A comparison of particulate and Onyx embolization in preoperative devascularization of carotid body tumors

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Julius Griauzde ; Joseph J. Gemmete ; Neeraj Chaudhary ; Aditya S. Pandey…
• 关键词：Carotid body tumor ; Preoperative embolization ; Direct percutaneous embolization with Onyx ; Transarterial particulate embolization ; Outcomes
• 刊名：Neuroradiology
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：September 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：55
• 期：9
• 页码：1113-1118
• 全文大小：257KB
• 参考文献：1. Erickson D, Kudva YC, Ebersold MJ, Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA et al (2001) Benign paragangliomas: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in 236 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5210-216 CrossRef
  2. Netterville JL, Reilly KM, Robertson D, Reiber ME, Armstrong WB, Childs P (1995) Carotid body tumors: a review of 30 patients with 46 tumors. Laryngoscope 105:115-26 CrossRef
  3. Li J, Wang S, Zee C, Yang J, Chen W, Zhuang W et al (2010) Preoperative angiography and transarterial embolization in the management of carotid body tumor: a single-center, 10-year experience. Neurosurgery 67:941-48, discussion 8 CrossRef
  4. Wanke I, Jackel MC, Goericke S, Panagiotopoulos V, Dietrich U, Forsting M (2009) Percutaneous embolization of carotid paragangliomas using solely Onyx. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1594-597 CrossRef
  5. Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey A, Gandhi D, Sullivan SE, Marentette LJ et al (2010) Usefulness of percutaneously injected ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer in conjunction with standard endovascular embolization techniques for preoperative devascularization of hypervascular head and neck tumors: technique, initial experience, and correlation with surgical observations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:961-66 CrossRef
  6. Shah HM, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Ansari SA (2012) Preliminary experience with the percutaneous embolization of paragangliomas at the carotid bifurcation using only ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) Onyx. J Neurointerv Surg 4:125-29 CrossRef
  7. Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, McHugh JB, Marentette LJ (2011) Complete devascularization of a juvenile angiofibroma by direct percutaneous embolization with only ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx) through a single needle placement. J Neurointerv Surg 3:191-93 CrossRef
  8. Persky MS, Setton A, Niimi Y, Hartman J, Frank D, Berenstein A (2002) Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck paragangliomas—a team approach. Head Neck 24:423-31 CrossRef
  9. Unlu Y, Becit N, Ceviz M, Kocak H (2009) Management of carotid body tumors and familial paragangliomas: review of 30 years' experience. Ann Vasc Surg 23:616-20 CrossRef
  10. Liapis CD, Evangelidakis EL, Papavassiliou VG, Kakisis JD, Gougoulakis AG, Polyzos AK et al (2000) Role of malignancy and preoperative embolization in the management of carotid body tumors. World J Surg 24:1526-530 CrossRef
  11. Pacheco-Ojeda L (2001) Malignant carotid body tumors: report of three cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:36-0
  12. Kollert M, Minovi AA, Draf W, Bockmuhl U (2006) Cervical paragangliomas—tumor control and long-term functional results after surgery. Skull Base 16:185-91 CrossRef
  13. Kotelis D, Rizos T, Geisbusch P, Attigah N, Ringleb P, Hacke W et al (2009) Late outcome after surgical management of carotid body tumors from a 20-year single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:339-44 CrossRef
  14. Papaspyrou K, Mann WJ, Amedee RG (2009) Management of head and neck paragangliomas: review of 120 patients. Head Neck 31:381-87 CrossRef
  15. Patetsios P, Gable DR, Garrett WV, Lamont JP, Kuhn JA, Shutze WP et al (2002) Management of carotid body paragangliomas and review of a 30-year experience. Ann Vasc Surg 16:331-38 CrossRef
  16. Tikkakoski T, Luotonen J, Leinonen S, Siniluoto T, Heikkila O, Paivansalo M et al (1997) Preoperative embolization in the management of neck paragangliomas. Laryngoscope 107:821-26 CrossRef
  17. Abud DG, Mounayer C, Benndorf G, Piotin M, Spelle L, Moret J (2004) Intratumoral injection of cyanoacrylate glue in head and neck paragangliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1457-462
  18. Gemmete JJ, Pandey AS, Chaudhary N, Potti TA (2012) Paradoxical embolus to the brain from embolization of a carotid body tumor. J Neurointerv Surg 4:e12 CrossRef
  19. Chaloupka JC, Mangla S, Huddle DC, Roth TC, Mitra S, Ross DA et al (1999) Evolving experience with direct puncture therapeutic embolization for adjunctive and palliative management of head and neck hypervascular neoplasms. Laryngoscope 109:1864-872 CrossRef
  20. Ozyer U, Harman A, Yildirim E, Aytekin C, Akay TH, Boyvat F (2010) Devascularization of head and neck paragangliomas by direct percutaneous embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:967-75 CrossRef
  21. Elhammady MS, Wolfe SQ, Ashour R, Farhat H, Moftakhar R, Lieber BB et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of vascular tumor embolization using Onyx: is angiographic devascularization sufficient? J Neurosurg 112:1039-045 CrossRef
  22. Elhammady MS, Farhat H, Ziayee H, Aziz-Sultan MA (2009) Direct percutaneous embolization of a carotid body tumor with Onyx. J Neurosurg 110:124-27 CrossRef
  23. Harman M, Etlik O, Unal O (2004) Direct percutaneous embolization of a carotid body tumor with n-butyl cyanoacrylate: an alternative method to endovascular embolization. Acta Radiol 45:646-48 CrossRef
  24. Gobin YP, Murayama Y, Milanese K, Chow K, Gonzalez NR, Duckwiler GR et al (2001) Head and neck hypervascular lesions: embolization with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer—laboratory evaluation in swine and clinical evaluation in humans. Radiology 221:309-17 CrossRef
  25. Casasco A, Houdart E, Biondi A, Jhaveri HS, Herbreteau D, Aymard A et al (1999) Major complications of percutaneous embolization of skull-base tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:179-81
  26. Krishnamoorthy T, Gupta AK, Rajan JE, Thomas B (2007) Stroke from delayed embolization of polymerized glue following percutaneous direct injection of a carotid body tumor. Korean J Radiol 8:249-53 CrossRef
  27. Arya S, Rao V, Juvekar S, Dcruz AK (2008) Carotid body tumors: objective criteria to predict the Shamblin group on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1349-354 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Julius Griauzde (1)
  Joseph J. Gemmete (2) (3) (4)
  Neeraj Chaudhary (2) (3)
  Aditya S. Pandey (2) (3)
  Steven E. Sullivan (3) (4)
  Erin L. McKean (3) (4)
  Lawerence J. Marentette (3) (4)
  
  1. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  2. Division of NeuroInterventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, UH B1D 328, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
  3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  4. Cranial Base Surgery Program, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  
• ISSN：1432-1920

文摘

Introduction Preoperative embolization of a carotid body tumor (CBT) is a useful adjunct prior to surgical excision because it decreases operative blood loss and improves surgical outcomes. Traditionally, this is performed by transarterial particulate embolization (TAPE). More recently, direct percutaneous embolization (DPE) with Onyx is recognized as a promising technique for preoperative embolization. We compared these two techniques in patients treated for CBTs at our institution. Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases of preoperative devascularization of CBT from 1 January 1995 through 1 September 2012. Patient cases were placed into two groups: TAPE and DPE. Operative blood loss, operative length, angiographic devascularization, embolization procedure complications, operative transfusion requirements, postoperative hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and procedure-related mortalities were compared. Results A total of 17 patients underwent preoperative devascularization of their CBT with TAPE technique and ten patients using the DPE technique with Onyx. Average operative blood loss was significantly higher in the TAPE group (Mann–Whitney U test, p--.04). Operative time was also higher, although this difference was not significant. Two patients required intraoperative blood transfusions in the TAPE group while none required transfusions in the DPE group. There was no significant difference in ICU stay or length of hospitalization. One serious embolization procedure complication occurred in the TAPE group and none in the DPE group. Conclusion Operative blood loss in the DPE group was significantly less than the TAPE group. Blood transfusion requirement, operative time, and complications were less in the DPE group, although they did not reach statistical significance.