A Metaontology for Annotating Ontology Entities with Vagueness Descriptions

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Panos Alexopoulos (14)
  Silvio Peroni (15) (16)
  Boris Villazón-Terrazas (14)
  Jeff Z. Pan (17)
  José Manuel Gómez-Pérez (14)
  
• 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：1
• 期：1
• 页码：100-121
• 全文大小：1,440 KB
• 参考文献：1. Alexopoulos, P., Pavlopoulos, J.: A vague sense classifier for detecting vague definitions in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers, Gothenburg, Sweden, April 2014, vol. 2, pp. 33-7. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)
  2. Alexopoulos, P., Villazon-Terrazas, B., Pan, J.: Towards vagueness-aware semantic data. In: Bobillo, F., Carvalho, R.N., da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Martin, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1073, pp. 40-5. CEUR-WS.org (2013)
  3. Bao, J., Tao, J., McGuinness, D.L., Smart, P.: Context representation for the semantic web. In: Web Science Conference, 26-7 April 2010 (2010)
  4. Barabucci, G., Di Iorio, A., Peroni, S., Poggi, F., Vitali, F.: Annotations with EARMARK in practice: a fairy tale. In: Tomasi, F., Vitali, F., (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Collaborative Annotations in Shared Environments: Metadata, Vocabularies and Techniques in the Digital Humanities (DH-CASE 2013). ACM Press (2013)
  5. Benerecetti, M., Bouquet, P., Ghidini, C.: Contextual reasoning distilled. J. Exp. Theoret. Artif. Intell. 12(3), 279-05 (2000) CrossRef
  6. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy ontology representation using OWL 2. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 52(7), 1073-094 (2011) CrossRef
  7. Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189-94. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)
  8. Buitelaar, P., Sintek, M., Kiesel, M.: A multilingual/multimedia lexicon model for ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 502-13. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
  9. Casellas, N.: Ontology evaluation through usability measures. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM 2009 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5872, pp. 594-03. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
  10. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J., Benjamins, R.: What are ontologies and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. 14(1), 20-6 (1999) CrossRef
  11. Falco, R., Gangemi, A., Peroni, S., Vitali, F.: Modeling OWL ontologies with Graffoo. In: Presutti, V., Blomqvist, E., Troncy, R., Sack, H., Papadakis, I., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014 Satellite Events. LNCS, vol. 8798, pp. 320-25. Springer, Berlin (2014)
  12. Gangemi, A., Lehmann, J., Presutti, V., Nissim, M., Catenacci, C.: C-ODO: an OWL meta-model for collaborative ontology design. In: Alani, H., Noy, N., Stumme, G., Mika, P., Sure, Y., Vrandecic, D. (eds.) Workshop on Social and Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge (CKC 2007) at WWW 2007, Banff, Canada (2007)
  13. Hartmann, J., Sure, Y., Haase, P., Palma, R., del Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, M.: OMV - Ontology Metadata Vocabulary. In: Welty, C. (ed.) Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web Workshop, Galway, Ireland (2005)
  14. Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Auer, S., Brümmer, M.: Integrating NLP using linked data. In: Alani, H., Kagal, L., Fokoue, A., Groth, P., Biemann, C., Parreira, J.X., Aroyo, L., Noy, N., Welty, C., Janowicz, K. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 98-13. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRef
  15. Horridge, M., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Manchester Syntax. W3C working group note, World Wide Web Consortium, 2nd edn., December 2012
  16. Hyde, D.: Vagueness, Logic and Ontology. Ashgate New Critical Thinking in Philosophy. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)
  17. Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.-R.: Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2001), pp. 623-32. ACM Press, New York (2001)
  18. Kotis, K., Vouros, A.: Human-centered ontology engineering: the HCOME methodology. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 10(1), 109-31 (2006) CrossRef
  19. Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D.: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, April 2013
  20. Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LN
• 作者单位：Panos Alexopoulos (14)
  Silvio Peroni (15) (16)
  Boris Villazón-Terrazas (14)
  Jeff Z. Pan (17)
  José Manuel Gómez-Pérez (14)
  
  14. iSOCO, Madrid, Spain
  15. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  16. STLab-ISTC, CNR, Rome, Italy
  17. Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  
• ISSN：1611-3349

文摘

The emergence in the last years of initiatives like the Linked Open Data (LOD) has led to a significant increase in the amount of structured semantic data on the Web. Central role to this development has been played by ontologies, as these enable the representation of real world domains in an explicit and formal way and, thus, the production of commonly understood and shareable semantic data. Nevertheless, the shareability and wider reuse of such data can be hampered by the existence of vagueness within it, as this makes the data’s meaning less explicit. With that in mind, in this paper we present and evaluate the Vagueness Ontology, a metaontology that enables the explicit identification and description of vague entities and their vagueness-related characteristics in ontologies. The rationale is that such descriptions, when accompanying vague ontologies, may narrow the possible interpretations that the latter’s vague elements may assume by its users.