Die Nord-Süd Beziehungen nichtstaatlicher Akteure ᾿Dominanz oder gleichberechtigte Partnerschaft?
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：PD Dr. phil. Marc Herkenrath
- 关键词：Non ; State actors ; North ; South conflict ; Global civil society ; Political attitudes ; Social movements
- 刊名：Zeitschrift f¨¹r Au?en- und Sicherheitspolitik
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：September 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：8
- 期：2-supp
- 页码：589-609
- 全文大小：489 KB
- 参考文献：Anderson, K., & Rieff, D. (2004). Global civil society: A sceptical view. In H. Anheier et al. (Hrsg.), Global civil society 2004/5 (S. 26–39). London: Sage.
Anner, M., & Evans, P. (2004). Building bridges across a double divide: Alliances between US and Latin American labour and NGOs. Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 34–47.CrossRef
Ayres, J. (2001). „Transnational political processes and contention against the global economy. Mobilization: An International Journal, 6(1), 55–68.
Bandy, J., & Smith, J. (2005). Factors affecting conflict and cooperation in transnational movement networks. In J. Bandy & J. Smith (Hrsg.), Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neoliberal order (S. 231–252). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bendaña, A. (2006). „NGOs and Social Movements. A North/South Divide?“ United Nations Research Institute for Social Development: UNRISD Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper 22.
Boli, J. (2005). ) „Contemporary developments in world culture. In M. Herkenrath et al. (Hrsg.), Globalizations from „Above“ and „Below.“ The future of world society (S. 383–404). London: Sage. (Sonderheft des International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46 (5–6)).
Bornschier, V. (2008b). Weltgesellschaft. Grundlegende soziale Wandlungen. Erweiterte Neuauflage. Zürich: Loreto Verlag.
Bornschier, V. (2008a). Zur Entwicklung der sozialen Ungleichheit im Weltsystem: Fakten, offene Fragen und erste Antworten. In M. Bayer et al. (Hrsg.), Transnationale Ungleichheitsforschung. Eine neue Herausforderung für die Soziologie (S. 97–134). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
von Bülow, M. (2006). „When North and South Meet. Civil Society and Trade Agreements in the Americas.” Konferenzbeitrag zur Jahrestagung der International Studies Association, San Diego, CA. 22.-25. März 2006.
Byrd, S. (2005). The porto alegre consensus: Theorizing the forum movement. Globalizations, 2(1), 151–163.CrossRef
Chandhoke, N. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In M. Glasius et al. (Hrsg.), Global civil society 2002 (S. 35–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chase-Dunn, C., & Boswell, T. (2004). Global democracy: A world-systems perspective. Protosociology, 20, 15–29.
Chase-Dunn, C., Reese, E., Herkenrath, M., Giem, R., Gutierrez, E., Kim, L., & Petit, C. (2008). North-South contradictions and bridges at the world social forum. In R. Reuveny & W. Thompson (Hrsg.), North and South in the world political economy (S. 341–366). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cox, P., Newell, P., Tuplin, T., & Tussie, D. (2006). „Civil society participation in trade policy-making in Latin America: Reflections and lessons.” IDS Working Paper 267, Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.
Halperin, S., & Laxer, G. (2003). Effective resistance to corporate globalization. In G. Laxer & S. Halperin (Hrsg.), Global civil society and its limits (S. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herkenrath, M. (2009). Nord-Süd-Differenzen in der globalisierungskritischen Bewegung – viel Lärm um Nichts? Ergebnisse einer Umfrage an den Weltsozialforen 2005 und 2007. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 19(3), 379–407.CrossRef
Herkenrath, M. (2011). Die Globalisierung der sozialen Bewegungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRef
Herkenrath, M. (2015). „Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement: Professionalisierte Organisationen und freiwillige Basis im Widerstreit?“ Erscheint. In M. Budowski, U. Knobloch, & M. Nollert (Hrsg.), Unbezahlt und dennoch Arbeit (im Druck). Zürich: Seismo Verlag.
Huyer, S. (2004). Challenging relations: A labour-NGO coalition to oppose the Canada-US and North American free trade agreements, 1985–1993. Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 48–60.CrossRef
Jubilee South. (1999). „Jubilee South and the call for a new strategic alliance.“ Presseerklärung vom 1.12.1999. URL: http://www.jubileesouth.org/¬news/-EpklpkuEFpHMyYYSXS.shtml . Zugegriffen: 18. Jan. 2008.
Levi, M., & Murphy, G. (2006). Coalitions of contention: The case of the WTO protests in seattle. Political Studies, 54, 651–670.CrossRef
Martin, P. L. (2011). Global governance from the amazon: Leaving oil underground in Yasuní national park, Ecuador. Global Environmental Politics, 11(4), 22–42.CrossRef
Massicotte, M.-J. (2003). ‘Local‘ organizing and ‚Global’ struggles: Coalition-building for social justice in the Americas. In G. Laxer & S. Halperin (Hrsg.), Global civil society and its limits (S. 105–125). New York: Macmillan.
Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds apart: Global and international inequality 1950–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pollack, A. (2001). Cross-border, cross-movement alliances in the late 1990s. In. Lustiger-Thaler et al. (Hrsg.), Globalization and social movements (S. 183–205). London: Macmillan.
Rucht, D. (2005). Transnational social movements in the era of globalization. In M. Herkenrath et al. (Hrsg.), The future of world society (S. 183–197). Zürich: Editions à la Carte.
Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring world politics: The limits and asymmetries of soft power. In S. Khagram et al. (Hrsg.), Restructuring world politics. Transnational social movements, networks, and norms (S. 301–317). London: University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, J., & Bandy J. (2005). Introduction: Cooperation and conflict in transnational protest. In J. Bandy & J. Smith (Hrsg.), Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neoliberal order (S. 1–17). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Staggenborg, S. (1986). Coalition work in the pro-choice movement: Organizational and environmental opportunities and obstacles. Social Problems, 33(5), 374–390.CrossRef
Stillerman, J. (2003). Transnational activist networks and the emergence of labor internationalism in the NAFTA countries. Social Science History, 27(4), 577–601.CrossRef
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Yang, M. (2005). Der Nord-Süd-Konflikt im Umfeld der internationalen Jubilee 2000-Kampagne. Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen, 18(1), 72–79. - 作者单位：PD Dr. phil. Marc Herkenrath (1)
1. Universität Zürich, Agnesstrasse 25, 8004, Zürich, Schweiz - 刊物主题：Social Sciences, general; Political Science, general;
- 出版者：Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
- ISSN：1866-2196
文摘
This contribution discusses as to what extent transnational coalition building can allow non-state actors from the global North and South to establish a fair and equal cooperation. The first argument it proposes is that conflicts often stem from strategic differences between professionalized non-governmental organizations than from alleged North-South differences. The second main argument is that, while fundamental North-South differences may have existed in the 1990s, increased possibilities for personal exchanges have led to a notable convergence of political positions.