FBS Linkage ontology and technique to support engineering change management
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Bahram Hamraz ; Nicholas H. M. Caldwell ; Tom W. Ridgman…
- 关键词：Engineering change management ; Change prediction ; Functional reasoning ; Multi ; domain model
- 刊名：Research in Engineering Design
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：January 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：26
- 期：1
- 页码：3-35
- 全文大小：7,776 KB
- 参考文献：1. Ahmad N, Wynn DC, Clarkson PJ (2011b) The evolution of information while building cross-domain models of a design: a video experiment. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design (ICED-1), Copenhagen, Denmark
2. Ahmed S, Kanike Y (2007) Engineering change during a product’s lifecycle. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design (ICED-7), Paris, France
3. Albers A, Braun A, Sadowski E, Wynn DC, Wyatt DF, Clarkson PJ (2011) System architecture modeling in a software tool based on the contact and channel approach (C&C-A). J Mech Des 133(10):101006-01008. doi:10.1115/1.4004971 CrossRef
4. Altshuller G (1984) Creativity as an exact science. Gordon and Breach Science, New York
5. Blessing LTM, Chakrabarti A (2009) DRM, a design research methodology. Springer, London CrossRef
6. Boerstring P, Keller R, Alink T, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2008) The relationship between functions and requirements for an improved detection of component linkages. Paper presented at the international design conference (DESIGN-8), Dubrovnik, Croatia
7. Chandrasekaran B (2005) Representing function: Relating functional representation and functional modeling research streams. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf (AIEDAM) 19(2):65-4
8. Clarkson PJ, Hamilton JR (2000) ‘Signposting- a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Res Eng Des 12(1):18-8 CrossRef
9. Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert CM (2001b) Change prediction for product redesign. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design (ICED-1), Glasgow, UK
10. Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert CM (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. J Mech Des 126(5):788-97 CrossRef
11. Cohen T, Fulton RE (1998) A data approach to tracking and evaluating engineering changes. Paper presented at the ASME design engineering technical conference (DETC-8), Atlanta, GA, USA
12. Cohen T, Navathe SB, Fulton RE (2000) C-FAR, change favorable representation. CAD Comput Aided Des 32(5):321-38 CrossRef
13. Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ, Zanker W (2004) Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Res Eng Des 15(1):1-1 CrossRef
14. Eckert C, Alink T, Ruckpaul A, Albers A (2011) Different notions of function: results from an experiment on the analysis of an existing product. J Eng Des 22(11-2):811-37. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.603297 CrossRef
15. Erden MS, Komoto H, van Beek TJ, D’Amelio V, Echavarria E, Tomiyama T (2008) A review of function modeling: approaches and applications. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf (AIEDAM) 22(2):147-69. doi:10.1017/S0890060408000103
16. Far BH, Elamy AH (2005) Functional reasoning theories: problems and perspectives. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf (AIEDAM) 19(2):75-8. doi:10.1017/s0890060405050080
17. Fei G, Gao J, Owodunni D, Tang X (2011a) A model-driven and knowledge-based methodology for engineering design change management. Comput Aided Des Appl 8(3):373-82
18. Fei G, Gao J, Owodunni OO, Tang X (2011b) A method for engineering design change analysis using system modelling and knowledge management techniques. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(6):535-51. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2011.562544 CrossRef
19. Fricke E, Gebhard B, Negele H, Igenbergs E (2000) Coping with changes: causes, findings, and strategies. Syst Eng 3(4):169-79 CrossRef
20. Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11(4):26-6
21. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25(4):373-91 mputer-Aided Engineering and Design - 出版者：Springer London
- ISSN：1435-6066
文摘
Engineering changes are essential for any product development, and their management has become a crucial discipline. Research in engineering change management has brought about some methods and tools to support dealing with changes. This work extends the change prediction method through incorporation of a function–behaviour–structure (FBS) scheme. These additional levels of detail provide the rationales for change propagation and allow a more proactive management of changes. First, we develop the ontology of this method based on a comprehensive comparison of three seminal functional reasoning schemes. Then, we demonstrate the FBS Linkage technique by applying it to a diesel engine. Finally, we evaluate the method.