All-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears: A protocol for a randomized trial [NCT00128076]

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Joy C MacDermid (1) (2)
  Richard Holtby (3)
  Helen Razmjou (3)
  Dianne Bryant (4)
  
• 刊名：BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
• 出版年：2006
• 出版时间：December 2006
• 年：2006
• 卷：7
• 期：1
• 全文大小：623KB
• 参考文献：1. Jerosch J, Muller T, Castro WH: The incidence of rotator cuff rupture. An anatomic study. / Acta Orthop Belg 1991, 57:124-29.
  2. Hijioka A, Suzuki K, Nakamura T, Hojo T: Degenerative change and rotator cuff tears. An anatomical study in 160 shoulders of 80 cadavers. / Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993, 112:61-4. CrossRef
  3. Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD: The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. / Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1995, 54:30-1.
  4. Feng S, Guo S, Nobuhara K, Hashimoto J, Mimori K: Prognostic indicators for outcome following rotator cuff tear repair. / J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong ) 2003, 11:110-16.
  5. Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J: Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. / J South Orthop Assoc 2003, 12:23-6.
  6. Hirano M, Ide J, Takagi K: Acromial shapes and extension of rotator cuff tears: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002, 11:576-78. CrossRef
  7. Fuchs S, Chylarecki C, Langenbrinck A: Incidence and symptoms of clinically manifest rotator cuff lesions. / Int J Sports Med 1999, 20:201-05. CrossRef
  8. Rupp S: [Incidence of rotator cuff ruptures in asymptomatic shoulder joints in advanced age]. / Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997, 135:Oa9.
  9. Zakaria D: Rates of carpal tunnel syndrome, epicondylitis, and rotator cuff claims in Ontario workers during 1997. / Chronic Dis Can 2004, 25:32-9.
  10. Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R: Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999, 8:296-99. CrossRef
  11. Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M, Karahan M: Self-assessment of general health status in patients with five common shoulder conditions. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998, 7:228-37. CrossRef
  12. Ostor AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL: Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. / Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005.
  13. Zakaria D, Robertson J, MacDermid JC, Hartford K, Koval J: Estimating the population at risk for Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board-covered injuries or diseases. / Chronic Dis Can 2002, 23:17-1.
  14. Herberts P, Kadefors R, Hogfors C, Sigholm G: Shoulder pain and heavy manual labor. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984, 166-78.
  15. MacDermid JC, Ramos J, Drosdowech D, Faber K, Patterson S: The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004, 13:593-98. CrossRef
  16. McKee MD, Yoo DJ: The effect of surgery for rotator cuff disease on general health status. Results of a prospective trial. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82-A:970-79.
  17. Gerritsen AA, Uitdehaag BM, van Geldere D, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, Bouter LM: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. / Br J Surg 2001, 88:1285-295. CrossRef
  18. Norberg FB, Field LD, Savoie FHIII: Repair of the rotator cuff. Mini-open and arthroscopic repairs. / Clin Sports Med 2000, 19:77-9. CrossRef
  19. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K: The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:219-24.
  20. Yamaguchi K, Levine WN, Marra G, Galatz LM, Klepps S, Flatow EL: Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons. / Instr Course Lect 2003, 52:81-2.
  21. Bennett WF: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears (small-to-medium): A prospective study with 2- to 4-year follow-up. / Arthroscopy 2003, 19:249-56. CrossRef
  22. Gartsman GM: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. / Clin Orthop 2001, 95-06.
  23. Gartsman GM, O'connor DP: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a prospective, randomized study of one-year outcomes. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004, 13:424-26. CrossRef
  24. Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:832-40.
  25. Gartsman GM, Hammerman SM: Full-thickness tears: arthroscopic repair. / Orthop Clin North Am 1997, 28:83-8. CrossRef
  26. Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M: Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair for full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an outcome analysis. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:33-0. CrossRef
  27. Wilson F, Hinov V, Adams G: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up. / Arthroscopy 2002, 18:136-44. CrossRef
  28. Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Pearce CEJ: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair. / Arthroscopy 2001, 17:905-12. CrossRef
  29. Murray TFJ, Lajtai G, Mileski RM, Snyder SJ: Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002, 11:19-4. CrossRef
  30. Hersch JC, Sgaglione NA: Arthroscopically assisted mini-open rotator cuff repairs. Functional outcome at 2- to 7-year follow-up. / Am J Sports Med 2000, 28:301-11.
  31. Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM: All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison. / Arthroscopy 2003, 19:234-38. CrossRef
  32. Warner JJ, Tetreault P, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D: Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a cohort comparison study. / Arthroscopy 2005, 21:328-32. CrossRef
  33. Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I: Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up. / Arthroscopy 2003, 19:746-54. CrossRef
  34. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cina CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schunemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH: Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. / BMJ 2005, 330:88. CrossRef
  35. Solomon MJ, Pager CK, Young JM, Roberts R, Butow P: Patient entry into randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: factors influencing participation. / Surgery 2003, 133:608-13. CrossRef
  36. van der LW: Pitfalls in randomized surgical trials. / Surgery 1980, 87:258-62.
  37. van der LW: On the generalization of surgical trial results. / Acta Chir Scand 1980, 146:229-34.
  38. Green S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy. / BMJ 1998, 316:354-60.
  39. Grant HJ, Arthur A, Pichora DR: Evaluation of interventions for rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review. / J Hand Ther 2004, 17:274-99. CrossRef
  40. Roddey TS, Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Gartsman GM: The relationship among strength and mobility measures and self-report outcome scores in persons after rotator cuff repair surgery: impairment measures are not enough. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:95S-98S. CrossRef
  41. Lerner D, Amick BCIII, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D: The Work Limitations Questionnaire. / Med Care 2001, 39:72-5. CrossRef
  42. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S: / SF-12 How to score the Sf-12 Physical and Mental Summary Scales / 2 Edition Boston, Mass, The Health Institue, New England Medical Centre 2000.
  43. Walmsley RP, Hartsell H: Shoulder strength following surgical rotator cuff repair: a comparative analysis using isokinetic testing. / J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992, 15:215-22.
  44. Kirschenbaum D, Coyle MPJ, Leddy JP, Katsaros P, Tan FJ, Cody RP: Shoulder strength with rotator cuff tears. Pre- and postoperative analysis. / Clin Orthop 1993, 174-78.
  45. Yamakawa S, Hashizume H, Ichikawa N, Itadera E, Inoue H: Comparative studies of MRI and operative findings in rotator cuff tear. / Acta Med Okayama 2001, 55:261-68.
  46. Kyrola K, Niemitukia L, Jaroma H, Vaatainen U: Long-term MRI findings in operated rotator cuff tear. / Acta Radiol 2004, 45:526-33. CrossRef
  47. Goldsmith CH, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P: Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. / J Rheumatol 1993, 20:561-65.
  48. Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S: The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. / Clin J Sport Med 2003, 13:84-2. CrossRef
  49. MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D: Responsiveness of self-report measures following rotator cuff surgery (In press). / J Shld Elb Surg 2006.
  50. Getahun T, MacDermid JC, Patterson SD: Concurrent validity of patient rating scales in assessment of outcome after rotator cuff repair. / Journal of Musculoskeletal Research 2000, 4:119-27. CrossRef
  51. Research Committee ASES, Richards RS, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Ianotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD: A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. / J Should Elbow Surg 1994, 3:347-52. CrossRef
  52. Riddle DL, Lee KT, Stratford PW: Use of SF-36 and SF-12 health status measures: a quantitative comparison for groups versus individual patients. / Med Care 2001, 39:867-78. CrossRef
  53. Resnick B, Parker R: Simplified scoring and psychometrics of the revised 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. / Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 2001, 5:161-66.
  54. Walker N, Michaud K, Wolfe F: Work limitations among working persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability, and validity of the work limitations questionnaire in 836 patients. / J Rheumatol 2005, 32:1006-012.
  55. Blanchard CM, Cote I, Feeny D: Comparing short form and RAND physical and mental health summary scores: results from total hip arthroplasty and high-risk primary-care patients. / Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004, 20:230-35. CrossRef
  56. Muller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich SN: Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. / Heart 2004, 90:523-27. CrossRef
  57. Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZR, Murrell GA: Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. / Aust J Physiother 2001, 47:289-94.
  58. MacDermid JC, Chesworth BM, Patterson S, Roth JH: Intratester and intertester reliability of goniometric measurement of passive lateral shoulder rotation. / J Hand Ther 1999, 12:187-92.
  59. Bohannon RW: Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. / Phys Ther 1986, 66:206-09.
  60. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW: Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. / Phys Ther 1987, 67:931-33.
  61. Bohannon RW: Comparability of force measurements obtained with different strain gauge hand-held dynamometers. / J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993, 18:564-67.
  62. Balogun JA, Powell R, Trullender B, Olson S, Balogun AO: Intra- and inter-tester reliability of the NICHOLAS hand-held dynamometer during evaluation of upper extremity isometric muscle strength. / European Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1998, 8:48-3.
  63. Bankes MJ, Crossman JE, Emery RJ: A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998, 7:116-21. CrossRef
  64. Bankes MJ, Emery RJ: An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. / J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79:696.
  65. Conboy VB, Morris RW, Kiss J, Carr AJ: An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. / J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78:229-32.
  66. Constant CR: An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. / J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79:695-96.
  67. Grassi FA, Tajana MS: The normalization of data in the Constant-Murley score for the shoulder. A study conducted on 563 healthy subjects. / Chir Organi Mov 2003, 88:65-3.
  68. Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR: Normalization of the Constant score. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:279-85. CrossRef
  69. Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C: The Constant score in normal shoulders. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:128-33. CrossRef
  70. Constant CR, Murley AHG: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. / Clin Orthop 1987, 214:160-64.
  71. Wessel J, Razmjou H, Mewa Y, Holtby R: The factor validity of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. / BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005, 6:22. CrossRef
  72. Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence D, Baron C, Lee L: Reliability of goniometric measurements. / Phys Ther 1978, 58:1355-390.
  73. Hellebrandt FA, Duvall EN, Moore ML: The measurement of joint motion: Part III Reliability of goniometry. / Phys Ther Rev 1949, 29:302-07.
  74. Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: Shoulder measurements. / Phys Ther 1987, 67:668.
  75. Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM: Shoulder-Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Following Surgical Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator-Cuff Tears. / J Bone Joint Surg 1986, 68A:266-72.
  76. Kelly BT, Kadrmas WR, Speer KP: The manual muscle examination for rotator cuff strength. An electromyographic investigation. / Am J Sports Med 1996, 24:581-88. CrossRef
  77. Plotnikoff NA, MacIntyre DL: Test-retest reliability of glenohumeral internal and external rotator strength. / Clin J Sport Med 2002, 12:367-72. CrossRef
  78. Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD, Gallagher MA, Cuomo F: Strength after surgical repair of the rotator cuff. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996, 5:12-7. CrossRef
  79. Beaton DE, Richards RR: Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:882-90.
  80. Michener LA, Leggin BG: A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. / J Hand Ther 2001, 14:68-6.
  81. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. / J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002, 11:587-94. CrossRef
  82. Norquist BM, Goldberg BA, Matsen FAIII: Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears. / J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:838-42.
  83. Blevins FT, Warren RF, Cavo C, Altchek DW, Dines D, Palletta G, Wickiewicz TL: Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: results using a mini-open deltoid splitting approach. / Arthroscopy 1996, 12:50-9. CrossRef
  84. Liu SH, Baker CL: Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. / Arthroscopy 1994, 10:54-0. CrossRef
  85. Pollock RG, Flatow EL: The rotator cuff. Full-thickness tears. Mini-open repair. / Orthop Clin North Am 1997, 28:169-77. CrossRef
  86. Tauro JC: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. / Arthroscopy 1998, 14:45-1. CrossRef
  87. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. / Stat Med 2002, 21:1539-558. CrossRef
  88. Aiken LS, West SG: / Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions Newbury Park, London, Sage Publications. The International Professional Publishers 1991, 1-11.
  89. Klienbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE: / Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. / 2 Edition Boston, MA, PWS-Kent Publishing Co. 1988, 1:1-18.
  90. Frison LJ, Pocock SJ: Linearly divergent treatment effects in clinical trials with repeated measures: efficient analysis using summary statistics. / Stat Med 1997, 16:2855-872. CrossRef
  91. Frison L, Pocock SJ: Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. / Stat Med 1992, 11:1685-704. CrossRef
  92. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/25/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Joy C MacDermid (1) (2)
  Richard Holtby (3)
  Helen Razmjou (3)
  Dianne Bryant (4)
  
  1. School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. West, IAHS-403, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1C7, Canada
  2. Hand and Upper Limb Centre Clinical Research Laboratory, St. Joseph's Health Centre, 268 Grosvenor St., London, Ontario, N6A 3A8, Canada
  3. Orthopaedic & Arthritic Hospital, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 43 Wellesley St. East, Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada
  4. Department of Physical Therapy, Elborn College, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6G 1H1, Canada
  

文摘

Background Rotator cuff tears are the most common source of shoulder pain and disability. Only poor quality studies have compared mini-open to arthroscopic repair, leaving surgeons with inadequate evidence to support optimal, minimally-invasive repair. Methods/Design This randomized, multi-centre, national trial will determine whether an arthroscopic or mini-open repair provides better quality of life for patients with small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears. A national consensus meeting of investigators in the Joint Orthopaedic Initiative for National Trials of the Shoulder (JOINTS Canada) identified this question as the top priority for shoulder surgeons across Canada. The primary outcome measure is a valid quality-of-life scale (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC)) that addresses 5 domains of health affected by rotator cuff disease. Secondary outcomes will assess rotator cuff functionality (ROM, strength, Constant score), secondary dimensions of health (general health status (SF-12) and work limitations), and repair integrity (MRI). Outcomes are measured at baseline, at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively by blinded research assistants and musculoskeletal radiologists. Patients (n = 250) with small or medium-sized cuff tears identified by clinical examination and MRI who meet eligibility criteria will be recruited. This sample size will provide 80% power to statistically detect a clinically important difference of 20% in WORC scores between procedures after controlling for baseline WORC score (α = 0.05). A central methods centre will manage randomization, data management, and monitoring under supervision of experienced epidemiologists. Surgeons will participate in either conventional or expertise-based designs according to defined criteria to avoid biases from differential surgeon expertise. Mini-open or all-arthroscopic repair procedures will be performed according to a standardized protocol. Central Adjudication (of cases), Trial Oversight and Safety Committees will monitor trial conduct. We will use an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), where the baseline WORC score is used as a covariate, to compare the quality of life (WORC score) at 2 years post-operatively. As a secondary analysis, we will conduct the same statistical test but will include age and tear size as covariates with the baseline score. Enrollment will require 2 years and follow-up an additional 2 years. The trial will commence when funding is in place. Discussion These results will have immediate impact on the practice behaviors of practicing surgeons and surgical trainees at JOINTS centres across Canada. JOINTS Canada is actively engaged in knowledge exchange and will publish and present findings internationally to facilitate wider application. This trial will establish definitive evidence on this question at an international level.