Security and cost comparison of INR self-testing and conventional hospital INR testing in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Qiu-lin Chen ; Li Dong ; Yi-jun Dong ; Shu-lin Zhao…
- 关键词：Heart valve replacement ; Anticoagulation therapy ; Portable coagulometer ; Self ; testing ; Cost
- 刊名：Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：December 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：10
- 期：1
- 全文大小：680 KB
- 参考文献：1. Zheng-Xiang L. Development of Cardiac Valve Disease Treatment. Ling Nan Angiocardiopathy Magazine. 2010;201(05):343-1.
2. Dong L, Xu Jian P, Shi Ying K. Phasal Progress of Study on the Anticoagulation Individualization and Low Anticoagulation Standard after Valve Disease Sugery. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;2013(01):1-.
3. Shah SG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Hone K, Kaczmarski R. Factors determining patients' intentions to use point-of-care testing medical devices for self-monitoring: the case of international normalized ratio self-testing. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;2013(7):1-4.
4. Bussey HI, Linn WD. Warfarin and aspirin after heart-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(7):508-.
5. Butchart EG, Payne N, Li HH, Buchan K, Mandana K, Grunkemeier GL. Better anticoagulation control improves survival after valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(4):715-3. 2002-04-01. CrossRef
6. Li D, Kang SY, Tian Zi P. Low Intensity Anticoagulant Therapy after Cardiac Mechanical Valve Replacement Surgery [J]. Chin J Surg. 2003;41(4):250-.
7. Kneeland PP, Fang MC. Current issues in patient adherence and persistence: focus on anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:51-0. 2010-01-20.
8. Horstkotte D, Piper C, Wiemer M. Optimal Frequency of Patient Monitoring and Intensity of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998;5(Suppl 1(3)):19-4. 1998-01-01. CrossRef
9. Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, Bankhead C, Fuller A, et al. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):322-4. 2012-01-28. CrossRef
10. Koertke H, Zittermann A, Wagner O, Koerfer R. Self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy improves long-term survival in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(1):24-. 2007-01-01. CrossRef
11. Holm T, Deutch S, Lassen JF, Jastrup B, Husted SE, Heickendorff L. Prospective evaluation of the quality of oral anticoagulation management in an outpatient clinic and in general practices. Thromb Res. 2002;105(2):103-. 2002-01-15. CrossRef
12. Heneghan C, Alonso-Coello P, Garcia-Alamino JM, Perera R, Meats E, Glasziou P. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9508):404-1. 2006-02-04. CrossRef
13. Grunau BE, Wiens MO, Harder KK. Patient self-management of warfarin therapy: pragmatic feasibility study in Canadian primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(8):e292-. 2011-08-01.
14. Yang J, Liu HY, Zhang Zhen L. Coagu Chek XS Clinical Application of National Standard Standardized Ratio Tester [J]. Ling Nan Angiocardiopathy Magazine. 2009;5:018.
15. Hong L, Chen Dai Y, Zhou Y, Lv Shu Z. Preliminary Study on the Clinical Application of Portable Coagulometer [J]. Chin J Cardiol. 2008;36(1):90.
16. Thompson JL, Sundt TM, Sarano ME, Santrach PJ, Schaff HV. In-Patient International Normalized Ratio Self-Testing Instruction After Mechanical Heart Valve Implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(6):2046-0. 51" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. Wells PS, Brown A, Jaffey J, McGahan L, Poon MC, Cimon K. Safety and effectiveness of point-of-care monitoring devices in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy: a meta-analysis. Open Med. 2007;1(3):e131-6. 2007-01-20.
18. Fairweather RB, Ansell J, van den Besselaar AM, Brandt JT, Bussey HI, Poller L, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXI on laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy: laboratory monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122(9):768-1. 1998-09-01.
19. Bereznicki LR, Jackson SL, Peterson GM, Jeffrey EC, Marsden KA, Jupe DM. Accuracy and clinical utility of the CoaguChek XS portable international normalised ratio monitor in a pilot study of warfarin home-monitoring. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(3):311-. 2007-03-01.- 刊物主题：Cardiac Surgery; Thoracic Surgery;
- 出版者：BioMed Central
- ISSN：1749-8090
文摘
Background International normalized ratio (INR) self-testing can improve the management of anticoagulation therapy with warfarin for the patients following mechanical heart valve replacement. Several reviews and studies have demonstrated self-management as an option to improve patient’s outcome considerably after mechanical heart valve replacement. We sought to analyze the security, economy and discuss the prospect of self-testing of anticoagulation therapy in patients following mechanical heart valve replacement in China, and evaluate the accuracy and stability of CoaguChek XS portable INR-testing device. Methods This was a prospective self-controlled clinical study conducted with 526 patients receiving oral warfarin anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement in the period of Mar.1, 2012 -Nov.1, 2012 in Cardiovascular Surgery Department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The same patient performed INR testing with CoaguChek XS portable coagulometer (group1) and central lab (group 2) in parallel. The follow-up time was 6?months. Meanwhile, a questionnaire was handed out to survey the expenses required for the re-examination visits to the hospital, time, and anticoagulation complications. Results No severe anticoagulation complications occurred in all the patients. No significant difference of the INR results were observed between group 1 and group 2, they showed significant relevance, r--.953(p--.05). Compared with the conventional method of INR testing in hospital, the portable coagulometer is convenient, quick and less traumatic. Self-testing of anticoagulation therapy reduced the cost and the time required for re-examination. Conclusions Results of CoaguChek XS monitor are precise and have a good consistency and stability as compared with traditional laboratory testing. For the patients receiving anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement, the self-testing of anticoagulation therapy with portable coagulometer is a safe choice, and it has a promising future application in China.