Predicting the distribution of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) through ecological niche modelling with climate, soil, topography and socioeconomic factors
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Debabrata Ray ; Mukunda Dev Behera ; James Jacob
- 关键词：Hevea brasiliensis ; Future climate ; Maxent ; Species distribution model ; Land suitability
- 刊名：Ecological Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：January 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：31
- 期：1
- 页码：75-91
- 全文大小：2,071 KB
- 参考文献：Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistics (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232CrossRef
Araújo MB, Pearson RG (2005) Equilibrium of species’ distributions with climate. Ecography 28:693–695CrossRef
Araújo MB, Peterson TA (2012) Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modelling. Ecology 93:1527–1539CrossRef PubMed
Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 157:101–118CrossRef
Austin MP (2007) Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol Model 200:1–19CrossRef
Barve N (2008) Tool for partial-ROC. Version 1. Lawrence, KS: Biodiversity Institute. http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/handle/1808/10059 . Accessed 3 Mar 2015
Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:597–623CrossRef
Brush S, Perales H (2007) A maize landscape: ethnicity and agro-biodiversity in Chiapas Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:211–221CrossRef
Burger K, Smith HP (2004) Natural rubber planting policies and the outlook for prices and consumption. In: Jewtragoon P, Thainugul W (eds) Full texts of the international rubber tree conference
Chitale VS, Behera MD (2012) Can distribution of Sal (Shorea robusta) shift in north-eastern direction in India due to changing climate? Curr Sci 102:1126–1137
Coudun C, Ge´gout J, Piedallu C, Rameau J (2006) Soil nutritional factors improve models of plant species distribution: an illustration with Acer campestre (L.) in France. J Biogeogr 33:1750–1763CrossRef
Das G, Reju MJ, Mondal GC, Singh RP, Thapliyal AP, Chaudhuri D (2013) Adaptation of Hevea brasiliensis clones in three widely different cold prone areas of northeastern India. Indian J Plant Physiol 18:84–91CrossRef
Dormann CF (2007) Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic Appl Ecol 8(5):387–397CrossRef
Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant-soil system. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30:75–115CrossRef
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson KS, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRef
Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L (2004) An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J Appl Ecol 41:263–274CrossRef
Evans JM, Fletcher RJ, Alavalapati J (2010) Using species distribution models to identify suitable areas for biofuel feedstock production. GCB Bioenergy 2:63–78CrossRef
Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the measurement of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49CrossRef
Fischer G, Nachtergaele F, Prieler S, Velthuizen HT, Verelst L, Wiberg D (2008) Global agro-ecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy
Gallardo B, David C (2013) The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol 50:757–766CrossRef
Garcia K, Lasco R, Ines A, Lyon B, Pulhin F (2013) Predicting geographic distribution and habitat suitability due to climate change of selected threatened forest tree species in the Philippines. Appl Geogr 22:12–22CrossRef
Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models? Ecol Lett 8:993–1009CrossRef
Hanspach J, Ingolf K, Sven P, Stefan K (2010) Predictive performance of plant species distribution models depends on species traits. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2010.04.002
Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modelling methods. Ecography 29:773–785CrossRef
Heumann BW, Walsh SJ, McDaniel P (2011) An assessment of a presence-only model for crop suitability mapping, Nang Rong, Thailand. Ecol Inf 6:257–269CrossRef
Heumann BW, Walsh SJ, Verdery AM, McDaniel PM, Rindfuss RR (2013) Land suitability modeling using a geographic socio-environmental niche-based approach: a case study from north eastern Thailand. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103:764–784CrossRef
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRef
Hong LT (1999) Rubber tree wood- processing and utilisation. In: Hong LT, Sim HC (eds) Malayan forest records. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–15. ISBN 983-9592-27-0
Huntley B, Barnard P, Altwegg R, Chambers L, Coetzee BWT, Gibson L, Hockey PAR, Hole DG, Midgley GF, Underhill LG, Willis SG (2010) Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species’ range and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change. Ecography 33:621–626. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06023.x
Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant Biol 22:415–427CrossRef
INCCA (2010) Climate change and India: a 4x4 assessment. Indian Network For Climate Change Assessment. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India. www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/fin-rpt-incca.pdf . Accessed 21 May 2014
IPCC 2007 Fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 (AR4). Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland
IRSG (2014) Rubber tree industry report. International Rubber Tree Study Group, Singapore
ISRO 2012 Project report on geospatial technology for acreage estimation of natural rubber and identification of potential area for its cultivation, IRSO and Rubber Board, India, pp 10–21. http://www.nrsc.gov.in/pdf/prubber.pdf . Accessed 12 Apr 2014
Jacob J, Annamalainathan K, Alam B, Sathik MBM, Thapliyal AP, Devakumar AS (1999) Physiological constraints for cultivation of Hevea brasiliensis in certain unfavourable agroclimatic regions of India. Indian J Nat Rubber Res 12:1–16
Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2008) Usefulness of bioclimatic models for studying climate change and invasive species. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:1–24CrossRef PubMed
Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogr 17:145–151CrossRef
Maithani BP (2005) Shifting cultivation in north-east India: policy issues and options. Mittal, New Dheli
Meti S, Meerabai M, Jacob J, Saifudeen M (2014) Geospatial variability of soil and climate on performance of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) in traditional region of India. J Plant Crops 42:175–184
Mischler P, Kearney M, McCarroll JC, Scholte RGC, Vounatsou P, Malone JB (2012) Environmental and socio-economic risk modelling for Chagas disease in Bolivia. Geospatial Health 6:59–66CrossRef
Moraes VHF (1977) Rubber tree. In: Alvim PT, Kozlowski TT (eds) Eco-physiology of tropical crops. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 315–328CrossRef
Ouseph T (1996) Shortage of skilled tappers hits smallholdings. Rubber tree Asia. Dhanam Publication, Kochi
Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133:225–245CrossRef
Pearson RG, Dawson TE (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371CrossRef
Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78:419–433CrossRef PubMed
Peterson AT, Papes M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modelling. Ecol Model 213:63–72CrossRef
Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175CrossRef
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRef
Pradervand JN, Dubuis A, Pellissier L, Guisan A, Randin C (2014) Very high resolution environmental predictors in species distribution models moving beyond topography? Prog Phys Geogr 38:79–96CrossRef
Priyadarshan PM, Hoa TTT, Huasun H, De Gonçalves PdeS (2005) Yielding potential of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in sub-optimal environments. J Crop Improv 14(1/2):221–247CrossRef
Raj S, Das G, Pothen J, Dey SK (2005) Relationship between latex yield of Hevea brasiliensis and antecedent environmental factors. Int J Biometeorol 49:189–196CrossRef PubMed
Rao PS, Vijayakumar KR (1992) Climatic requirements. In: Sethuraj MR, Mathew NM (eds) Natural rubber: biology, cultivation and technology. Developments in crop science, vol 23. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 200–219CrossRef
Ray D, Behera MD, Jacob J (2014) Indian Brahmaputra valley offers significant potential for cultivation of rubber trees under changed climate. Curr Sci 107:461–469
Rubber Growers’ Companion (2014) A yearly publication of the rubber board, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Kottayam, Kerala
Rubber Statistics (2014) Department of statistics and planning, rubber board, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. Kottayam, Kerala, pp 15
Sehgal JL, Mandal DK, Mandal C, Vadivelu S (1992) Agro-ecological regions of India. In: Technical bulletin no. 24. National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use Planning, ICAR, India, pp 88–90
Sinha AK (2010) Rubber plantation in northeast India, hopes vs. concerns. The Tripura Foundation. http://thetripurafoundation.org/art-rubber-prospect-tripura-and-north-east
Slater H, Michael E (2012) Predicting the current and future potential distributions of lymphatic filariasis in Africa using maximum entropy ecological niche modelling. PLoS One 7(2):e32202. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032202 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Stockwell D, Peters D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13:143–158CrossRef
Sumitha S (2012) Bring in, living in, falling out: labour market transitions of Indian plantation sector—a survey. A NRPPD discussion paper. Centre for Development Studies, Kerala
Swets J (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293CrossRef PubMed
Tsoar A, Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D, Kadmon R (2007) A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Divers Distrib 13:397–405CrossRef
Tukey JW (1958) Bias and confidence in not quite large samples. Ann Math Stat 29:614CrossRef
Ureta C, Martinez-Meyer E, Perales HR, Alvarez-Buylla E (2012) Projecting the effects of climate change on the distribution of maize races and their wild relatives in Mexico. Glob Change Biol 18:1073–1082CrossRef
Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A (2008) NCEAS predicting species distributions working group. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib 14:763–773CrossRef
Wycherley PR (1992) The genus Hevea—botanical aspects. In: Sethuraj MR, Mathew NM (eds) Natural rubber: biology, cultivation and technology. Developments in crop science, vol 23. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 50–66CrossRef
Yang XQ, Kushwaha SPS, Saran S, Xu J, Roy PS (2013) Maxent modelling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicaadhatoda L. in lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol Eng 51:83–87CrossRef - 作者单位：Debabrata Ray (1) (2)
Mukunda Dev Behera (2)
James Jacob (3)
1. Regional Research Station, Rubber Research Institute of India, Agartala, Tripura, 799006, India
2. Centre for Oceans, Rivers, Atmosphere and Land Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India
3. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, Kerala, 686009, India - 刊物主题：Ecology; Plant Sciences; Zoology; Evolutionary Biology; Behavioural Sciences; Forestry;
- 出版者：Springer Japan
- ISSN：1440-1703
文摘
Identifying the factors that contribute to species distribution will help determine the impact of the changing climate on species’ range contraction and expansion. Ecological niche modelling is used to analyze the present and potential future distribution of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in two biogeographically distinct regions of India i.e., the Western Ghats (WG) and Northeast (NE). The rubber tree is an economically important plantation species, and therefore factors other than climate may play a significant role in determining its occurrence. To assist in future planning, we used the maximum entropy model to predict plausible areas for the expansion of rubber tree plantations under a changing climate scenario. Inclusion of elevation, soil and socioeconomic factors into the model did not result in a significant increase in the model accuracy estimates over the bioclimatic model (AUC > 0.92), but their effect was pronounced in the predicted probability scoring of species occurrence. Among various factors, elevation, rooting condition, village population and agricultural labour availability contributed substantially to the model in the NE region, whereas for the WG region, climate was the most important contributing factor for rubber tree distribution. We found that more areas would be suitable for rubber tree plantation in the NE region, whereas further expansion would be limited in the WG region under the projected climate scenario for 2050. Keywords Hevea brasiliensis Future climate Maxent Species distribution model Land suitability