Framework of Design Requirements for E-learning Applied on Blackboard Learning System
详细信息    查看全文
  • 关键词:E ; learning ; LMS ; Design evaluation ; Usability ; Blackboard
  • 刊名:Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:9330
  • 期:1
  • 页码:471-480
  • 全文大小:184 KB
  • 参考文献:1.Bartuskova, A., Krejcar, O.: Design requirements of usability and aesthetics for E-learning purposes. In: Sobecki, J., Boonjing, V., Chittayasothorn, S. (eds.) Advanced Approaches to Intelligent Information and Database Systems. SCI, vol. 551, pp. 235–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef
    2.Fee, K.: Delivering E-Learning: A Complete Strategy for Design, Application and Assessment. 4th edn. Kogan Page (2009). ISBN 978-0749453978
    3.Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 269–298 (2004)CrossRef
    4.Mbipom, G., Harper, S.: The interplay between web aesthetics and accessibility. In: ASSETS 2011, pp. 147–154. ACM Press, New York (2011)
    5.Bartuskova, A., Krejcar, O.: Evaluation framework for user preference research implemented as web application. In: Bǎdicǎ, C., Nguyen, N.T., Brezovan, M. (eds.) ICCCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8083, pp. 537–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
    6.Nielsen, J.: Usability 101. http://​www.​nngroup.​com/​articles/​usability-101-introduction-to-usability/​ (retrieved March 20, 2015)
    7.ISO: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: guidance on usability - Part 11: guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11:1998)
    8.Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology 53(8), 789–817 (2011)CrossRef
    9.Unal, Z., Unal, A.: Evaluating and comparing the usability of web-based course management systems. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1019–1038 (2011)
    10.Kibaru, F., and Dickson-Deane, C.: Model for training usability evaluators of E-learning. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 517–522 (2010)
    11.Schenkman, B., Jönsson, F.: Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour and Information Technology 19(5), 367–377 (2000)CrossRef
    12.van der Heijden, H.: Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management 40(6), 541–549 (2003)CrossRef
    13.Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19(4), 319–349 (2004)CrossRef
    14.Horton, W.: E-learning by Design. Pfeiffer (2006). ISBN 978-0787984250
    15.Cavus, N., Alhih, M.S.: Learning Management Systems Use in Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143, 517–520 (2014)CrossRef
    16.Islam, A.K.M.N.: Investigating E-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education 69, 387–399 (2013)CrossRef
    17.Caminero, A.C., et al.: Comparison of LMSs: Which is the Most Suitable LMS for my Needs? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 8(S2), 29 (2013)CrossRef
    18.Machado, M., Tao, E.: Blackboard vs. Moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. In: Education, pp. 7–12 (2007)
    19.Carvalho, A., Areal, N., Silva, J.: Students’ Perception of Blackboard and Moodle in a Portuguese University. British Journal of Education Technology 42(5), 824–841 (2011)CrossRef
    20.Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Monge-Lozano, P.: The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education 58(4), 1085–1093 (2012)CrossRef
    21.Oztekin, A., et al.: UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for eLearning systems by criticality metric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40(4), 455–469 (2010)MathSciNet CrossRef
    22.Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review 9, 47–64 (2013)CrossRef
    23.Weinschenk, S.: 100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People. New Riders (2011). ISBN 978-0321767530
    24.W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview. http://​www.​w3.​org/​WAI/​intro/​wcag (retrieved March 15, 2015)
    25.WebAIM: Color Contrast Checker. http://​webaim.​org/​resources/​contrastchecker/​ (retrieved March 18, 2015)
    26.Edugarage by Blackboard: Themes Showcase. http://​www.​edugarage.​com/​display/​BBDN/​Themes+Showcase (retrieved March 18, 2015)
  • 作者单位:Aneta Bartuskova (17)
    Ondrej Krejcar (17)
    Ivan Soukal (18)

    17. Faculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 500 03, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
    18. Faculty of Informatics and Management, Department of Economics, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 500 03, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
  • 丛书名:Computational Collective Intelligence
  • ISBN:978-3-319-24306-1
  • 刊物类别:Computer Science
  • 刊物主题:Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
    Computer Communication Networks
    Software Engineering
    Data Encryption
    Database Management
    Computation by Abstract Devices
    Algorithm Analysis and Problem Complexity
  • 出版者:Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
  • ISSN:1611-3349
文摘
Existing evaluations of learning systems are mostly based on a subjective feedback from end users, in order to measure their satisfaction and experience with the system. The results usually only indicate which areas are weaker than others; comments obtained from users are often casual and fuzzy. Therefore we propose a systematic review of usability and visual appeal by experts in HCI to complement current practice. Our solution of assessment is based on a framework of design requirements for e-learning purposes, which provides a concise easy to follow checklist, covering all significant areas of design assessment. This approach offers factual design issues which should be dealt with and can be especially useful in cases, where feedback from users is hard to obtain or it does not reveal any useful information.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700