How to increase the potential policy impact of environmental science research
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Gary S Bilotta ; Alice M Milner ; Ian L Boyd
- 关键词：Policy ; Environmental science ; Study design ; Bias ; Statistical power ; Randomization ; Statistical validity ; Systematic review
- 刊名：Environmental Sciences Europe
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：December 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：27
- 期：1
- 全文大小：523 KB
- 参考文献：1. Boyd, I (2013) Research: a standard for policy-relevant science. Nature 501: pp. 159-60 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/501159a" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. Godfray, HCJ, Blacquière, T, Field, LM, Hails, RS, Petrokofsky, G, Potts, SG (2014) A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators. Proc R Soc B Sci 281: pp. 20140558 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0558" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
3. Peach, WJ, Lovett, LJ, Wotton, SR, Jeffs, C (2001) Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biol Conserv 101: pp. 361-73 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00083-0" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. Peterman, RM (1990) The importance of reporting statistical power: the forest decline and acidic deposition example. Ecology 71: pp. 2024-7 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937612" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. Reynolds, JH, Thompson, WL, Russell, B (2011) Planning for success: identifying effective and efficient survey designs for monitoring. Biol Conserv 144: pp. 1278-84 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.002" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
6. Legg, CJ, Nagy, L (2006) Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. J Environ Manag 78: pp. 194-9 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.016" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. Peterman, RM (1990) Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47: pp. 2-15 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f90-001" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
8. Manly, BF (1992) The design and analysis of research studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608384" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
9. Higgins, JP, Altman, DG, G?tzsche, PC, Jüni, P, Moher, D, Oxman, AD (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J 343: pp. d5928 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
10. Gluud, LL (2006) Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol 163: pp. 493-501 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj069" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
11. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8):iii, ix–xi.
Unlikely results: why most published scientific research is probably false.
12. Hartley, J, Sydes, M, Blurton, A (1996) Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient?. J Inf Sci 22: pp. 349-56 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159602200503" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
13. Simera, I, Moher, D, Hirst, A, Hoey, J, Schulz, KF, Altman, DG (2010) Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 8: pp. 24 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-24" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
14. Larsen, PO, Ins, M (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 84: pp. 575-603 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
15. Bilotta, GS, Milner, AM, Boyd, IL (2014) On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environ Sci Pol 42: pp. 67-77 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
16. Miller J, Rees G, Warnaars T, Young G, Shrestha A, Collins D. What is the evidence about glacier melt across the Himalayas? CEE Review 2012, 10-08. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence: levidence.org/SR10008.html" class="a-plus-plus">www.environmentalevidence.org/SR10008.html.
17. Sciberras M, Jenkins S, Kaiser M, Hawkins S, Pullin A. Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas. Environ. Evid. 2013; 2 (4). In: http:// levidencejournal.org/content/2/1/4" class="a-plus-plus">www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/2/1/4.
18. Johnson V, Fitzpatrick I, Floyd R, - 刊物主题：Environment, general; Pollution, general; Ecotoxicology;
- 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- ISSN：2190-4715
文摘
This article highlights eight common issues that limit the policy impact of environmental science research. The article also discusses what environmental scientists can do to resolve these issues, including (1) optimising the directness of their study so that it examines similar processes/populations/environments/ecosystems to that of policy interest; (2) using the most powerful study design possible, to increase confidence in the identified causal mechanisms; (3) selecting a sufficient sample size, to reduce the chance of false positives/negatives and increase policy-makers-confidence in extrapolation of the findings; (4) minimizing the risk of bias through randomization of study units to treatment and control groups (reducing the risk of selection bias), blinding of study units and investigators (reducing the risk of performance and detection bias), following-up study units from enrolment to study completion (reducing the risk of attrition bias) and prospectively registering the study on a publically-available platform (reducing the risk of reporting and publication bias); (5) proving that statistical analyses meet test assumptions by reporting the results of statistical assumption checks, ideally publishing full datasets online in an open-access format; (6) publishing the research whether statistically significant or not, policy-makers are just as interested in the negative or insignificant results as they are in the positive results; (7) making the study easy to find and use, the title and abstract of an article are of high importance in determining whether articles are examined in detail or not and used to inform policy; (8) contributing towards systematic reviews on environmental topics, to provide policy-makers with comprehensive, reproducible and updateable syntheses of all the evidence on a given topic.