowicz, 2003. Phylogeographical patterning in Daphnia ambigua: regional divergence and intercontinental cohesion. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 261–268.
  27. Hrbá?ek, J., M. Dvo?akova, V. Ko?ínek & L. Procházkóva, 1961. Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 14: 192–195.
  28. Hudec, I. & M. Illyová, 2006. Pleuroxus denticulatus (Crustacea: Anomopoda: Chydoridae): a new invader in the Danube Basin. Hydrobiologia 368: 65–73.
  29. Hurlbert, S. H. & C. C. Y. Chang, 1983. Ornitholimnology: effects of grazing by the Andean Flamingo (Phoenicoparrus andinus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 80: 4766–4769.
  30. Hurlbert, S. H., J. Zedler & D. Fairbanks, 1972. Ecosystem alteration by mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation. Science 175: 639–641.
  31. Jackson, L. L., N. Lopoukhine & D. Hillyard, 1995. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restoration Ecology 3: 71–75.
  32. Kárpáti, L., 2003. Vizes él?helyrekonstrukció a Hanságban. [Wetland reconstruction in the Hanság—in Hungarian.] Thesis, University of Debrecen.
  33. Kovács, B., 1971. A búbosv?cs?k (Podiceps cristatus L.) Hortobágyon gy?jt?tt gyomortartalmainak táplálék?sszetétele. [Zusammensetzung der Nahrung der im Gebiete Hortobágy gesammelten Mageninhalte der Haubentaucher (Podiceps cristatus L.)—in Hungarian with German Abstract.] Debreceni Agrártudományi F?iskola Tudományos K?zleményei: 112–187.
  34. Kubetzky, U. & S. Garthe, 2003. Distribution, diet and habitat selection by four sympatrically breeding gull species in the south-eastern North Sea. Marine Biology 143: 199–207.
  35. Lillie, R. A. & J. O. Evrard, 1994. Influence of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of northwestern Wisconsin. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 235–246.
  36. Lopes, R. J., M. A. Pardal & J. C. Marques, 2000. Impact of macroalgal blooms and wader predation on intertidal macroinvertebrates: experimental evidence from the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 249: 165–179.
  37. Maier, G., 1996. Daphnia invasion: population dynamics of Daphnia assemblages in two eutrophic lakes with particular reference to the introduced alien Daphnia ambigua. Journal of Plankton Research 18: 2001–2015.
  38. Manny, B. A., W. C. Johnson & R. G. Wetzel, 1994. Nutrient additions by waterfowl to lakes and reservoirs: predicting their effects on productivity and water quality. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 121–132.
  39. Margóczi, K., G. Takács, A. Pellinger & L. Kárpáti, 2002. Wetland reconstruction in Hanság area (Hungary). Restoration Newsletter 15: 14–15.
  40. Marklund, O., H. Sandsten, L.-A. Hansson & I. Blindow, 2002. Effects of waterfowl and fish on submerged vegetation and macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 47: 2049–2059.
  41. Martin, T. H., L. B. Crowder, C. F. Dumas & J. M. Burkholder, 1992. Indirect effects of fish on macrophytes in Bays Mountain Lake: evidence for a littoral trophic cascade. Oecologia 89: 476–481.
  42. Middleton, B., 1999. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing, and Disturbance Dynamics. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  43. Middleton, B., A. Grootjans, H. Jensen, H. Olde Venterink & K. Margóczi, 2006. Fen management and research perspectives: an overview. In Bobbink, R., B. Beltman, J. T. A. Verhoven & D. F. Whigham (eds), Wetlands: Functioning, Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 247–268.
  44. Moreno-Mateos, D., C. Pedrocchi & F. A. Comín, 2009. Avian communities’ preferences in recently created agricultural wetlands in irrigated landscapes of semi-arid areas. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 811–828.
  45. Mouronval, J. B., M. Guillemain, A. Canny & F. Poirier, 2007. Diet of non-breeding wildfowl Anatidae and Coot Fulica atra on the Perthois gravel pits, northeast France. Wildfowl 57: 68–97.
  46. Mukherjee, A. & C. K. Borad, 2001. Effects of waterbirds on water quality. Hydrobiologia 464: 201–205.
  47. Murkin, H. R. & J. A. Kadlec, 1986. Relationships between waterfowl and macroinvertebrate densities in a northern prairie marsh. The Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 212–217.
  48. Németh, J., 1998. A biológiai vízmin?sítés módszerei. [Methods for biological qualification of surface waters guilds—in Hungarian with English Abstract.] Vízi természet- és k?rnyezetvédelem 7. K?rnyezetgazdálkodási Intézet, Budapest.
  49. OECD, 1982. Eutrophication of Waters. Monitoring, Assessment and Control. OECD, Paris.
  50. Oláh, J. Jr., 2003. Vízimadár anyagforgalmi guildek. [Waterbird trophic guilds—in Hungarian with English Abstract.] Magyar Vízivad K?zlemények, Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Vadgazdálkodási Intézet, Magyar Vízivad Kutató Csoport: 381–423.
  51. Oláh, J. Jr., Gy. Lakatos, B. Kovács, S. Andrikovics & J. Oláh, 2006. Waterbird guilds in Hungarian wetlands. In Hanson, A., J. Kerekes & J. Paquet (eds), Limnology and Aquatic Birds: Abstracts and Selected Papers from the Fourth Conference of the Societas Internationalis Limnologiae (SIL) Aquatic Birds Working Group. Canadian Wildlife Service Technical Report Series 474, Atlantic Region: 92–102.
  52. Pellinger, A., 2003. Madártani monitoring. [Bird monitoring—in Hungarian.] In: Takács, G. (ed.), A dél-hansági él?helyrekonstrukciók komplex ?kológiai monitoringja. [The complex ecological monitoring of the habitat reconstruction in the South Hanság—in Hungarian.] Research Report, Fert?-Hanság National Park Directorate, Sarród: 97–129.
  53. Pellinger, A. & G. Takács, 2006. Nyirkai-Hany vizes él?hely-rekonstrukció. [Restoration project of the wetland habitat of the Nyirkai-Hany, Fert?-Hanság National Park (North-West Hungary)—in Hungarian with English summary.] Research Report, Fert?-Hanság National Park Directorate, Sarród.
  54. Perrow, M. R., M. L. Tomlinson & L. Zambrano, 2002. Fish. In Perrow, M. R. & A. J. Davy (eds), Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Principles of Restoration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 324–354.
  55. P?ys?, H., J. Elmberg, K. Sj?berg & P. Nummi, 2000. Nesting mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) forecast brood-stage food limitation when selecting habitat: experimental evidence. Oecologia 122: 582–586.
  56. R?nicke, H., R. Doerffer, H. Siewers, O. Büttner, K.-E. Lindenschmidt, P. Herzsprung, M. Beyer & H. Rupp, 2008. Phosphorus input by nordic geese to the eutrophic Lake Ardensee, Germany. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, Archiv für Hydrobiologie 172: 111–119.
  57. Sánchez, M. I., A. J. Green & R. Alejandre, 2006. Shorebird predation affects density, biomass, and size distribution of benthic chironomids in salt pans: an exclosure experiment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 9–18.
  58. Standovár, T. & R. B. Primack, 2001. A természetvédelmi biológia alapjai. [Essentials of Conservation Biology—in Hungarian.] Nemzeti Tank?nyvkiadó, Budapest: 423–437.
  59. Sterbetz, I., 1972. Vízivad. [Waterfowl—in Hungarian.] Mez?gazdasági Kiadó, Budapest.
  60. Sutherland, W. J., I. Newton & R. E. Green (eds), 2004. Bird Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  61. Svingen, D. & S. H. Anderson, 1998. Waterfowl management on grass-sage stock ponds. Wetlands 18: 84–89.
  62. Takács, G., 2003. N?vénytani monitoring. [Botanical monitoring—in Hungarian.] In Takács, G. (ed.), A dél-hansági él?helyrekonstrukciók komplex ?kológiai monitoringja. [The complex ecological monitoring of the habitat reconstruction in the South Hanság—in Hungarian.] Research Report, Fert?-Hanság National Park Directorate, Sarród: 31–96.
  63. Takács, G., K. Margóczi & Z. Bátori, 2007. Vegetációváltozások egy nagy kiterjedés? hansági vizes él?hely-rekonstrukción. [Vegetation changes in a large wetland reconstruction in Hanság—in Hungarian with English Abstract.] Természetvédelmi K?zlemények 13: 269–279.
  64. Vasvári, M., 1928. Adalékok a b?l?mbika és a pocgém táplálkozási ?kológiájához. [Beitr?gezur Ern?hrungsoekolgie von Botaurus stellaris L. und Aretta minuta L.—in Hungarian with German Abstract.] Aquila 34/35: 342–374.
  65. Vasvári, M., 1951. A szürkegém, a nagy- és kiskócsag táplálkozási ?kológiája. [Food-ecology of the Common Heron, the Great White Egret and the Little-Egret—in Hungarian with English Abstract.] Aquila 55/58: 23–38.
  66. Vranovsky, M. & J. Terek, 1996. First records of Daphnia ambigua (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) from the rivers Danube and Hron. Biologia 51: 142.
  67. Wolfram-Wais, A., G. Wolfram, B. Auer, E. Mikschi & A. Hain, 1999. Feeding habits of two introduced fish species (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) in Neusiedler See (Austria), with special reference to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hydrobiologia 408/409: 123–129.
  68. Zedler, J. B., 2003. Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 65–72.
  69. Zedler, J. B. & M. W. Weller, 1990. Overview and future directions. In Kusler, J. A. & M. E. Kentula (eds), Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington DC: 405–413.
• 作者单位：1. Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, E?tv?s Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary2. Institute of Wildlife Management and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Forestry, University of West Hungary, Ady Endre u. 5, 9400 Sopron, Hungary3. Balaton Limnological Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Klebelsberg Kuno u. 3, 8237 Tihany, Hungary4. Danube Research Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Jávorka S. u. 14, 2131 G?d, Hungary5. Fert?-Hanság National Park Directorate, Rév-Kócsagvár, 9435 Sarród, Hungary6. Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, 1088 Budapest, Hungary7. Department of Zoology, Eszterházy Károly College, Leányka u. 6, 3330 Eger, Hungary8. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, VIC 3217, Australia
• ISSN：1573-5117

文摘

The Nyirkai-Hany wetland reconstruction area in northwestern Hungary is now designated as a Ramsar and a Natura 2000 site. It was created in 2001–2002 by the Fert?-Hanság National Park Directorate to restore a part of the formerly drained large wetland called Hanság and to offer waterbirds a suitable habitat for feeding and breeding. We focused on this aim of the restoration project and studied the temporal and spatial variation in abundance of birds and their invertebrate prey in this newly created wetland. From April 2007 until May 2008, we sampled plankton, nekton and benthos of different habitats monthly and monitored waterbirds weekly on the three different areas of the Nyirkai-Hany. During our investigations, 135 invertebrate and 53 waterbird species were recorded. Benthos and macrophyte decomposition accelerating guilds were the most abundant waterbird guilds—besides the dominant grazing importer material transporter guild, represented primarily by geese—in the Nyirkai-Hany. Zooplankton assemblages primarily consisted of small species not easily used as a food by planktivorous waterbirds. The low density of zoobenthic biomass and the small extent of shallow water mudflats probably accounted for the scarcity of the bioturbing guild group of birds. Nektonic biomass varied greatly among locations having different vegetation types, was greatest in the shallow water areas dominated by Typha, Carex and Phragmites species and lowest at offshore vegetation-free sites. Chironomids, mayflies and odonates were especially abundant and their biomass significantly correlated with several waterbird species, mainly belonging to the macrophyte decomposition accelerating guild (e.g. Anas platyrynchos, Fulica atra). This guild itself, which has increased in abundance in recent years, showed an exceptionally strong correlation with odonate abundance. These results indicate the growing importance of the Nyirkai-Hany wetland area as a foraging site for waterbirds.