Balancing Life with an Increased Risk of Cancer: Lived Experiences in Healthy Individuals with Lynch Syndrome

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Helle Vendel Petersen ; Mef Nilbert ; Inge Bernstein…
• 关键词：Hereditary cancer ; Risk perception ; Balancing life ; Family context ; Phenomenological research method
• 刊名：Journal of Genetic Counseling
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：October 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：23
• 期：5
• 页码：778-784
• 全文大小：180 KB
• 参考文献：1. Aktan-Collan, K., Mecklin, J. P., Jarvinen, H., Nystrom-Lahti, M., Peltomaki, P., Soderling, I., et al. (2000). Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: uptake and long-term satisfaction. / International Journal of Cancer, 89, 44-0. CrossRef
  2. Aktan-Collan, K., Haukkala, A., Mecklin, J. P., Uutela, A., & Kaariainen, H. (2001). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study. / International Journal of Cancer, 93, 608-11. CrossRef
  3. Aktan-Collan, K. I., Kaariainen, H. A., Kolttola, E. M., Pylvanainen, K., Jarvinen, H. J., Haukkala, A. H., et al. (2011). Sharing genetic risk with next generation: mutation-positive parents-communication with their offspring in Lynch Syndrome. / Familial Cancer, 10, 43-0. CrossRef
  4. Bartuma, K., Nilbert, M., & Carlsson, C. (2012). Family perspectives in lynch syndrome becoming a family at risk, patterns of communication and influence on relations. / Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 10, 6. CrossRef
  5. Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., ?yen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., et al. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 211-22. CrossRef
  6. Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., & Havik, O. E. (2008). Anxiety and depression among subjects attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. / Patient Education and Counseling, 71, 234-43. CrossRef
  7. Bleiker, E. M., Esplen, M. J., Meiser, B., Petersen, H. V., & Patenaude, A. F. (2013). 100 years lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues? / Familial Cancer.
  8. Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A. T., & Sutton, S. (2006). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Familial Cancer, 5, 61-5. CrossRef
  9. Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. / European Journal of Human Genetics, 8, 731-38. CrossRef
  10. Buckmaster, A. M., & Gallagher, P. (2010). Experiences of and perspectives on genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer in and outside of the customary clinical setting. / Psychology and Health, 25, 1041-059. CrossRef
  11. Carlsson, C., & Nilbert, M. (2007). Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 811-20. CrossRef
  12. Clarke, A. (1990). Genetics, ethics, and audit. / Lancet, 335, 1145-147. CrossRef
  13. Codori, A. M., Waldeck, T., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D., Trimbath, J. D., & Tillery, M. A. (2005). Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 119-32. CrossRef
  14. d’Agincourt-Canning, L., & Baird, P. (2006). Genetic testing for hereditary cancers: the impact of gender on interest, uptake and ethical considerations. / Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 58, 114-23. CrossRef
  15. Dahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H., & Nystrom, M. (2010). / Reflective lifeworld research. (second edition 2008 ed.). Sweden: Studentlitteratur AB.
  16. Di Pietro, M. L., Giuli, A., & Spagnolo, A. G. (2004). Ethical implications of predictive DNA testing for hereditary breast cancer. / Annals of Oncology, 15(Suppl 1), I65–I70. CrossRef
  17. Ersig, A. L., Hadley, D. W., & Koehly, L. M. (2011). Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. / Health Communication, 26, 587-94. CrossRef
  18. Esplen, M. J., Stuckless, N., Wong, J., Gallinger, S., Aronson, M., Rothenmund, H. et al. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch Syndrome (LS). / Clinical Genetics.
  19. Giorgi, A. (1975). Phenomenology and the foundations of psychology. / Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 23, 281-48.
  20. Giorgi, A. (2005). The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. / Nursing Science Quarterly, 18, 75-2. CrossRef
  21. Giorgi, A. (2009). / The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburg: Dusquesne University Press.
  22. Giorgi, A. (2011). An application of phenomenological method in psychology. In / Duqesne studies in Phenomenological Psychology.
  23. Jarvinen, H. J., Aarnio, M., Mustonen, H., Aktan-Collan, K., Aaltonen, L. A., Peltomaki, P., et al. (2000). Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. / Gastroenterology, 118, 829-34. CrossRef
  24. Koornstra, J. J., Mourits, M. J., Sijmons, R. H., Leliveld, A. M., Hollema, H., & Kleibeuker, J. H. (2009). Management of extracolonic tumours in patients with Lynch syndrome. / Lancet Oncology, 10, 400-08. CrossRef
  25. Landsbergen, K. M., Prins, J. B., Brunner, H. G., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Hoogerbrugge, N. (2009). Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact. / Familial Cancer, 8, 325-37. CrossRef
  26. Lynch, H. T., & Lynch, J. (2000). Lynch syndrome: genetics, natural history, genetic counseling, and prevention. / Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 19S-1S.
  27. Lynch, H. T., Lynch, P. M., Lanspa, S. J., Snyder, C. L., Lynch, J. F., & Boland, C. R. (2009). Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. / Clinical Genetics, 76, 1-8. CrossRef
  28. McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. / Clinical Genetics, 64, 179-89. CrossRef
  29. McCann, S., Macauley, D., Barnett, Y., Bunting, B., Bradley, A., Jeffers, L., et al. (2009). Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study. / Psychooncology, 18, 1208-215. CrossRef
  30. Meiser, B. (2005). Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. / Psychooncology, 14, 1060-074. CrossRef
  31. Palmquist, A. E., Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Shegog, M., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2010). “The cancer bond- exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 473-86. CrossRef
  32. Persson, E., Lindholm, E., Berndtsson, I., Lundstam, U., Hulten, L., & Carlsson, E. (2012). Experiences of living with increased risk of developing colorectal and gynaecological cancer in individuals with no identified gene mutation. / Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 20-7. CrossRef
  33. Petersen, H. V., Domanska, K., Bendahl, P. O., Wong, J., Carlsson, C., Bernstein, I., et al. (2011a). Validation of a self-concept scale for lynch syndrome in different nationalities. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 308-13. CrossRef
  34. Petersen, H. V., Esplen, M. J., Ladelund, S., Bernstein, I., Sunde, L., Carlsson, C., et al. (2011b). Limited impact on self-concept in individuals with Lynch syndrome; results from a national cohort study. / Familial Cancer, 10, 633-39. CrossRef
  35. Rao, K. (2009). Recent research in stress, coping and women’s health. / Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 188-93. CrossRef
  36. Sivell, S., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C. L., Clarke, A. J., Iredale, R., Shaw, C., et al. (2008). How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review. / Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 30-3. CrossRef
  37. Steinvall, K., Johansson, H., & Bertero, C. (2011). Balancing a changed life situation: the lived experience from next of kin to persons with inoperable lung cancer. / The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 28, 82-9. CrossRef
  38. Stoffel, E. M., Mercado, R. C., Kohlmann, W., Ford, B., Grover, S., Conrad, P., et al. (2010). Prevalence and predictors of appropriate colorectal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome. / American Journal of Gastroenterology, 105, 1851-860. CrossRef
  39. Vasen, H. F., Abdirahman, M., Brohet, R., Langers, A. M., Kleibeuker, J. H., Van, K. M., et al. (2010). One to 2-year surveillance intervals reduce risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. / Gastroenterology, 138, 2300-306. CrossRef
  40. Vasen, H. F., Blanco, I., Aktan-Collan, K., Gopie, J. P., Alonso, A., Aretz, S., et al. (2013). Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts. / Gut.
  41. Wagner, A., van Kessel, I., Kriege, M. G., Tops, C. M., Wijnen, J. T., Vasen, H. F., et al. (2005). Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. / Familial Cancer, 4, 295-00. CrossRef
  42. Werner-Lin, A., & Gardner, D. S. (2009). Family illness narratives of inherited cancer risk: continuity and transformation. / Families, Systems & Health, 27, 201-12. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Helle Vendel Petersen (1) (2)
  Mef Nilbert (1) (2)
  Inge Bernstein (1) (3)
  Christina Carlsson (2)
  
  1. The HNPCC Register, Clinical Research Centre, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University, Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
  2. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  3. Department of Surgery and Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  
• ISSN：1573-3599

文摘

Possibilities to undergo predictive genetic testing for cancer have expanded, which implies that an increasing number of healthy individuals will learn about cancer predisposition. Knowledge about how an increased risk of disease influences life in a long-term perspective is largely unknown, which led us to explore lived experiences in healthy mutation carriers with Lynch syndrome. Individual interviews were subjected to descriptive phenomenological analysis. Four constitutions, namely, family context, interpretation and transformation, approach to risk and balancing life at risk were identified and formed the essence of the phenomenon “living with knowledge about risk.-Family context influences how experiences and knowledge are interpreted and transformed into thoughts and feelings, which relates to how risk is approached and handled. The constitutions influence each other in a dynamic relationship and create a balancing act between anxiety and worry and feelings of being safe and in control.