Preference and adoption of Farmer Field School (FFS) Prosopis juliflora management practices: Experiences in Baringo District, Kenya

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Eunice Njoroge (1)
  Peter Sirmah (1)
  Francis Mburu (1)
  Eric Koech (2)
  Mugo Mware (2)
  Josiah Chepkwony (2)
  
• 关键词：Prosopis juliflora ; Farmer Field School ; management practices ; Baringo ; Kenya
• 刊名：Forest Science and Practice
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：December 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：14
• 期：4
• 页码：283-290
• 全文大小：641KB
• 参考文献：1. Andersson S. 2005. Spread of the introduced tree species / Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC in the Lake Baringo area, Kenya. Institutionen f枚r Skoglig Vegetationsekologi SLU, UME脜, Sweden
  2. Asiabaka C. 2002. Promoting sustainable extension approaches: Farmer Field School (FFS) and its role in sustainable agricultural development in Africa. Int J Agric Rural Dev, 3: 46鈥?3
  3. Binggeli P. 2001. The human dimension of invasive woody plants. In: McNeely J A, ed. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, 145鈥?60
  4. Braun A, Duveskog D. 2008. The Farmer Field School approach 鈥?History, global assessment and success stories. Background Paper for the IFAD Rural Poverty Report. Nairobi, Kenya
  5. Braun A R, Jiggins J, R枚ling N, van den Berg H, Snijders P. 2005. A global survey and review of Farmer Field School experiences. International Livestock Research Institute. Nairobi, Kenya
  6. Choge S K, Chikamai B N. 2004. Experiences of prosopis utilization and management from outside Kenya. Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrated Management of / Prosopis Species in Kenya. Soi Safari Club, Lake Baringo, Kenya, 78鈥?2
  7. Choge S K, Odee D, Okeyo M. 2006. Management and control of / Prosopis species in Kenya. Proceedings of the 3rd KEFRI Scientific Conference. Muguga, Kenya, 193鈥?99
  8. Choge S K, Pasiecznik N M, Harvey M, Wright J, Awan S Z, Harris P J C. 2007. / Prosopis pods as human food, with special reference to Kenya. Waters SA, 33(3): 419鈥?24
  9. Endalew B D. 2009. Effectiveness of Farmer Field School in promoting coffee management practices: The case of Jimma and Sidama zones, Ethiopia. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Ethiopia, Kenya: Haramaya University
  10. Esbenshade H W, Grainger A. 1980. The Bamburi reclamation project. Inter Tree Crops J, 1: 199鈥?02 CrossRef
  11. Gatheru P. 2009. Marigat farmers earn millions from mathenge tree. http://www.kenyaagriculture.or.ke. Accessed 20 April 2010
  12. Kariuki P M. 1993. A social forestry project in Baringo, Kenya: A critical analysis. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Nairobi, Kenya: University of Kenyatta
  13. Kenya Law Reports. 2010. Petition 466 of 2006 of Republic of Kenya in the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts). http://www.keyalaw.org. Accessed 19 March 2010
  14. Kohli R K, Batish D R, Singh H P, Dogra K S. 2006. Status, invasiveness and environmental threats of three tropical American invasive weeds ( / Parthenium hysterophorus L., / Ageratum conyzoides L., / Lantana camara L.) in India. Biol Inv, 8: 1501鈥?510 CrossRef
  15. Lenachuru C I. 2003. Impacts of / Prosopis species in Baringo District. Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrated Management of / Prosopis Species in Kenya. Soi Safari Club, Lake Baringo, Kenya, 53鈥?0
  16. Luther G C, Harris C, Sherwood S, Gallagher K, Mangan J, Gamby K T. 2005. Developments and innovations in Farmer Field Schools and the training of trainers. In: Norton G W, Heinrichs E A, Luther G C, Irwin M E, eds. Globalizing Integrated Pest Management: A Participatory Research Process. Iowa, USA: Blackwell Publishing, 159鈥?90 CrossRef
  17. Maghembe J A, Kariuki E M, Haller R D. 1983. Biomass and nutrient accumulation in young / Prosopis juliflora at Mombasa, Kenya. Agroforest Syst, 1: 313鈥?21 CrossRef
  18. Mburu F, Muisu F, Sirmah P, Gerardin P. 2005. Impregnability of / Grevillea robusta using the sap displacement method. Bois et For锚ts des Tropiques, 286(4): 65鈥?2
  19. Mwangi E, Swallow B. 2005. Invasion of / Prosopis juliflora and local livelihoods: Case study from the Lake Baringo area of Kenya. World of Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Nairobi, Kenya
  20. Pasiecznik N M, Choge S K, Muthike G M, Chesang S, Fehr C, Bakewell-Stone P, Wright J, Harris P J C. 2006. Putting knowledge on / Prosopis into use in Kenya. Pioneering advances in 2006. Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI). Nairobi, Kenya and HDRA, Coventry, UK: 13
  21. Pasiecznik N M, Felker P, Harris P J C, Harsh L N, Cruz G, Tewari J C, Cadoret K, Maldonado L J. 2001. The / Prosopis juliflora 鈥?Prosopis pallida Complex: A monograph. HDRA, Coventry, UK, 172
  22. Rola A C, Jamias S B, Quizon J B. 2002. Do Farmer Field School graduates retain and share what they learn? An investigation in Iloilo, Philippines. J Int Agric Exten Educ, 9(1): 65鈥?6
  23. Sang C J. 2009. Community perceptions and socio-economic impacts of / Prosopis juliflora to households welfare in Marigat and Makutano Divisions of Baringo District, Kenya. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Eldoret, Kenya: Moi University
  24. Sang J, Ogweno D, Senelwa K, Choge S, Changole M, Nyandiga C O, Gachanja M, Nengo K. 2006. Community perception and socio-economic impacts of / Prosopis juliflora on household livelihoods in Marigat Division, Baringo District, Kenya. Proceedings of the 3rd KEFRI Scientific Conference. Muguga, Kenya, 200鈥?06
  25. Shiferaw H, Teketay D, Nemomissa S, Assefa F. 2004. Some biological characteristics that foster the invasion of / Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. at Middle Awash Rift Valley Area, northeastern Ethiopia. J Arid Environ, 58: 135鈥?54 CrossRef
  26. Simpson B M, Owens M. 2002. Farmer field schools and the future of agricultural extension in Africa. J Int Agric Exten Educ, 9(2): 29鈥?6
  27. Sirmah P, Muisu F, Mburu F, Dumar莽ay S, G茅rardin P. 2008. Evaluation of / Prosopis juliflora properties as an alternative to wood shortage in Kenya. Bois et For锚ts des Tropiques, 298(4): 25鈥?5
  28. Veitch C R, Clout M N. 2001. Human dimensions in the management of invasive species in New Zealand. In: McNeely J A, ed. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, 63鈥?1
  29. Zimmermann H G, Moran V C, Hoffmann J H. 2004. Biological control in the management of invasive alien plants in South Africa, and the role of the Working for Water programme. S Afr J Sci, 100: 34鈥?0
  
• 作者单位：Eunice Njoroge (1)
  Peter Sirmah (1)
  Francis Mburu (1)
  Eric Koech (2)
  Mugo Mware (2)
  Josiah Chepkwony (2)
  
  1. School of Natural Resource Management, Moi University, Eldoret, 1125, Kenya
  2. School of Natural Resource Management, Kabianga University, Kericho, 2030, Kenya
  

文摘

This research was carried out to evaluate the preference and adoption of harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning practices for controlling the spread of Prosopis juliflora (prosopis) within Marigat Division of the Baringo District, Kenya. A survey methodology was employed using a random sample of 25 Farmer Field School (FFS) members and 5 non-FFS members from each of the five locations of Marigat Division. In total, 100 FFS members and 25 non-FFS members participated in the study; additional supplementary data were collected from the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), a major facilitator and trainer of the identified FFS activities and practices in the study area since 2004. More than 80% of the local community never undertook any form of prosopis management practice; however, this changed after FFS training, indicating an acquisition and retention of knowledge which probably diffused to the non-FFS counterparts, through either formal or informal ways. Harvesting was the most preferred (100%) and stump burning the least preferred (46%) practice of managing the spread of prosopis. The success and preference of any prosopis management practice was attributed to wood and non-wood benefits derived from prosopis and growing of animal fodder and food crops on rehabilitated land. More than 80% of respondents attributed ineffectiveness of any prosopis management practice to coppicing and viable seed banks of the tree, while 50% highlighted a lack of consistency and integration in carrying out management practices. The reported negative attitude towards prosopis changed after training with none of the view to eradicate it. Labor intensity and frequent regeneration of seedlings were identified as the major challenges faced during the implementation of prosopis management practices. In conclusion, the study shows that harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning realized through consistent holistic integration contribute to containing the spread of prosopis trees in Baringo, Kenya.