Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Susan W. Cobey (1)
  
• 关键词：Apis mellifera ; queen honey bees ; instrumental insemination ; colony performance ; Apis mellifera ; reine d鈥檃beilles ; ins茅mination artificielle ; performance de la colonie ; Apis mellifera ; Honigbienenk枚nigin ; k眉nstliche Besamung ; Leistungsf盲higkeit des Bienenvolkes
• 刊名：Apidologie
• 出版年：2007
• 出版时间：July 2007
• 年：2007
• 卷：38
• 期：4
• 页码：390-410
• 全文大小：217KB
• 参考文献：1. Almeida R., Soares A.E.E. (2002) Usage of green coconut water and different tissue culture media for in vitro honey bee semen storage ( / Apis mellifera), Interciencia 27, 317鈥?21.
  2. Apoegait V., Skirkevicius A. (1995) Quantitative and qualitative composition of extracts from virgin and mated honey bee queens ( / Apis mellifera L), Pheromones 5, 23鈥?6.
  3. Austin G.H. (1955) Effects of carbon dioxide anesthesia on bee behavior and expectation of life, Bee World 36, 45鈥?7.
  4. Boigenzahn C., Pechhacker H. (1993) 脺ber die Art der Anpaarung, Bienenvater 114, 151鈥?52.
  5. Bienkowska M., Panasiuk B. (2006) Influence of the diameter of the inseminating needle tip on the results of bee queens鈥?fertilization, J. Apic. Sci. 50, 137鈥?45.
  6. Bolten A.B., Harbo J.R. (1982) Numbers of spermatozoa in the spermatheca of the queen honeybee after multiple insemination with small volumes of semen, J. Apic. Res. 21, 7鈥?0.
  7. 膶erm谩k K. (2004) Evaluation of artificially inseminated and naturally mated bee queens in Zubri, Czech Republic (in Czech), Vcelarstvi 57, 148鈥?49.
  8. Chuda-Mickiewicz B., Prabucki J., Samborski J. (2003) Onset of oviposition in honey bee queens kept in boxes with non-free flying bees, J. Apic. Sci. 47, 27鈥?0.
  9. Cobey S. (1983) The development of instrumental insemination, Am. Bee J. 123, 108鈥?11.
  10. Cobey S. (1998) A Comparison Of Colony Performance Of Instrumentally Inseminated and Naturally Mated Honey Bee Queens. Proc. American Bee Research Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, Am. Bee J. 138, 292.
  11. Collins A.M. (2000a) Relationship between semen quality and performance of instrumentally inseminated honey bee queens, Apidologie 31, 421鈥?29. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000132">CrossRef
  12. Collins A.M. (2000b) Survival of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) spermatozoa stored at above freezing temperatures, J. Econ. Entomol. 93, 568鈥?71. dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.568">CrossRef
  13. Collins A.M. (2003) A scientific note on the effect of centrifugation on pooled honey bee semen, Apidologie 34, 469鈥?70. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003030">CrossRef
  14. Currie R.W. (1987) The biology and behavior of drones, Bee World 68, 129鈥?43.
  15. Ebadi R., Gary N.E. (1980) Factors effecting the survival, migration of spermatozoa and onset of oviposition in instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees, J. Apic. Res. 19, 196鈥?04.
  16. Fischer F. (1990) External influences on the filling of the spermatheca with sperm, Apidologie 21, 359鈥?60.
  17. Free J.B., Ferguson A.W, Simpkins J.R. (1992) The behavior of queen honey bees and their attendants, Physiol. Entomol. 17, 43鈥?5. dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1992.tb00988.x">CrossRef
  18. Fuchs S., Schade V. (1994) Lower performance in honey bee colonies of uniform paternity, Apidologie 24, 155鈥?68. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19940204">CrossRef
  19. Gerinsz G., Bienkowska M. (2002) Effect of injury to honey bee queens on egg laying rate and colony strength, J. Apic. Sci. 46, 75鈥?3.
  20. Gerula D. (1999) Comparison of honey production of caucasian and carniolan bees in years with nectar flow and honeydew flow, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 43, 59鈥?9.
  21. Gontarz A., Bienkowska M., Loc K. (2005) Effect of queen caging conditions on insemination results, J. Apic. Sci. 49, 5鈥?5.
  22. Guler A., Alpay H. (2005) Reproductive characteristics of some honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes, J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 4, 864鈥?70.
  23. Haarman T., Spivak M., Weaver D., Weaver B., Glenn T. (2002) Effects of fluvalinate and coumaphos on queen honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in two commercial queen rearing operations, J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 28鈥?5. dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.28">CrossRef
  24. Harbo J.R. (1979a) Storage of honey bee spermatozoa at 鈭?96 掳C, J. Apic. Res. 18, 57鈥?3.
  25. Harbo J.R. (1979b) Egg hatch of honey bees fertilized with frozen spermatozoa, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72, 516鈥?18.
  26. Harbo J.R. (1981) Viability of honey bee eggs from progeny of frozen spermatozoa, J. Apic. Res. 74, 482鈥?86.
  27. Harbo J.R. (1986a) Oviposition rates of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated queen honey bees fertilized by artificial insemination, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79, 112鈥?15.
  28. Harbo J.R. (1986b) Propagation and instrumental insemination, in: Rinderer T.E. (Ed.), Bee Breeding and Genetics, Academic Press, Inc., pp. 361鈥?89.
  29. Harbo J.R. (1990) Artificial mixing of spermatozoa from honey bees and evidence for sperm competition, J. Apic. Res. 29, 151鈥?58.
  30. Harbo J.R. (2005) Personal Communication. USDA Bee Lab. Baton, Rouge, LA.
  31. Harbo J.R., Szabo T.J. (1984) A comparison of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated queens, J. Apic. Res. 23, 31鈥?6.
  32. Harbo J.R., Williams J.L. (1987) Effect of above freezing temperature on temporary storage of hone bee spermatozoa, J. Apic. Res. 26, 53鈥?6.
  33. Harizanis P.C., Gary N.E. (1984) The quality of insemination of queen honey bees mated under commercial conditions, Am. Bee J. 124, 385鈥?87.
  34. Jasinski Z. (1987) Injuries of queens caged in queenless honey bee colonies, Proc. XXXIst International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, 126.
  35. Jasnousek J. (1987) Effect of carbon dioxide on initial oviposition of inseminated queens, Vedecke Prace Vyzkumneho Ustavu Vcelarskeho v Dole 9, 57鈥?4.
  36. Jhajj H.S., Vchahal B.S., Brar H.S. (1992) Fabrication of queen trap for Apis mellifera L. and studies on the premating period, Indian Bee J. 5, 63鈥?7.
  37. Kaftanoglu O., Peng Y.S. (1980) A washing technique for collection of honey bee semen, J. Apic. Res. 23, 205鈥?11.
  38. Kaftanoglu O., Peng Y.S. (1982) Effects of insemination on the initiation of oviposition in the queen honey bee, J. Apic. Res. 21, 3鈥?.
  39. Koeniger G. (1986) Reproduction and mating behavior, in: Rinderer T.E. (Ed.), Bee Breeding and Genetics, Academic Press, Inc., pp. 235鈥?52.
  40. Konopacka Z. (1987) Biological quality of instrumentally inseminated queens, Proc. XXX 1st International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, pp. 163鈥?67.
  41. Konopacka Z. (1991) Effect of CO₂ and N₂O an aesthetics on the results of instrumental insemination of queen honey bees, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 35, 3鈥?8.
  42. Konopacka Z., Bienkowska M. (1995) The results of queen insemination with the semen stored in glass capillaries, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 39, 213鈥?17.
  43. K眉hnert M., Carrrick M.J., Allan L.E (1989) Use of homogenized drone semen in a bee breeding program in Western Australia, Apidologie 20, 371鈥?81. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19890501">CrossRef
  44. Laidlaw H.H. (1987) Instrumental Insemination of honey bee queens: Its origin and development, Bee World 68, 17鈥?8, 71鈥?8.
  45. Lensky Y., Slabezky Y.J. (1981) The inhibitory effect of queen bees (Apis mellifera) footprint pheromone on the construction of swarming cups, J. Insect Physiol. 27, 313鈥?23. dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(81)90077-9">CrossRef
  46. Locke S.J., Peng Y.S. (1993) The effects of drone age, semen storage and contamination on semen quality in the honey bee, Physiol. Entomol. 18, 144鈥?48. dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00461.x">CrossRef
  47. Lodesani M., Balduzzi D., Galli A. (2004) Functional characterization of semen in honey bee queens ( / A.m. ligustica S.) spermatheca and efficiency of the diluted semen technique in instrumental insemination, Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3, 385鈥?92.
  48. Mackensen O. (1947) Effect of carbon dioxide on initial oviposition of artificially inseminated and virgin queen bees, J. Econ. Entomol. 40, 344鈥?49.
  49. Mackensen O. (1955) Experiments in the technique of artificial insemination of queen bees, J. Econ. Entomol. 48.
  50. Mackensen O. (1964) Relation of semen volume to success in artificial insemination of queen honey bees, J. Econ. Entomol. 57, 581鈥?83.
  51. Mackensen O., Roberts W.C. (1948) A Manual for the artificial insemination of queen bees: US Bur. Entomol. Plant Quar. ET-250.
  52. Moritz R.F.A. (1983) Homogeneous mixing of honey bee semen by centrifugation, J. Apic. Res. 22, 249鈥?55.
  53. Moritz R.F.A. (1984) The effect of different diluents on insemination success in the honey bee using mixed semen, J. Apic. Res. 23, 164鈥?67.
  54. Moritz R.F.A., K眉hnert M. (1984) Seasonal effects of artificial insemination of honey bee queens ( / Apis mellifera L.), Apidologie 15, 223鈥?31. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19840210">CrossRef
  55. Nelson D.L. (1989) Assessment of queen quality in honey bee queens, Can. Beekeeper 14, 207鈥?08.
  56. Nelson D.L., Laidlaw H.H. (1988) An evaluation of instrumentally inseminated queens shipped in packages, Am. Bee J. 128, 279鈥?80.
  57. Oertel E. (1940) Mating flights of the queen bee, Glean, Bee Culture 68, 292鈥?93.
  58. Otten C., Otto A., Renner, R. (1998) Artificial Insemination: Methodological influences on the results, Apidologie 29, 467.
  59. Page R.E., Laidlaw H.H. (1985) Closed Population Honeybee Breeding, Bee World 66, 63鈥?2.
  60. Palmer K.A., Oldroyd B.P. (2000) Evolution of multiple mating in the genus Apis, Apidologie 31, 235鈥?48. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000119">CrossRef
  61. Pankiw T. (2004) Cued In: honey bee pheromones as information flow and collective decision-making, Apidologie 35, 217鈥?26. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004009">CrossRef
  62. Pankiw T., Winston M.L., Plettner E., Slessor K.N., Pettis J.S., Taylor O.R.J. (1996) Mandibular components of European and Africanized honey bee queens, J. Chem. Ecol. 22, 605鈥?16. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02033573">CrossRef
  63. Phiancharoen M., Wongsiri S., Koeniger N., Koeniger G. (2004) Instrumental insemination of / Apis mellifera queens with hetero- and conspecific spermatozoa results in different sperm survival, Apidologie 35, 503鈥?11. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004043">CrossRef
  64. Prabucki J., Jasinski Z., Chuda-Mickiewicz B. (1987) The results of mass insemination of bee queen inseminated onefold and twofold and stocked in different ways, Proc. XXX1 st International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 169鈥?74.
  65. Pritsch G., Bienefeld K. (2002) Comparison of performance of bee colonies with naturally mated and artificially inseminated queens ( / A.m. carnica), Apidologie 33, 513.
  66. Rhodes J.W., Somerville D.C. (2003) Introduction and early performance of queen bees, Report: Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation, NSW Agriculture Pub # 03/049. Project # DAN-182A.
  67. Rhodes J.W., Somerville D.C., Harden S. (2004) Queen honey bee introduction and early survival-effects of queen age at introduction, Apidologie 35, 383鈥?88. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004028">CrossRef
  68. Richard F.-J., Fan Y., Grozinger C. (2005) Effect of mating number on pheromone profiles of inseminated honey bee queens, Proc. Entomol. Soc. Am. Annu. Meeting #0760 [online] http: //esa.confex.com / esa/ 2005 / techprogram / paper_20617.htm (accessed 26 June 2007).
  69. Rinderer T.E., De Guzman L., Lancaster V.A., Delatte G.T., Stelzer J.A. (1998) Varroa in the mating yard: I. The effect of Varroa jacobsoni and Apistan on drone honey bees, Am. Bee J. 139, 134鈥?39.
  70. Roberts W.C. (1946) Performance of the queen bee, Am. Bee J. 85, 185鈥?86, 211.
  71. Ruttner F., Koeniger G. (1971) The filling of the spermatheca of the honey bee queen: active migration or passive transport of the spermatozoa? Z. Vergl. Physiol. 72, 411鈥?22. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00300712">CrossRef
  72. Ruttner F., Tryasko V.V. (1976) Anatomy and physiology of reproduction, in: Ruttner F. (Ed.), The instrumental insemination of the queen bee, Apimondia, Bucharest, pp. 11鈥?4.
  73. Severson D.W., Erickson E.H. (1989) Seasonal constraints on mating and insemination of queen honeybees in a continental climate, Apidologie 20, 21鈥?7. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19890103">CrossRef
  74. Skowronek W. (1976) Mating behavior of queen honey bees after carbon dioxide anaesthesia, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe 20, 99鈥?15.
  75. Skowronek W., Jaycox E.R. (1974) Effects of carbon dioxide on honey bee workers, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe 18, 107鈥?19.
  76. Skowronek W., Konopacka Z. (1983) The effect of inseminating queen honey bees with semen stored under laboratory conditions, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe 27, 3鈥?2.
  77. Skowronek W., Kruk C., Klopot J. (2002) Factors affecting oviposition of artificially inseminated honey bee queens, J. Apic. Sci. 46, 85鈥?5.
  78. Slessor K.N., Kaminski L.A., Borden J.H., Winston M.L. (1988) Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen bees, Nature 332, 354鈥?56. dx.doi.org/10.1038/332354a0">CrossRef
  79. Slessor K.N., Kaminski L.A., King G.G.S., Winston M.L. (1990) Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands, J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 851鈥?60. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01016495">CrossRef
  80. Smith R.K., Spivak M., Taylor O.R. (1991) Chemical differences between naturally mated and instrumentally enseminated queens, Proc. Am. Bee Res., Conf. Am. Bee J. 13, 781.
  81. Smith R.K., Spivak M., Taylor O.R., Bennett C., Smith M.L. (1993) Maturation of tergal gland alkenes profiles in European honey bee queens, / Apis mellifera L., J. Chem. Ecol. 19, 133鈥?42. dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00987478">CrossRef
  82. Szabo T.I., Townsend G.F. (1974) Behavioral studies on queen introduction in the honey bee.1. Effect of the age of workers on their behavior towards an introduced virgin. 2. Effect of age and storage conditions of virgin queens on their attractiveness to workers. 3. Relationship between queen attractiveness to worker and worker aggressiveness toward a queen, J. Apic. Res. 13, 19鈥?5, 127鈥?35, 161鈥?71.
  83. Szabo T.J., Mills P.F., Heikel D.T. (1987) Effects of honey bee queen weight and air temperature on the initiation of oviposition, J. Apic. Res. 26, 73鈥?8.
  84. Szalai E. (1995) Results of instrumental insemination of queen honey bees in Hungary, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe 39, 61鈥?9.
  85. Taber S.I., Blum M.S. (1960) Preservation of honey bee semen, Science 131, 1734鈥?735. dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3415.1734">CrossRef
  86. Tajabadi N., Tahmasbi G., Javaheri D., Yrahmadi S., Adl M.F. (2005) Comparison of colonies with natural mated and inseminated queens in Iran: Animal Science Research Institute of Iran, Final Report of Research Plan.
  87. Tarpy D.R., Fletcher D.J. (1998) Effects or relatedness on queen competition within honey bee colonies, Anim. Behav. 55, 537鈥?43. dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0617">CrossRef
  88. Tarpy D.R., Page R.E. (2000) No behavioral control over mating frequency in queen honey bees: implications for the evolution of extreme polyandry, Am. Nat. 155, 820鈥?27. dx.doi.org/10.1086/303358">CrossRef
  89. Tarpy D.R., Page R.E. (2002) Sex determination and the evolution of polyandry in honey bees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 143鈥?50. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0498-7">CrossRef
  90. Van Eaton C. (1986) Determinants of queen quality in New Zealand commercial queens, New Zealand Beekeeper 28鈥?0.
  91. Verma L.R. (1978) Biology of honey bee ( / Apis mellifera L.) spermatozoa. 1. effect of different diluents on motility and survival, Apidologie 9, 167鈥?74. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19780301">CrossRef
  92. Vesely V. (1970) Retention of semen in the lateral oviducts in artificially inseminated honey bee queens, Acta Ent. Bohemoslov. 67, 83鈥?2.
  93. Vesely V. (1984) Der Einfluss der k眉nstlichen Besamung auf die Leistungszucht, Bienenvater 105, 332鈥?35, 366鈥?70.
  94. Wilde J. (1987) The development and productivity of honey bee colonies with naturally mated and artificially inseminated queens, Proc. XXX1st International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 442鈥?44.
  95. Wilde J. (1994a) Comparison of the development and productivity of bee colonies with naturally and instrumentally inseminated queens kept in different conditions before and after the insemination, Acta Academiae Agricultural Technicae Olstenensis, Zootechnica 39, 135鈥?52.
  96. Wilde J. (1994b) The effects of keeping queen honey bees after instrumental insemination on their performance, Acta Academiae Agricultural Technicae Olstenensis, Zootechnica 39, 153鈥?66.
  97. Wilde J., Bobrzecki J. (1994) Utility value of honeybee queens beginning to lay in different periods after insemination, Acta Academiae Agricultural Technicae Olstenensis, Zootechnica 39, 205鈥?12.
  98. Woyke J. (1962) Natural and artificial insemination of queen honey bees, Bee World 43, 21鈥?5.
  99. Woyke J. (1966) Factors that determine the number of spermatozoa in the spermatheca of naturally mated queens, Z. Bienenforsch. 8, 236鈥?47.
  100. Woyke J. (1971) Correlations between the age at which honey bee brood was grafted, characteristics of the resultant queens and results of inseminations, J. Apic. Res. 10, 45鈥?5.
  101. Woyke J. (1979) Effect of the access of worker honey bees to the queen on the results of instrumental insemination, J. Apic. Res. 18, 136鈥?43.
  102. Woyke J. (1983) Dynamics of entry of spermatozoa into the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees, J. Apic. Res. 22, 150鈥?54.
  103. Woyke J. (1988) Problems with queen banks, Am. Bee J. 128, 276鈥?78.
  104. Woyke J. (1989a) Correct maintenance before and after instrumental insemination, tested in Egypt, J. Apic. Res. 28, 187鈥?90.
  105. Woyke J. (1989b) Maintenance of queens before and after Instrumental Insemination, in: Moritz R.F.A. (Ed.), The Instrumental Insemination of the Queen Bee, Bucharest, Apimondia, pp. 85鈥?1.
  106. Woyke J. (1989c) Results of instrumental insemination, in: Moritz R.F.A. (Ed.), The Instrumental Insemination of the Queen Bee, Bucharest, Apimondia, pp. 93鈥?03.
  107. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1973) Influence of external conditions on the number of spermatozoa entering the spermatheca of honey bee queens, J. Apic. Sci. 12, 145鈥?51.
  108. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1976) Influence of the age on the results of instrumentally insemination of honey bee queens, Apidologie 7, 301鈥?06. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19760402">CrossRef
  109. Woyke J., Ruttner F. (1976) Results, in: Ruttner F. (Ed.), The instrumental insemination of the queen bee, Apimondia, Bucharest, pp. 87鈥?2.
  110. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1978) Influence of age of drones on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queens, Apidologie 9, 202鈥?12. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19780304">CrossRef
  111. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1980) Influence of the number of attendant workers on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queens kept at room temperature, Apidologie 11, 173鈥?79. dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19800207">CrossRef
  112. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1982) Influence of the number of attendant workers on the number of spermatozoa entering the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queens kept outdoors in mating nuclei, J. Apic. Sci. 21, 129鈥?33.
  113. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1985) Comparison of the dynamics of entry of spermatozoa into the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees kept under different conditions, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe 29, 377鈥?88.
  114. Woyke J., Jasinski Z. (1990) Effect of the number of attendant worker bees on the initiation of egg laying by instrumentally inseminated queens kept in small nuclei, J. Apic. Res. 29, 101鈥?06.
  115. Woyke J., Jasinski Z., Flisziekiewic C. (1995) Further investigation on natural mating of instrumentally inseminated queen bees, J. Apic. Res. 34, 105鈥?06.
  116. Woyke J., Fliszkiewicz C., Jasinski Z. (2001) Prevention of natural mating of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees by proper method on instrumental insemination, J. Apic. Sci. 45, 101鈥?14.
  117. Zmarlicki C., Morse R.A. (1962) The mating of aged virgin queen honeybees, J. Apic. Res. 1, 62鈥?3.
  
• 作者单位：Susan W. Cobey (1)
  
  1. Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  

文摘

Instrumental insemination, a reliable method to control honey bee mating, is an essential tool for research and stock improvement. A review of studies compare colony performance of instrumentally inseminated queens, IIQs, and naturally mated queens, NMQs. Factors affecting queen performance are also reviewed. The collective results of the data demonstrate that the different methodologies used, in the treatment of queens, has a significant affect on performance rather than the insemination procedure. Beekeeping practices can optimize or inhibit performance. The competitive performance of IIQs is demonstrated when queens are given proper care. The advantage of selection and a known semen dosage can result in higher performance levels of IIQs.