Protocol and baseline data from The Inala Chronic Disease Management Service evaluation study: a health services intervention study for diabetes care

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Deborah A Askew (1)
  Claire L Jackson (1)
  Robert S Ware (2)
  Anthony Russell (3) (4)
  
• 刊名：BMC Health Services Research
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：December 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：10
• 期：1
• 全文大小：465KB
• 参考文献：1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. / Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1047鈥?3. CrossRef
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Diabetes: Australian facts 2008. In / Diabetes series: no. 8; Cat. no. CVD 40. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.
  3. Queensland Health: / The Health of Queenslanders 2008: Prevention of Chronic Disease. Second Repot of the Chief Health Officer Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2008.
  4. Stratton IM, Cull CA, Adler AI, Matthews DR, Neil HA, Holman RR: Additive effects of glycaemia and blood pressure exposure on risk of complications in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study (UKPDS 75). / Diabetologia 2006, 49:1761鈥?. CrossRef
  5. Diabetes Australia: / Diabetes Management in General Practice 2008/09: Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes. 14th edition. Canberra: Diabetes Australia; 2008.
  6. Britt H, Miller G, Charles J, Bayram C, Pan Y, Henderson J, Valenti L, O'Halloran J, Harrison C, Fahridin S: / General practice activity in Australia 2006鈥?7. General practice series no. 21. Cat. no. GEP 21. General Practice. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008.
  7. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K: Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. / JAMA 2002, 288:2469鈥?5. CrossRef
  8. Zwar N, Harris M, Griffiths R, Roland M, Dennis S, Powell Davies G, Hasan I: / A systematic review of chronic disease management. Sydney: Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine. UNSW; 2006.
  9. Askew D, Schluter PJ, Spurling G, Maher CM, Cranstoun P, Kennedy C, Jackson C: Diabetic retinopathy screening in general practice: a pilot study. / Aust Fam Physician 2009, 38:650鈥?.
  10. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B: Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: update regarding thiazolidinediones: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. / Diabetes Care 2008, 31:173鈥?. CrossRef
  11. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Heine RJ, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B: Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: A consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. / Diabetes Care 2006, 29:1963鈥?2. CrossRef
  12. / Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Management in General Practice. Melbourne: Kidney Health Australia; 2007.
  13. Australian Centre for Diabetes Strategies: / National Evidence Based Guidelines for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Prevention and Detection of Macrovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2004.
  14. Tonkin A, Barter P, Best J, Boyden A, Furler J, Hossack K, Sullivan D, Thompson P, Vale M, Cooper C, Robinson M, Clune E: National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: position statement on lipid management--2005. / Heart Lung Circ 2005, 14:275鈥?1. CrossRef
  15. Australian Diabetes Society: / Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2008.
  16. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group / Health Policy 1990, 16:199鈥?08.
  17. Rapley P, Passmore A, Phillips M: Review of the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale: Australian longitudinal study. / Nurs Health Sci 2003, 5:289鈥?7. CrossRef
  18. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. / J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16:606鈥?3. CrossRef
  19. Royal College of General Practitioners: / General Practitioners with a Special Interest (GPwSI). London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009.
  20. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/134/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Deborah A Askew (1)
  Claire L Jackson (1)
  Robert S Ware (2)
  Anthony Russell (3) (4)
  
  1. Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  3. Diamantina Institute for Cancer, Immunology and Metabolic Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  4. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
  

文摘

Background Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most disabling chronic conditions worldwide, resulting in significant human, social and economic costs and placing huge demands on health care systems. The Inala Chronic Disease Management Service aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of care for patients with type 2 diabetes who have been referred by their general practitioner to a specialist diabetes outpatient clinic. Care is provided by a multidisciplinary, integrated team consisting of an endocrinologist, diabetes nurse educators, General Practitioner Clinical Fellows (general practitioners who have undertaken focussed post-graduate training in complex diabetes care), and allied health personnel (a dietitian, podiatrist and psychologist). Methods/Design Using a geographical control, this evaluation study tests the impact of this model of diabetes care provided by the service on patient outcomes compared to usual care provided at the specialist diabetes outpatient clinic. Data collection at baseline, 6 and 12-months will compare the primary outcome (glycaemic control) and secondary outcomes (serum lipid profile, blood pressure, physical activity, smoking status, quality of life, diabetes self-efficacy and cost-effectiveness). Discussion This model of diabetes care combines the patient focus and holistic care valued by the primary care sector with the specialised knowledge and skills of hospital diabetes care. Our study will provide empirical evidence about the clinical effectiveness of this model of care. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12608000010392.