Pocket ultrasound device as a complement to physical examination for ascites evaluation and guided paracentesis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Daniel Keil-Ríos ; Hiram Terrazas-Solís…
• 关键词：Ascites ; Paracentesis ; Ultrasound ; Handheld ; Pocket
• 刊名：Internal and Emergency Medicine
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：11
• 期：3
• 页码：461-466
• 全文大小：385 KB
• 参考文献：1.Ginès P, Angeli P, Lenz K, Møller S, Moore K, Moreau R et al (2010) EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascities, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal síndrome in cirrosis. J Hepatol 53:397–417CrossRef
  2.Goldberg BB, Clearfield HR, Goodman GA, Morales JO (1973) Ultrasonic determination of ascites. Arch Intern Med 131(2):217–220CrossRef PubMed
  3.Cattau EL Jr, Benjamin SB, Knuff TE, Castell DO (1982) The accuracy of the physical exam in the diagnosis of suspected ascites. JAMA 247:1164–1166CrossRef PubMed
  4.Chongtham DS, Singh MM, Kalantri SP, Pathak S, Jain AP (1998) Accuracy of clinical manoeuvres in detection of minimal ascites. Indian J Med Sci 52(11):514–520PubMed
  5.Branney SW, Wolfe RE, Moore EE, Albert NP, Heinig M, Mestek M et al (1995) Quantitative sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid. J Trauma 39(2):375–380CrossRef PubMed
  6.Sakai H, Sheer TA, Mendler MH, Runyon BA (2005) Choosing the location for non-image guided abdominal paracentesis. Liver Int 25:984–986CrossRef PubMed
  7.Williams JW, Simel DL (2009) Chapter 6. Does this patient have ascities? How to divine fluid in the abdomen. In: Simel DL, Rennie D, Keitz SA (eds) The rational clinical examination: evidence-based clinical diagnosis. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 65–73
  8.Goldberg BB, Goodman GA, Clearfield HR (1970) Evaluation of ascites by ultrasound. Radiology 96(1):15–22CrossRef PubMed
  9.Runyon BA (1986) Paracentesis of ascitic fluid: a safe procedure. Arch Intern Med 146:2259–2261CrossRef PubMed
  10.Nazeer SR, Dewbre H, Miller AH (2005) Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians vs the traditional technique. Am J Emerg Med 23(3):363–367CrossRef PubMed
  11.Lin CH, Shih FY, Ma MH, Chiang WC, Yang CW, Ko PC (2005) Should bleeding tendency deter abdominal paracentesis? Dig Liver Dis 37:946–951CrossRef PubMed
  12.Ross GJ, Kessler HB, Clair MR, Gatenby RA, Hartz WH, Ross LV (1989) Sonographically guided paracentesis for palliation of symptomatic malignant ascites. Am J Roentgenol 153:1309–1311CrossRef
  13.Bard C, Lafortune M, Breton G (1986) Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis? Can Med Assoc J 135:209–210
  14.McGahan JP, Anderson MW, Walter JP (1986) Portable real-time sonographic and needle guidance systems for aspiration and drainage. Am J Roentgenol 147:1241–1246CrossRef
  15.Alcaraz FA, Juhl-Olsen P, Sloth E (2012) Advances in imaging: ultrasound in every physician´s pocket. Expert Opin Med Diagn 6(3):167–170CrossRef
  16.Lisi M, Cameli M, Mondillo S, Luzzi L, Zacà V, Cameli P et al (2012) Incremental value of pocket-sized imaging device for bedside diagnosis of unilateral pleural effusions and ultrasound guided thoracocentesis. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 15:596–602CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  17.Mjolstad OC, Dalen H, Graven T, Kleinau JO, Salvesen O, Haugen BO (2012) Routinely adding ultrasound examinations by pocket-sized ultrasound devices improves inpatient diagnostics in a medical department. Eur J Intern Med 23:185–191CrossRef PubMed
  18.Biais M, Carrie C, Delaunay F, Morel N, Revel P, Janvier G (2012) Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac utlrasonography in an emergency setting. Crit Care 16:R82CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  19.Galderisi M, Santoro A, Versiero M, Lomoriello VS, Esposito R, Raia R et al (2010) Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 8:51CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  20.Sayasneh A, Preisler J, Smith A, Saso S, Naji O, Abdallah Y et al (2012) Do pocket-sized ultrasound machines have the potential to be used as a tool to triage patients in obstetrics an gynecology? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40:145–150CrossRef PubMed
  21.Barreiros AP, Cui XW, Ignee A, De Molo C, Pirri C, Dietrich CF (2014) EchoSchopy in scanning abdominal disease: initial clinical experience. Z Gastroentrol 52:269–275CrossRef
  22.Colli A, Prati D, Fraquelli M, Segato S, Vescovi PP, Colombo F et al (2015) The use of a pocket sized ultrasound device improves physical examination: results of an in- and outpatient cohort study. PLoS One 10(3):e0122181. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0122181 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  23.Stock KF, Klein B, Steubl D, Lersch C, Heemann U, Wagenpfeil S et al (2015) Comparison of a pocket-size ultrasound device with a premium ultrasound machine: diagnostic value and time required in bedside ultrasound examination. Abdom Imaging 40:2861–2866CrossRef PubMed
  24.De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, Morard I, Bresson-Hadni S, Torres F et al (2009) Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:906–909CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Daniel Keil-Ríos (1)
  Hiram Terrazas-Solís (2)
  Alejandro González-Garay (3)
  Juan Francisco Sánchez-Ávila (1)
  Ignacio García-Juárez (1)
  
  1. Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, Mexico
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
  3. Department of Research Methodology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
  
• 刊物主题：Internal Medicine;
• 出版者：Springer Milan
• ISSN：1970-9366

文摘

The pocket ultrasound device (PUD) is a new tool that may be of use in the early detection of ascites. Abdominal ultrasound-guided paracentesis has been reported to decrease the rate of complications due to the procedure, but must be performed in a healthcare setting; this new tool may be a useful on an ambulatory basis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of the PUD in the diagnosis of ascites and the safety of guided paracentesis. We conducted a retrospective study that included adult patients suspected of having ascites and in whom an evaluation was performed with the PUD to identify it. Concordance with abdominal ultrasound (AUS) was determined with the Kappa coefficient. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and likelihood ratios (LR) were determined and compared with physical examination, AUS, computed tomography and procurement of fluid by paracentesis. Complications resulting from the guided paracentesis were analyzed. 89 participants were included and 40 underwent a paracentesis. The PUD for ascites detection had 95.8 % Se, 81.8 % Sp, 5.27 +LR and 0.05 −LR. It had a concordance with AUS of 0.781 (p < 0.001). Technical problems during the guided paracentesis were present in only two participants (5 %) and three patients (7.5 %) developed minor complications that required no further intervention. There were no severe complications or deaths. This study suggests that the PUD is a reliable tool for ascites detection as a complement to physical examination and appears to be a safe method to perform guided paracentesis.