Reviewing institutional policies for electronic management of assessment
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Julie Voce
- 关键词：e ; Submission ; e ; Marking ; e ; Feedback ; Electronic Management of Assessment ; Policy ; UK Higher Education
- 刊名：Higher Education
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：June 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：69
- 期：6
- 页码：915-929
- 全文大小：389 KB
- 参考文献：Ball, S. (2012). Politics and policy making in education. Abingdon: Routlege.
Bancroft, P., Hynd, J., Dal Santo, F., & Reye, J. (2003). Web-based assignment submission and electronic marking. Paper presented at the 26th Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Annual Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Bridge, P., & Appleyard, R. (2008). A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 644鈥?50.View Article
Buckley, E., & Cowap, L. (2013). An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for electronic submission and marking and as a formative feedback tool from an educator鈥檚 perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 562鈥?70.View Article
Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin庐: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173鈥?91.View Article
Djordjevic, A., & Milward, S. (2012). OCME (Online Coursework Management Evaluation) final report. http://鈥媋s.鈥媏xeter.鈥媋c.鈥媢k/鈥媘edia/鈥媗evel1/鈥媋cademicservices鈥媤ebsite/鈥媋boutus/鈥媌iss/鈥媔ws/鈥媎ocuments/鈥婳CMEFinalReportv鈥?.鈥媝df:鈥婮isc .
Downton, A., Glasfurd-Brown, G., & Mossop, R. (2006). Online coursework submission from pilot to university-wide implementation: rationale, challenges and further development. Paper presented at the 10th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Loughborough, UK.
Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
Ellis, C., & Reynolds, C. (2013). EBEAM final report. http://鈥媕iscdesignstudio鈥?鈥媝bworks.鈥媍om/鈥媤/鈥媐ile/鈥媐etch/鈥?6830875/鈥婨BEAM%20鈥婸roject%20鈥媟eport.鈥媝df:鈥婮isc .
Fairclough, N. (2002). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
Ferrell, G. (2012). A view of the assessment and feedback landscape: Baseline analysis of policy and practice from the JISC Assessment & Feedback programme. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媕isc.鈥媋c.鈥媢k/鈥媤hatwedo/鈥媝rogrammes/鈥媏learning/鈥媬/鈥媘edia/鈥婣639131E053F49A0鈥?EFDDF502CA7AADA鈥?鈥媋shx .
Gray, L., & Ferrell, G. (2013). Electronic assessment management. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://鈥媤ww.鈥媕isc.鈥媋c.鈥媢k/鈥媑uides/鈥媏lectronic-assessment-management .
Jones, D., & Behrens, S. (2003). Online assignment management: An Evolutionary Tale. Paper presented at the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS鈥?3), Big Island, HI, USA.
Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96鈥?10.View Article
Newland, B., Martin, L., Bird, A., & Masika, R. (2013). HELF鈥擡lectronic management of assessment survey report 2013. http://鈥媤01.鈥媓elfcms.鈥媤f.鈥媢lcc.鈥媋c.鈥媢k/鈥媐ileadmin/鈥媎ocuments/鈥媝rojects/鈥婨MAsurveyreport2鈥?13.鈥媝df .
Nolan, J., & Mayfield, W. (2008). A collaborative enquiry into academic practice: An exploration of the meanings of formative assessment鈥?em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">A preliminary critical discourse analysis of the institutional context. Paper presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) Annual Conference, Liverpool, UK.
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O鈥橤arro Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365鈥?16.View Article
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2006). Implementing a university e-learning strategy: Levers for change within academic schools. Research in Learning Technology, 14(2), 135鈥?51.View Article
Smith, K. (2008). 鈥淲ho do you think you鈥檙e talking to?鈥濃€擳he discourse of learning and teaching strategies. Higher Education, 56(4), 395鈥?06.View Article
Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in 鈥榥ew times鈥? Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433鈥?51.View Article
The University of Newcastle Australia. (2013). Definition and role of policy. Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://鈥媤ww.鈥媙ewcastle.鈥媏du.鈥媋u/鈥媠ervice/鈥媝olicy/鈥媎efinition.鈥媓tml .
Thomas, S. (2005). The construction of teacher identities in educational policy documents: A critical discourse analysis. Melbourne Studies in Education, 46(2), 25鈥?4. doi:10.鈥?080/鈥?750848050955642鈥? .View Article
Van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249鈥?83.View Article
Walker, R., Voce, J., & Ahmed, J. (2012). UCISA 2012 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK from http://鈥媤ww.鈥媢cisa.鈥媋c.鈥媢k/鈥媬/鈥媘edia/鈥媑roups/鈥媠sg/鈥媠urveys/鈥婽EL_鈥媠urvey_鈥?012_鈥媤ith%20鈥婣pps_鈥媐inal .
Walker, R., Voce, J., & Jenkins, M. (2013). Charting the development of technology-enhanced learning developments across the UK higher education sector: A longitudinal perspective (2001鈥?012). Interactive Learning Environments,. doi:10.鈥?080/鈥?0494820.鈥?013.鈥?67888 .
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009a). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd Edition ed.). London: Sage.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009b). Methods of critical discourse analysis (Second Edition ed.). London: Sage.
Yorke, M. (1998). The management of assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 101鈥?16.View Article - 作者单位：Julie Voce (1)
1. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK - 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
- 刊物主题：Education
Education - 出版者：Springer Netherlands
- ISSN：1573-174X
文摘
Electronic assignment submission (e-submission) tools, such as those within course management systems (e.g. Blackboard), or systems such as Turnitin, which enable students to submit coursework online are now one of the main centrally supported institutional tools in Higher Education (HE) in the United Kingdom (UK), however the development of institutional policies for the electronic management of assessment (EMA) has not kept up with the implementation of the technology. This study takes a critical discourse analysis approach to review a selection of EMA policies from UK HE institutions. The results find that the policies are often unclear about the main actors involved in the EMA process and fail to clarify who is responsible for actions. In addition, whilst students feature most frequently in the policies, their role is often back-grounded such that students are not given control of the actions relating to them. The study concludes with guidance aimed at anyone writing their own institutional EMA policy and asserts that policies should be clear about the participants involved and their responsibilities.