Energy from waste: generation potential and mitigation opportunity
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Francesco Bosello (1) (2) (3)
Lorenza Campagnolo (1) (4)
Fabio Eboli (1) (2) (4)
Ramiro Parrado (1) (2) (4) - 关键词：Climate change ; Mitigation ; Energy from waste ; C68 ; E27 ; Q42 ; Q43 ; Q54
- 刊名：Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：October 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：14
- 期：4
- 页码：403-420
- 全文大小：763KB
- 参考文献：1. Bianchi D (2008) Il Riciclo Ecoefficiente—Performance e Scenari Economici, Ambientali ed Energetici. Edizioni Ambiente, Milano
2. Bohringer C, Rutherford T, Tol R (2009) The EU 20/20/20 targets: an overview of the EMF22 assessment. Energy Econ 31:268-73 CrossRef
3. Bosello F, Botteri M, Campagnolo L, Carraro C, Eboli F, Medoro M, Parrado R (2010) Energia da Rifiuti in Italia: Potenzialità di Generazione e Contributo alle Politiche di Mitigazione dei Cambiamenti Climatici. http://www.ecocerved.it/Download/2010-E=mc2_Relazione.pdf
4. Burniaux J-M, Truong TP (2002) GTAP-E: an energy environmental version of the GTAP model. GTAP technical paper no. 16
5. Burniaux JM, Nicoletti G, Oliveira-Martins J (1992) GREEN: a global model for quantifying the costs of policies to curb CO2 emissions. OECD Econ Stud 19
6. Consonni S, Giugliano M, Grosso M (2005) Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste. Part B: emission and cost estimates. Waste Manage (Oxf) 25:137-48 CrossRef
7. Delhotal C, de la Chesnaye F, Gardiner A, Bates J, Sankovski A (2006) Estimating potential reductions of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry. In: de la Chesnaye FC, Weyant J (eds) Energy J Spec Issue Multi Greenhouse Gas Mitig Clim Policy
8. Eboli F, Parrado R, Roson R (2010) Climate change feedback on economic growth: explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model. Environ Dev Econ 15(5):515-33 CrossRef
9. EC-European Commission (2007) Limiting global climate change to 2 degrees Celsius. The way ahead for 2020 and beyond, COM/2007/2
10. ENEA (2006) Rapporto sul Recupero Energetico da Rifiuti Urbani in Italia, Roma
11. EP-European Parliament (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC
12. EUROBSERVER (2009) Interactive EUROBSERV database. http://www.eurobserv-er.org/
13. European IPPC Bureau (2006a) Waste management, best avalable techniques reference documents
14. European IPPC Bureau (2006b) Waste incineration, best available techniques reference documents
15. Gottinger HW (1998) Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. J Policy Model 20(5):537-80 CrossRef
16. IEA-International Energy Agency (2009a) Energy balances of OECD countries—extended balances
17. IEA-International Energy Agency (2009b) Energy balances of non-OECD countries—extended balances
18. IPCC (2007) Waste management, chapter 10 of contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch
19. ISPRA (2009) Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-National Inventory Report 2009. http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/4771.php
20. Leimback M, Bauer N, Baumstark L, Lüken M, Edenhofer O (2010) Technological change and international trade—insights from REMIND-R. Energy J 31(2):109-36
21. Monni S, Pipatti R, Lehtil? A, Savolainen I Syri S (2006) Global climate change mitigation scenarios for solid waste management. Technical Research Centre of Finland, vol 603. VTT Publications, Espoo, pp 51
22. Narayanan BG, Walmsley TL (2008) Global trade, assistance, and production: the GTAP 7 data base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
23. Sue Wing I (2008) The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework. Energy Econ 30:547-73
24. UN (2002) International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities-ISIC Rev. 3.1. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc02/isic.pdf
25. UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
26. US Energy Information Administration (2007) Annual energy outlook 2007—with projections to 2030, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, US Department of Energy, Washington
27. Wajsman N (1995) The use of computable general equilibrium models in evaluating environmental policy. J Environ Manage 44:127-43 CrossRef - 作者单位：Francesco Bosello (1) (2) (3)
Lorenza Campagnolo (1) (4)
Fabio Eboli (1) (2) (4)
Ramiro Parrado (1) (2) (4)
1. FEEM (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei), San Giorgio Maggiore Island, 8, 30124, Venice, Italy
2. CMCC (Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change), Via Augusto Imperatore 16, 73100, Lecce, Italy
3. University of Milan, Via Conservatorio, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
4. University of Venice Ca-Foscari, Dorsoduro 3246, 30123, Venice, Italy
文摘
The present research proposes a macroeconomic assessment of the role of waste incineration with energy recovery (WtE) and controlled landfill biogas to electricity generation and their potential contribution to a CO2 emission reduction policy, within a recursive-dynamic computable general equilibrium model. From the modeling viewpoint, introducing these energy sectors in such a framework required both the extension of the GTAP7 database and the improvement of the ICES production nested function. We focus our analysis on Italy as a signatory of the GHG reduction commitment of 20?% by 2020 with respect to 1990 levels proposed by the European Community; the rest of the world is represented by 21 geo-political countries/regions. It is shown that albeit in the near future WtE and landfill biogas will continue to represent a limited share of energy inputs in electricity sector (in Italy, around 2?% for WtE and 0.6?% for biogas in 2020), and they could play a role in a mitigation policy context. The GDP cost of the EU emission reduction target for the Italian economy can indeed be reduced by 1?% when the two energy generating options are available. In absolute terms, this translates into an annuitized value of 87-22?million ?