The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Anthony Chauvin ; Philippe Ravaud ; Gabriel Baron ; Caroline Barnes…
- 关键词：Peer review ; Q ; sort ; Randomized controlled trials ; Recommendations to reviewers
- 刊名：BMC Medicine
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：December 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：13
- 期：1
- 全文大小：1,053 KB
- 刊物主题：Medicine/Public Health, general; Biomedicine general;
- 出版者：BioMed Central
- ISSN：1741-7015
文摘
Background The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research publications. However, it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. We aimed to identify and sort, according to their importance, all tasks that are expected from peer reviewers when evaluating a manuscript reporting the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and to determine which of these tasks are clearly requested by editors in their recommendations to peer reviewers.