Using value of statistical life for the ex ante evaluation of transport policy options: a discussion based on ethical theory

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bert van Wee (1)
  Piet Rietveld (2)
  
• 关键词：Value of a statistical life (VOSL) ; Ethics ; Cost鈥揵enefit analysis (CBA)
• 刊名：Transportation
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：February 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：40
• 期：2
• 页码：295-314
• 全文大小：233KB
• 参考文献：1. Allsop, R.E.: A long way: but not all the way: response to the 7th European Transport Safety Lecture. In: Europe and Its Road Safety Vision鈥擧ow far to zero? 7th European Transport Safety Lecture, 14鈥?6. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council (2005)
  2. Anand, P., Wailoo, A.: Utilities versus rights to publicly provided goods: arguments and evidence from health care rationing. Economica 6(2000), 543鈥?77 (2000) CrossRef
  3. Audi, R.: Moral Value and Human Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York (2007) CrossRef
  4. Broome, J.: Should we value population? J. Polit. Philos. 13(4), 399鈥?13 (2005) CrossRef
  5. Button, K.J.: Transport Economics, 3rd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2010)
  6. Cameron, T.A.: Euthanizing the value of a statistical life. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4(2), 161鈥?78 (2010) CrossRef
  7. Church, A., Frost, M., Sullivan, K.: Transport and social exclusion in London. Transp. Policy 7, 195鈥?05 (2000) CrossRef
  8. Coase, R.H.: The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3(1), 1鈥?4 (1960) CrossRef
  9. Cookson, R., Dolan, P.: Principles of justice in health care rationing. J. Med. Ethics 26, 323鈥?29 (2000) CrossRef
  10. Darwall, S.L.: Theories of ethics. In: Frey, R.G., Heath Wellman, G. (eds.) A Companion to Applied Ethics, pp. 17鈥?7. Blackwell, Malden MA, Oxford, Carlton, Victoria (2003)
  11. Davidson, M.D.: Acceptable risk to future generations. In: Asveld, L., Roeser, S. (eds.) The Ethics of Technological Risk, pp. 77鈥?1. Earthscan, London/Sterling, VA (2009)
  12. De Blaeij, A.T.: The Value of a Statistical Life in Road Safety; Stated Preference Methodologies and Empirical Estimates for the Netherlands. Tinbergen Institute Research Series, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2003)
  13. De Blaeij, A.T., Florax, R.J.G.M., Rietveld, P., Verhoef, E.: The value of statistical life in road safety. A meta-analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35(6), 973鈥?86 (2003) CrossRef
  14. Dionne, G., Lanoie, P.: Public choice and the value of a statistical life for cost-benefit analysis: the case of road safety. J. Transp. Econom. Policy 38(2), 247鈥?74 (2004)
  15. Elvebakk, B., Steiro, T.: First principles, second hand: perceptions and interpretations of vision zero in Norway. Saf. Sci. 47, 958鈥?66 (2009) CrossRef
  16. Elvik, R.: Can injury prevention efforts go too far? Reflections on some possible implications of Vision Zero for road accident fatalities. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31(3), 265鈥?86 (1999) CrossRef
  17. Elvik, R.: Cost鈥揵enefit analysis of ambulance and rescue helicopters in Norway: reflections on assigning a monetary value to saving a human life. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 1(2), 55鈥?3 (2002)
  18. Evans, A.W.: Economic appraisal of road safety measures in Great Britain. Int. J. Sust. Transport. 3(3), 160鈥?77 (2009) CrossRef
  19. Fahlquist, J.N.: Responsibility ascriptions and Vision Zero. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(2006), 1113鈥?118 (2006) CrossRef
  20. Hahnel, R., Sheeran, K.A.: Misinterpreting the Coase theorem. J. Econ. Issues 43(1), 215鈥?38 (2009) CrossRef
  21. Hammitt, J.K.: QALYs versus WTP. Risk Anal. 22, 985鈥?001 (2002) CrossRef
  22. Hammitt, J.K.: Valuing changes in mortality risk: lives saved versus life years saved. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 1(2), 228鈥?40 (2007) CrossRef
  23. Hanemann, M.: Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? Am. Econ. Rev. 81(3), 635鈥?47 (1991)
  24. Hayashi, Y., Morisugi, H.: International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal. Transp. Policy 7, 73鈥?8 (2000) CrossRef
  25. Hicks, J.: The foundations of welfare economics. Econ. J. 49, 696鈥?12 (1939) CrossRef
  26. Hills, P.J., Jones-Lee, M.W.: The role of safety in highway investment appraisal for developing countries. Accid. Anal. Prev. 15(5), 355鈥?69 (1983) CrossRef
  27. Johanneson, M., Pliskin, J.S., Weinstein, M.C.: A note on QALYs, time tradeoff, and discounting. Med. Decis. Making 14, 188鈥?93 (1994) CrossRef
  28. Johansson-Stenman, O., Martinsson, P.: Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach. J. Health Econ. 27(3), 739鈥?52 (2008) CrossRef
  29. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L.: Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J. Environ. Econ. Mange. 22, 57鈥?0 (1992) CrossRef
  30. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
  31. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A.: Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)
  32. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D.: Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J. Risk Uncertainty 19, 203鈥?35 (1999) CrossRef
  33. Kaldor, N.: Welfare propositions in economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Econ. J. 49, 549鈥?52 (1939) CrossRef
  34. Keeler, E.B., Cretin, S.: Discounting of life-saving and other nonmonetary effects. Manage. Sci. 29, 300鈥?06 (1983) CrossRef
  35. Kelman, S.: Cost鈥揵enefit analysis: an ethical critique. Regulation 5(1), 33鈥?0 (1981)
  36. Leung, J., Guria, J.: Value of statistical life: adults versus children. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38, 1208鈥?217 (2006) CrossRef
  37. Loomes, G., McKenzie, L.: The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc. Sci. Med. 28(4), 299鈥?08 (1989) CrossRef
  38. Lorenzo, O., Esqueda, P., Larson, J.: Safety and ethics in the global workplace: asymmetries in culture and infrastructure. J. Bus. Ethics 92, 87鈥?06 (2010) CrossRef
  39. Mackie, P.J., Wardman, M., Fowkes, A.S., Whelan, G.A., Nellthorp, J., Bates, J.: Value of travel time savings in the UK. Prepared for the Department for Transport. Leeds: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds/John Bastes Services (2003)
  40. Mandeloff, M., Kaplan, R.: Are large differences in lifesaving costs justified? A psychometric study of the relative value placed on preventing deaths. Risk Anal. 9, 349鈥?63 (1989) CrossRef
  41. Martens, K.: Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Plan. J. 19, 2006, (www-dcrp.ced.berkeley.edu/bpj) (2006)
  42. Meyer, L.H., Roser, D.: Enough for the future. In: Gosseries, A., Meyer, L.H. (eds.) Intergenerational Justice, pp. 219鈥?48. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009) CrossRef
  43. Morisugi, H., Hayashi, Y. (Editorial).: Transp. Policy 7(1), 1鈥? (2000)
  44. Morton, A.: Disaster and Dilemmas. Strategies for Real-Life Decision Making. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1991)
  45. Ng, Y.-K.: The older the more valuable: divergence between utility and dollar values of life as one ages. J. Econ. 55, 1鈥?6 (1992) CrossRef
  46. Nilsen, P., Hudson, D.S., Kullberg, A., Timpka, T., Ekman, R., Lindqvist, K.: Making sense of safety. Inj. Prev. 10, 71鈥?3 (2004) CrossRef
  47. Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., Common, M.: Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Pearson Education, Ashford Colour Press, Gosport (2003)
  48. Preston, J., Raje, F.: Accessibility, mobility and transport related social exclusion. J. Transp. Geogr. 15, 151鈥?60 (2007) CrossRef
  49. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA (1971)
  50. Rawls, H.: Social unity and primary goods. In: Sen, A., Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, pp. 159鈥?85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1982) CrossRef
  51. Saelensminde, K.: Cost鈥揵enefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic. Transport. Res. A-Pol. Practice 38(8), 593鈥?06 (2004) CrossRef
  52. Schipper, Y.: Environmental costs of European aviation. Transp. Policy 11(2), 141鈥?54 (2004) CrossRef
  53. Sen, A.: The Idea of Justice. Allen Lane, London (2009)
  54. Shepard, D.S., Zeckhauser, R.J.: Survival versus consumption. Manage. Sci. 30, 423鈥?39 (1984) CrossRef
  55. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S.: Regulation of risk: a psychological perspective. In: Noll, R. (ed.) Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy Berkeley, pp. 241鈥?78. University of California Press, London (1985)
  56. Subramanian, U., Cropper, M.: Public choices between life saving programs: the tradeoff between qualitative factors and lives saved. J. Risk Uncertainty 21, 117鈥?49 (2000) CrossRef
  57. Tingvall, C., Haworth, N.: Vision zero鈥攁n ethical approach to safety and mobility. Paper presented to the 6th ITE Conference on Road Safety and Traffic Enforcement: Beyond 2000. Melbourne, 6鈥? September 1999
  58. Van Wee, B.: Transport and Ethics. Ethics and the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Projects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2011)
  59. Vlakveld, W.P., Goldenbeld, Ch., Twisk, D.A.M.: Beleving van verkeersonveiligheid; Een probleemverkenning over subjectieve veiligheid. Report R-2008-15. Leidschendam: Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid SWOV (2008)
  60. Wolf, C.: Climate change and climate policies. In: Gosseries, A., Meyer, L.H. (eds.) Intergenerational Justice, pp. 347鈥?76. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009) CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Bert van Wee (1)
  Piet Rietveld (2)
  
  1. Transport Policy and Logistics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  2. Department of Spatial Economics, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  
• ISSN：1572-9435

文摘

This paper aims to discuss a number of questions that are highly important for the ex ante evaluation of the safety impacts of transport policy options, from the perspective of ethical theory: (1) Is it morally OK to express prevention on acceptance of fatalities or risks in monetary terms? (2) How useful is the concept of the value of a statistical life (VOSL) for ex ante evaluations of transport policy options? (3) What are the pros and cons of pricing protection of lives or prevention of risks in ex ante evaluations? (4) Which methods are available for expressing (protection of) human lives in monetary terms, and what are the main related methodological discussions? (5) Are all safety-related costs generally included in ex ante evaluations of the safety impacts of transport policy options, and if not: what is the relevance of excluded costs categories from an ethical perspective? (6) How important is the distribution of safety effects from an ethical perspective? The answer to the first question highly depends on the ethical theory that is used. With respect to question 2 we think that the VOSL is a useful concept, but that its application is not straightforward, for several reasons. Thirdly we think that probably pricing safety improves the quality of decision making, but to the best of our knowledge there is no research to underpin this expectation. The answer to question 4 is that several methods exist to estimate the value of a statistical life (VOSL), willingness-to-pay (WTP) methods being the most common category of methods. However, several methodological issues arise that make estimates of VOSL less straightforward. With respect to question 5 we conclude that behaviour-related avoidance costs are often overlooked and that these costs are relevant from an ethical perspective because the freedom to move and the freedom to participate in activities are challenged. Finally the answer to question 6 is that from an ethical perspective, in terms of the evaluation of policy measures, it might matter which groups of the population are the victims of the transport system, or are at risk. Egalitarian theories as well as sufficientarianism are useful theories to discuss distribution effects. Different theories conclude differently.