Physical Education and Student Activity: Evaluating Implementation of a New Policy in Los Angeles Public Schools

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Mariah Lafleur MPH (1)
  Seth Strongin MS (2)
  Brian L. Cole DrPH (3)
  Sally Lawrence Bullock MPH (1)
  Rajni Banthia PhD (1)
  Lisa Craypo MPH (1)
  Ramya Sivasubramanian JD (2)
  Sarah Samuels DrPH (1)
  Robert García JD (2)
  
• 关键词：Physical education ; Schools ; Policy ; Children ; Adolescents ; Physical activity
• 刊名：Annals of Behavioral Medicine
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：February 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：45
• 期：1-supp
• 页码：122-130
• 全文大小：185KB
• 参考文献：1. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. / Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. CrossRef
  2. Sallis JF, Patrick K. Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: Consensus statement. / Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1994;6:302-314.
  3. Williams CL, Hayman LL, Daniels SR, et al. Cardiovascular health in childhood: A statement for health professionals from the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. / Circulation. 2002;106:143-160. CrossRef
  4. Pate RR, Trost SM, Williams C. Critique of existing guidelines for physical activity in young people. In: Biddle S, Sallis J, Cavill N, eds. / Young and Active? Young People and Health Enhancing Physical Activity: Evidence and Implications. London: Health Education Authority; 1998:162-176.
  5. Caspersen CJ, Nixon PA, DuRant RH. Physical activity epidemiology applied to children and adolescents. / Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1998;26:341-403. CrossRef
  6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Hyatsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
  7. Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Valimaki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A 21-year tracking study. / Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:267-273. CrossRef
  8. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical education’s role in public health. / Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62:124-137.
  9. Dobbins M, De Corby K, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1):CD007651.
  10. Datar A, Sturm R. Physical education in elementary school and body mass index: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. / Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1501-1506. CrossRef
  11. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. / Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:10. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-10 . CrossRef
  12. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. / Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):58-65. CrossRef
  13. Sallis J, McKenzie T, Kolody B, et al. Effects of health-related physical education on academic achievement: Project SPARK. / Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70:127-134.
  14. San Diego State University. Physical Education Matters. A Full Report from The California Endowment. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment; October 2007.
  15. UCLA Center to Eliminate Health Disparities and Samuels & Associates. Failing Fitness: Physical Activity and Physical Education in Schools. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment; January 2007.
  16. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. The built environment: Designing communities to promote physical activity in children. / Pediatrics. 2009;123:1591-1598. CrossRef
  17. Los Angeles Unified School District, fingertip facts 2011-012. Available at http://notebook.lausd.net/pls/ptl/url/ITEM/169C2AFC29A610A4E0430A081FB510A4. Accessibility verified March 18, 2012.
  18. LAUSD’s 2010-011 District Report. Education data partnership: Fiscal, demographic and performance data on California’s K-12 schools. Available at http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/App_Resx/EdDataClassic/fsTwoPanel.aspx?#!bottom=/_layouts/EdDataClassic/profile.asp?tab=1&level=06&ReportNumber=16&County=19&fyr=1011&District=64733#studentsbyrace/ethnicity. Accessibility verified March 25, 2012.
  19. California Department of Education. 2010-1 California physical fitness report. Overall—Summary of results: Los Angeles Unified District. Available at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/PhysFitness/PFTDN/Summary2011.aspx?r=0&t=2&y=2010-11&c=19647330000000&n=0000. Accessibility verified July 3, 2012.
  20. California Department of Education. 2008-009 California physical fitness report: Los Angeles unified summary of results. Available at http://bit.ly/pXHCMH. Accessibility verified March 18, 2012.
  21. California Department of Education. Physical education model content standards for California Public Schools; kindergarten through grade twelve. 2005. Available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/pestandards.pdf. Accessibility verified March 18, 2012.
  22. Data obtained by The City Project from the California Department of Education under the California Public Records Act. February 18, 2010.
  23. Los Angeles Unified School District. Policy bulletin: Physical education programs—Grades K-12 (BUL-2528.1). December 2009.
  24. García R, Fenwick C. Social science, equal justice, and public health policy: Lessons from Los Angeles. / J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:S26-S32. The City Project was part of the campaign and is part of the research team for this article. CrossRef
  25. García R, Fenwick C. Social science, equal justice, and public health policy: Lessons from Los Angeles. / J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:S26-S32. CrossRef
  26. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Moving into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education, 2nd Edition. 2004. Available at http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/standards/nationalstandards/pestandards.cfm. Accessibility verified Oct 11, 2012.
  27. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The four components of a high-quality physical education program. Available at http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/publications/teachingTools/QualityPE.cfm. Accessibility verified March 18, 2012.
  28. California Department of Education. Physical education framework for California Schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. 2009. Available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/documents/peframework2009.pdf. p. 227 Accessibility verified March 18, 2012.
  29. Sallis JF. Epidemiology of physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents. / Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1993;33(4-):403-408. CrossRef
  30. McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR. SOFIT: System for observing fitness instruction time. / J Teach Phys Educ. 1991;11(2):195-205.
  31. Heath EM, Coleman KJ, Lensegrav TL, Fallon JA. Using momentary time sampling to estimate minutes of physical activity in physical education: Validation of scores for the system for observing fitness instruction time. / Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77(1):142-146. CrossRef
  32. McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR, et al. BEACHES: An observational system for assessing children’s eating and physical activity behaviors and associated events. / J Appl Behav Anal. 1991;24(1):141-151. CrossRef
  33. Rowe P, van der Mars H, Schuldheisz J, Fox S. Measuring students-physical activity levels: Validating SOFIT for use with high-school students. / J Teach Phys Educ. 2004;23(3):235-251.
  34. McKenzie TL, Marshall SJ, Sallis JF, Conway TL. Student activity levels, lesson context, and teacher behavior during middle school physical education. / Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:249-259.
  35. McKenzie TL, Catellier DJ, Conway T, et al. Girls-activity levels and lesson contexts in middle school physical education: TAAG baseline. / Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1229-1235. CrossRef
  36. Fairclough S, Stratton G. Physical activity levels in middle and high school physical education: A review. / Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2005;17:217-236.
  37. van Beurden E, Barnett LM, Zask A, Dietrich UC, Brooks LO, Beard J. Can we skill and activate children through primary school physical education lessons? “Move it groove it”—A collaborative health promotion intervention. / Prev Med. 2003;36(4):493-501. CrossRef
  38. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development Network. Frequency and intensity of activity of third-grade children in physical education. / Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:185-190.
  39. Barroso CS, Kelder SH, Springer AE, et al. Senate Bill 42: Implementation and impact on physical activity in middle schools. / J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(3 Suppl):S82-S90. CrossRef
  40. Phillips MM, Raczynski JM, West DS, et al. Changes in school environments with implementation of Arkansas Act 1220 of 2003. / Obesity. 2010;18(1):S54-S61. CrossRef
  41. Amis JM, Wright PM, Dyson B, Vardaman JM, Ferry H. Implementing childhood obesity policy in a new educational environment: The cases of Mississippi and Tennessee. / Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1406-1413. Epub 2012 Mar 15. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Mariah Lafleur MPH (1)
  Seth Strongin MS (2)
  Brian L. Cole DrPH (3)
  Sally Lawrence Bullock MPH (1)
  Rajni Banthia PhD (1)
  Lisa Craypo MPH (1)
  Ramya Sivasubramanian JD (2)
  Sarah Samuels DrPH (1)
  Robert García JD (2)
  
  1. Samuels & Associates, 1222 Preservation Way, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
  2. The City Project, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  3. School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  

文摘

Background California law has standards for physical education (PE) instruction in K-12 public schools; audits found that the Los Angeles Unified School District did not enforce the standards. In 2009, the district adopted a PE policy to comply with these standards. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the PE policy in district schools. Methods PE class observations were conducted using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time in the 2010-011 and 2011-012 school years in an income-stratified random sample of 34 elementary, middle, and high schools to assess changes in PE class size, class duration, and time students spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Results PE class duration increased in high-income elementary schools. Mean class size decreased in low-income middle schools. Conclusions There was limited implementation of the PE policy 2?years after passage. Opportunities exist to continue monitoring and improving PE quantity and quality.