Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Johanna Kopp ; Regine Gerike ; Kay W. Axhausen
- 关键词：Free ; floating car ; sharing ; DriveNow ; Travel behaviour ; Modal split ; Multimodality ; GPS tracking
- 刊名：Transportation
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：May 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：42
- 期：3
- 页码：449-469
- 全文大小：626 KB
- 参考文献：Axhausen, K.W.: Definition of movement and activity for transport modelling. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling, vol. I, pp. 271-84. Elsevier, Oxford (2000)
Cairns, S.: Accessing Cars: Different Ownership and Use Choices. RAC Foundation, London (2011)
Cervero, R., Tsai, Y.: City CarShare in San Francisco, California. Second-year travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transp. Res. Rec. 1887, 117-27 (2004)View Article
Chatterjee, K., Andrews, G., Ricci, M., Parkhurst, G.: Qualitative insights into the effect on travel behavior of joining a carshare. Transp. Res. Rec. 2359, 76-4 (2013)View Article
Chlond, B., Manz, W.: INVERMO, Das Mobilit?tspanel für den Fernverkehr, IfV-Report 00-9, Karlsruhe (2000)
DriveNow: Customer Survey 07 & 10/2011. Internal Document, Munich (2011)
DriveNow: DriveNow Website, URL (23.07.2014). https://?de.?drive-now.?com/- (2014)
Ferrari, S.L.P., Cribari-Neto, F.: Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J. Appl. Stat. 31(7), 799-15 (2004)View Article
Firnkorn, J.: Triangulation of two methods measuring the impacts of a free-floating car-sharing system in Germany. Transp. Res. Part A 46(10), 1654-672 (2012)
Franke, S.: Car-Sharing—vom ?koprojekt zur Dienstleistung, edition sigma. Berlin (2001)
Haefeli, U., Matti, D., Schreyer, C., Maibach, M.: Evaluation Car-Sharing. Schlussbericht, Bern (2006)
Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D 10(6), 427-44 (2005)View Article
Harms, S.: Besitzen oder Teilen: Sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse des Car Sharings. Zürich (2003)
Hirschmann, A.: The paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 54, 761 (1964)
Huwer, U.: Kombinierte Mobilit?t gestalten: Die Schnittstelle ?PNV—car-sharing. Kaiserslautern (2003)
Kopp, J., Gerike, R., Axhausen, K.W.: Status quo and perspectives for car-sharing systems: the example of DriveNow. In: Gerike, R., Hülsmann, F., Roller, K. (eds.) Strategies for Sustainable Mobilities: Opportunities and Challenges, pp. 207-26. Ashgate, Farnham (2013)
Koss, R.: Car-Sharing als Beitrag zur L?sung der verkehrs- und umweltpolitischen Krise? Bremen (2002)
Krampe, S.: Nutzung von Floating Traveller Data (FTD) für mobile Lotsendienste im Verkehr. Darmstadt (2007)
Krietemeyer, H.: Auswirkungen von Car-Sharing auf die Nachfrage nach ?PNV-Leistungen. Der Nahverkehr 15(9), 14-0 (1997)
Lane, C.: PhillyCarShare: first-year social and mobility impacts of car-sharing in Philadelphia. Transp. Res. Rec. 1927, 158-66 (2006)View Article
Lichtenberg, J., Hanel, F.: Car-sharing und ?PNV: Nutzen für Beide? Der Nahverkehr 25(11), 37-1 (2007)
Loose, W.: Car-sharing—Potenziale für weniger Autoverkehr. In: Bracher, T., Holzapfel, H., Lehmbrock, M., Haag, M., Kiepe, F., Reutter, U. (eds.) Handbuch der kommunalen Verkehrsplanung. Für Praxis in Stadt und Region, Berlin (2004)
Madre, J., Axhausen, K.W., Gascon, M.: Immobility: A Microdata Analysis. Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, Lucerne (2003)
Maertins, C.: Die intermodalen Dienste der Bah: Mehr Mobilit?t und weniger Verkehr? Wirkungen und Potenziale neuer Verkehrsdienstleistungen, Discussion Paper SP III 2006-010. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin (2006)
Martin, E., Shaheen, S.: The impact of car-sharing on public transit and non-motorized travel: an exploration of North American car-sharing survey data. Energies 4(12), 2094-114 (2011)View Article
Meijkamp, R.: Changing consumer behavior through eco-efficient services: an empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands. Bus. Strategy Environ 7(4), 234-44 (1998)View Article
Meijkamp, R.: Changing Consumer Behavior Through Eco-efficient Services: an Empirical Study on Car Sharing in the Netherlands. Delft University of Technology, Delft (2000)
Millard-Ball, A.: Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds, TRCP Report 108. Washington, D.C (2005)
Muheim, P.: Car-sharing—der Schlüssel zur kombinierten Mobilit?t. Luzern (1998)
Netz, H.: Carsharing: Okobonus auf dem Prufstand. Umwelt kommunale okologische Briefe. 9(1), 13-4 (2004)
Perner, T., Sch?ne, P., Brosig, H.: Das Dresdner Modell: Car-Sharing und ?PNV. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage, Dresden (2000)
Pesch, S.: Car-Sharing als Element einer Lean Mobility im Pkw-Verkehr. Entlastungspotentiale, gesamtwirtschaftliche Bewertung und Durchsetzungsstrategien, Buchreihe des Instituts für Verkehrswissenschaft an der Universit?t zu K?ln, vol. 59. Düsseldorf (1996)
Petersen, M.: ?konomische Analyse des Car-Sharing. Wiesbaden (1995)
[Plan] Referat für Stadtplanung und Bauordnung (2008) MiDMUC Aufstockung. München
Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H.J.P.: Mobile technologies for activity-travel data collection and analysis. IGI, New York (2014)
Sakhdari, F.: Vermarktung von Car-sharing-Konzepten. Berlin (2006)
Schüssl - 作者单位：Johanna Kopp (1)
Regine Gerike (2)
Kay W. Axhausen (1)
1. Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT), ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland
2. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter Jordan Stra?e 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria - 刊物类别：Business and Economics
- 刊物主题：Economics
Regional Science
Economic Geography
Engineering Economics, Organization, Logistics and Marketing
Technology Management - 出版者：Springer Netherlands
- ISSN：1572-9435
文摘
Characteristics of users and usage of station-based car-sharing services have been discussed in various studies. First analyses of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow have shown that member composition and patterns of use are not very different from those of station-based car-sharing schemes. Nevertheless, free-floating car-sharing members were drawn from a new pool of travellers, they were not attracted by existing station-based car-sharing schemes. This paper goes beyond these analyses and looks not only at the usage of car-sharing services but at the overall travel behaviour of free-floating car-sharing members (FFCS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the specifics of this travel behaviour have been analysed based on substantial data that was collected specifically for this purpose with an innovative survey design based on a GPS tracking smartphone application. The goal of this study is to contrast the core group of members of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow (male, 25-45?years old) with people who do not use car-sharing. Key travel indicators are compared for FFCS and non-car-sharers (NCS) with a special emphasis on type and extend of multimodal travel behaviour within those two groups. The results show higher trip frequency for FFCS and differences in mode choice pattern. FFCS are more intermodal and multimodal in their behaviour. Shares of cycling are significantly higher, shares of private car trips are significantly lower for FFCS compared to NCS. The insights gained in this study can help cities and car-sharing operators to develop framework conditions and services that optimally integrate free-floating car-sharing services into the overall urban transport systems.