A Value-Centric Model to Ground Norms and Requirements for ePartners of Children
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Alex Kayal (8)
Willem-Paul Brinkman (8)
Rianne Gouman (9)
Mark A. Neerincx (8)
M. Birna van Riemsdijk (8) - 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：1
- 期：1
- 页码：329-345
- 参考文献：1. Ali, R., Solís, C., Omoronyia, I., Salehie, M., Nuseibeh, B.: Social adaptation - when software gives users a voice. In: ENASE, pp. 75-4 (2012)
2. Andrighetto, G., Governatori, G., Noriega, P., van der Torre, L. (eds.): Normative Multi-Agent Systems. Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, vol. 4. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Wadern (2013)
3. Arciszewski, H.F.R., de Greef, T.E., van Delft, J.H.: Adaptive automation in a naval combat management system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A Syst. Humans 39(6), 1188-199 (2009) CrossRef
4. Russell Bernard, H.: Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek (1995)
5. Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., Weiss, A., Beck, E., Tscheligi, M.: Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing. Comput. Entertain. 6(1), 5:1-:23 (2008) CrossRef
6. Bernhaupt, R., Weiss, A., Obrist, M., Tscheligi, M.: Playful probing: making probing more fun. In: Baranauskas, C., Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds.) INTERACT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4662, pp. 606-19. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRef
7. Breazeal, C., Gray, J., Hoffman, G., Berlin, M.: Social robots: beyond tools to partners. In: 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004, pp. 551-56, Sept 2004
8. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P., Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading.: Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Report (Institute for Research on Learning), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1989)
9. Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions, 1st edn. Sage Publications, London (1998)
10. de Greef, T.E.: ePartners for dynamic task allocation and coordination. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology (2012)
11. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Utrecht (2004)
12. Figueiredo, K., Silva, V.: An algorithm to identify conflicts between norms and values. In: Balke, T., Dignum, F., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Chopra, A.K. (eds.) COIN 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8386, pp. 259-74. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
13. Fogli, D., Guida, G.: Knowledge-centered design of decision support systems for emergency management. Decis. Support Syst. 55(1), 336-47 (2013) CrossRef
14. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P.H.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1177-201. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (2003)
15. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21-9 (1999) CrossRef
16. Hansson, S.O.: Norms and values. Crítica 23(67), 3-3 (1991)
17. Blanson Henkemans, O.A., van der Boog, P.J.M., Lindenberg, J., van der Mast, C.A.P.G., Neerincx, M.A., Zwetsloot-Schonk, B.J.H.M.: An online lifestyle diary with a persuasive computer assistant providing feedback on self-management. Technol. Health Care 17, 253-57 (2009)
18. Hindriks, K., Neerincx, M.A., Vink, M.: The iCat as a natural interaction partner - playing go fish with a robot. In: Dechesne, F., Hattori, H., ter Mors, A., Such, J.M., Weyns, D., Dignum, F. (eds.) AAMAS 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 7068, pp. 212-31. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRef
19. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D.: Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 18(6), 583-00 (1983) CrossRef
20. Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., Bordini, R.H.: From organisation specification to normative programming in multi-agent organisations. In: Dix, J., Leite, J., Governatori, G., Jamroga, W. (eds.) CLIMA XI. LNCS, vol. 6245, pp. 117-34. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRef
21. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Developing organised multi-agent systems using the MOISE \(+\) model: programming issues at the system and agent levels. Int. J. Agent-Oriented Softw. Eng. 1, 370-95 (2007) CrossRef
22. Kreuger, R.A., Casey, M.A.: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4th edn. Pine Forge Press, Newbury Park (2008)
23. MacQueen, K., McLellan-Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., Milstein, B.: Team-based codebook development: structure, process, and agreement. In: Guest, G., MacQueen, K. (eds.) Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research. AltaMira, Lanham (2012)
24. Myers, K., Yorke-Smith, N.: A cognitive framework for delegation to an assistive user agent. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2005 Fall Symposium on Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving Assistants, pp. 94-9, Arlington, VA. AAAI Press, Nov 2005
25. Neerincx, M.A., Lindenberg, J.: Situated cognitive engineering for complex task environments. In: Schraagen, J.M.C., Militello, L., Ormerod, T., Lipshitz, R. (eds.) Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition, pp. 373-90. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)
26. Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1986)
27. Paping, C., Brinkman, W.P., van der Mast, C.: An Explorative Study into a Tele-delivered Multi-patient Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy System, pp. 203-19. IOS press, Amsterdam (2010)
28. Rokeach, M.: The Nature of Human Values. The Free Press, New York (1973)
29. Schmehl, S., Deutsch, S., Schrammel, J., Paletta, L., Tscheligi, M.: Directed cultural probes: detecting barriers in the usage of public transportation. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6946, pp. 404-11. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRef
30. Schroeder, M.: Value theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2012 edition, 2012th edn. CSLI, Stanford (2012)
31. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1998)
32. Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J.M., Jeffers, R.: KAoS: a policy and domain services framework for grid computing and semantic web services. In: Jensen, Ch., Poslad, S., Dimitrakos, T. (eds.) iTrust 2004. LNCS, vol. 2995, pp. 16-6. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRef
33. van de Poel, I.: Translating Values Into Design Requirements. Springer, Dordrecht (forthcoming)
34. van Diggelen, J., Neerincx, M.A.: Electronic partners that diagnose and guide and mediate space crew’s social and cognitive and affective processes. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behaviour 2010, pp. 73-6. Noldus Information Technology bv, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2010)
35. Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.P.M.: Modelling electronic organizations. In: Ma?ík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchou?ek, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, p. 584. Springer, Heidelberg (2003) CrossRef
36. López, F.L.y., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A normative framework for agent-based systems. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 12(2-), 227-50 (2006) - 作者单位：Alex Kayal (8)
Willem-Paul Brinkman (8)
Rianne Gouman (9)
Mark A. Neerincx (8)
M. Birna van Riemsdijk (8)
8. Interactive Intelligence Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
9. Thales Netherlands, Hengelo, The Netherlands - ISSN：1611-3349
文摘
Children as they grow up start to discover their neighborhood and surrounding areas and get increasingly involved in social interaction. We aim to support this process through a system of so-called electronic partners (ePartners) that function as teammates to their users. These ePartners should adapt their behavior to norms that govern the social contexts (e.g., the family or school) in which they are functioning. We argue that the envisaged normative framework for ePartners for children should be based on an understanding of the target domain that is grounded in user studies. It is the aim of this paper to provide such understanding, in particular answering the following questions: (1) what are the main elements that make up the social context of the target domain (family life), and how are they related?, and (2) what are the relationships between these elements of the social context and the normative framework in which we envision the ePartners to operate? To answer these questions we conducted focus groups sessions and a cultural probe study with parents and children. The transcripts from these sessions were analyzed using grounded theory, which has resulted in a grounded model that shows that (1) activities, concerns, and limitations related to family life are the main elements of the social context of this user group, and that all three elements are connected through the central concept of user values, and (2) norms can support these values by promoting activities, alleviating concerns and overcoming limitations. In this way the model provides the foundation for developing a normative framework to govern the behavior of ePartners for children, identifying user values as the starting point.