Transvaginale Cholezystektomie

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：M. Federlein ; V.A. Müller ; F. Fritze-Büttner ; J. Burghardt ; S. Gr?ber…
• 关键词：NOTES ; Transvaginale Cholezystektomie ; Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie ; Postoperative Schmerzen ; Komplikationen ; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery ; Transvaginal cholecystectomy ; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy ; Postoperative pain ; Complications
• 刊名：Der Chirurg
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：September 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：85
• 期：9
• 页码：825-832
• 全文大小：613 KB
• 参考文献：1. Ott DO (1908) Results achieved by the use of direct illumination of the abdominal cavity, colon and urinary bladder during operations and for examination. Russky Vrach 43:3-1
  2. Sutton C (2002) The history of vaginal hysterectomy. In: Sheth SS, Studd J (Hrsg) Vaginal hysterectomy. Martin Dunitz, London
  3. Litynski GS (1997) Laparoscopy -the early attempts: spotlighting Georg Kelling and Hans Christian Jacobaeus. JSLS 1(1):83-5
  4. Litynski GS (1998) Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341-46
  5. McGowan L (1966) Incidental appendectomy during vaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 95(4):588
  6. Semm K (1982) Advances in pelviscopic surgery. Prog Clin Biol Res 112 Pt B:127-49
  7. Delvaux G, Devroey P, De WB, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):307-09
  8. Zornig C, Emmermann A, Waldenfels HA von, Felixmuller C (1994) Colpotomy for specimen removal in laparoscopic surgery. Chirurg 65(10):883-85
  9. Wilk PJ, inventor (1994) Method for use in intra-abdominal surgery. United States of America patent US5297536 A
  10. Kalloo A, Kantsevoy SV, Singh VK et al (2000) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastroenterology 118:A1039 CrossRef
  11. Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.. http://www.apolloendo.com/about-us/. Zugegriffen: 28. Juni 2014
  12. ASGE, SAGES (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery white paper october 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63(2):199-03 j.gie.2005.12.007" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R et al (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16(3):458-64 CrossRef
  14. Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V et al (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24(10):2444-452 CrossRef
  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205-13 CrossRef
  16. Arezzo A, Zornig C, Mofid H et al (2013) The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report. Surg Endosc 27(9):3073-084 CrossRef
  17. Carlson MA (2013) Comment on ?Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)- (doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4). Surg Endosc
  18. Borchert D, Federlein M, Ruckbeil O et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(12):3597-604 CrossRef
  19. Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C et al (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. ?conventional-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(5):709-15 CrossRef
  20. Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J et al (2013) Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(2):580-86 CrossRef
  21. Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25(6):1822-826 CrossRef
  22. Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2012) Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy -a retrospective case-control study. Zentralbl Chir 137(1):48-4 CrossRef
  23. Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N et al (2013) Transvaginal/transumbilical Hybrid-NOTES-Versus 3-Trocar Needlescopic Cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg
  24. Borchert DH, Federlein M, Fritze-Buttner F et al (2014) Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc
  25. Wood SG, Panait L, Duffy AJ et al (2013) Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a series of 102 patients. Ann Surg
  26. Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R et al (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Endoscopy 42(7):571-75 CrossRef
  27. Doerr-Harim C, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Knebel P (2014) Insights into surgical trials: methodological challenges and solutions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(3):273-78 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：M. Federlein (1)
  V.A. Müller (2)
  F. Fritze-Büttner (1)
  J. Burghardt (3)
  S. Gr?ber (4)
  K. Gellert (1)
  D.H. Borchert M.D. (4)
  
  1. Klinik für Allgemein- und Visceralchirurgie, Sana Kliniken Berlin-Brandenburg, Sana Klinikum Berlin-Lichtenberg, Berlin, Deutschland
  2. Klinik für Chirurgie, Charité Universit?tsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
  3. Klinik für Chirurgie, Immanuel Krankenhaus, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland
  4. Klinik für Chirurgie, Universit?t des Saarlandes, Universit?tskliniken Homburg, Kirrbergerstr. 100, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland
  
• ISSN：1433-0385

文摘

Background Transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) is regarded as a model operation in the newly developed field of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Randomized, controlled trials to assess TVC as a surgical strategy are largely missing. Materials and methods The study was a double blind, randomized, controlled, single center trial in female patients >-8 years with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) and TVC. The study investigated pain reduction of ≥- point on a visual-numeric rating scale with a follow-up after 7 days. Secondary endpoints were complications and patient reported outcome. Groups were established using computer-generated randomization and sealed envelopes in the operating theatre. At the end of the surgical procedure all patients received a standard 4-trocar dressing as for CLC and a vaginal tamponade. Results A total of 426 patients were asked to participate, of which 97 were randomized, 51 in the CLC, 41 in the TVC groups and 5 were excluded from the study. Patients were comparable regarding age, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. Surgical and anesthesia times were significantly different. There was no difference in postoperative pain. The majority of patients were satisfied with both procedures and TVC was recommended to other patients by 93- of patients in the TVC group. Conclusion The results did not show superiority of TVC over CLC with regards to postoperative pain. With no differences in postoperative pain and high patient satisfaction, TVC can be recommended to future patients as an alternative method. For confirmation of this evaluation of TVC further randomized trials are needed.