Onset rivalry: factors that succeed and fail to bias selection

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Mouna Attarha (1)
  Cathleen M. Moore (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychology ; University of Iowa ; E11 Seashore Hall ; Iowa City ; IA ; 52242-1407 ; USA
  
• 关键词：Onset binocular rivalry ; Rivalry entrainment ; Initial dominance ; Motion ; Prediction
• 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：February 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：77
• 期：2
• 页码：520-535
• 全文大小：997 KB
• 参考文献：1. Abe, S., Kimura, E., & Goryo, K. (2011). Eye- and feature-based modulation of onset rivalry caused by the preceding stimulus. / Journal of Vision, 11(13), 1鈥?8. doi:10.1167/11.13.6 CrossRef
  2. Alink, A., Schwiedrzik, C. M., Kohler, A., Singer, W., & Muckli, L. (2010). Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. / Journal of Neuroscience, 30(8), 2960鈥?966. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 3730-10.2010 CrossRef
  3. Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). The visual impact of gossip. / Science (New York, N.Y.), 332(6036), 1446鈥?448. doi:10.1126/science.1201574 CrossRef
  4. Blake, R., Brascamp, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2014). Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness? / Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), 20130211鈥?0130211. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 CrossRef
  5. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. / Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(1), 13鈥?1. doi:10.1038/nrn701 CrossRef
  6. Blake, R., Yang, Y., & Westendorf, D. (1991). Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. / Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 32(10), 2821鈥?825.
  7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. / Spatial Vision, 10, 433鈥?36. CrossRef
  8. Breese, B. B. (1909). Binocular rivalry. / Psychological Review, 16(6), 410. CrossRef
  9. Carter, O., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. / PLoS ONE, 2(4), e343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000343 CrossRef
  10. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. / Vision Research, 46(11), 1794鈥?803. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.031 CrossRef
  11. Chopin, A., & Mamassian, P. (2010). Task usefulness affects perception of Rivalrous images. / Psychological Science, 21(12), 1886鈥?893. doi:10.1177/0956797610389190 CrossRef
  12. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. / Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 119鈥?26. doi:10.1038/nn0203-119 CrossRef
  13. Crovitz, H. F., & Lipscomb, D. B. (1963). Dominance of the temporal visual fields at a short duration of stimulation. / American Journal of Psychology, 76, 631鈥?37. CrossRef
  14. de Jong, M. C., Kourtzi, Z., & van Ee, R. (2012a). Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness. / European Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 3718鈥?731. doi:10.1111/ejn.12005 CrossRef
  15. de Jong, M. C., Knapen, T., & van Ee, R. (2012b). Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity. / PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30595. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030595.g006 CrossRef
  16. Denison, R. N., Piazza, E. A., & Silver, M. A. (2011). Predictive context influences perceptual selection during binocular rivalry. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 166. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00166 CrossRef
  17. Denison, R. N., & Silver, M. A. (2012). Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 246鈥?59. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00121 CrossRef
  18. den Ouden, H. E. M., Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. / Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1鈥?2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548
  19. Dolan, R. J., Fink, G. R., Rolls, E., Booth, M., Holmes, A., Frackowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. J. (1997). How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. / Nature, 389(6651), 596鈥?99. doi:10.1038/39309 CrossRef
  20. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. / Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52鈥?4. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 CrossRef
  21. Ernst, M. O., & B眉lthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162鈥?69. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002 CrossRef
  22. Esterman, M., & Yantis, S. (2010). Perceptual expectation evokes category-selective cortical activity. / Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), / 20(5), 1245鈥?253. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp188
  23. Fahle, M. (1982). Cooperation between different spatial frequencies in binocular rivalry. / Biological Cybernetics, 44, 27鈥?9. CrossRef
  24. Fox, R., & Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. / Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 432鈥?36. CrossRef
  25. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. / Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815鈥?36. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 CrossRef
  26. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. / Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 453鈥?63. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029 CrossRef
  27. Georgeson, M. A., & Meese, T. S. (1997). Perception of stationary plaids: The role of spatial filters in edge analysis. / Vision Research, 37(23), 3255鈥?271. CrossRef
  28. Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W. J., & Garner, M. (2009). The influence of anxiety on the initial selection of emotional faces presented in binocular rivalry. / Cognition, 113, 105鈥?10. CrossRef
  29. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. / Nature, 438(7067), 496鈥?99. doi:10.1038/nature04169 CrossRef
  30. Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. / Cognition, 108(3), 687鈥?01. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010 CrossRef
  31. Joassin, F., Maurage, P., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2004). When audition alters vision: An event-related potential study of the cross-modal interactions between faces and voices. / Neuroscience Letters, 369(2), 132鈥?37. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.067 CrossRef
  32. Kalisvaart, J. P., Rampersad, S. M., & Goossens, J. (2011). Binocular onset rivalry at the time of saccades and stimulus jumps. / PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020017.t002 CrossRef
  33. Kaplan, I. T., & Metlay, W. (1964). Light intensity and binocular rivalry. / Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 22鈥?6. CrossRef
  34. Kim, Y.-J., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. / Vision Research, 46(3), 392鈥?06. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.009 CrossRef
  35. Kov谩cs, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Feh茅r, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(26), 15508鈥?5511. CrossRef
  36. Leat, S. J., & Woodhouse, J. M. (1984). Rivalry with continuous and flashed stimuli as a measure of ocular dominance across the visual field. / Perception, 13, 351鈥?57. CrossRef
  37. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. / Vision Research, 39(8), 1447鈥?454. CrossRef
  38. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. / Nature Neuroscience, 8(1), 22鈥?3. doi:10.1038/nn1365 CrossRef
  39. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys鈥?percepts during binocular rivalry. / Nature, 379(6565), 549鈥?53. doi:10.1038/379549a0 CrossRef
  40. Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. / Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20(7), 1434鈥?448. CrossRef
  41. Levelt, W. (1965). / On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
  42. Levelt, W. J. (1967). Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. / British Journal of Psychology, 58, 143鈥?45. CrossRef
  43. Lin, Z., & He, S. (2009). Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. / Progress in Neurobiology, 87(4), 195鈥?11. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.002 CrossRef
  44. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. / Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1801鈥?818. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333 CrossRef
  45. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. / Science (New York, N.Y.), 245(4919), 761鈥?63. CrossRef
  46. LoSciuto, L. A., & Hartley, E. L. (1963). Religious affiliation and open-mindedness in binocular resolution. / Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 427鈥?30.
  47. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. / Science, 280, 1930鈥?934. CrossRef
  48. Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., & Tsuchiya, N. (2012). Introduction to research topic - binocular rivalry: A gateway to studying consciousness. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1鈥?. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263/full CrossRef
  49. Melloni, L., Schwiedrzik, C. M., M眉ller, N., Rodriguez, E., & Singer, W. (2011). Expectations change the signatures and timing of electrophysiological correlates of perceptual awareness. / Journal of Neuroscience, 31(4), 1386鈥?396. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 4570-10.2011 CrossRef
  50. Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., & Reynolds, J. H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. / Nature, 429(6990), 410鈥?13. doi:10.1038/nature02554 CrossRef
  51. Mudrik, L., Deouell, L. Y., & Lamy, D. (2011). Scene congruency biases Binocular Rivalry. / Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 756鈥?67. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001 CrossRef
  52. Mueller, T. J., & Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. / Biological Cybernetics, 61(3), 223鈥?32. CrossRef
  53. N盲盲t盲nen, R. (1992). / Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  54. Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. / Perception, 28(5), 551鈥?74. doi:10.1068/p2923 CrossRef
  55. O'Shea, R. P., Kornmeier, J., & Roeber, U. (2013). Predicting visual consciousness electrophysiologically from intermittent binocular rivalry. / PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76134. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076134.s005 CrossRef
  56. O鈥橲hea, R. P., Parker, A., La Rooy, D., & Alais, D. (2009). Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes. / Vision Research, 49(7), 671鈥?81. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.020
  57. Paffen, C. L. E., & Alais, D. (2011). Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 105. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00105 CrossRef
  58. Pastukhov, A., & Braun, J. (2011). Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. / Journal of Vision, 11(10), 1鈥?0. doi:10.1167/11.10.12 CrossRef
  59. Pearson, J., & Brascamp, J. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 334鈥?41. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.006 CrossRef
  60. Pelekanos, V., Roumani, D., & Moutoussis, K. (2011). The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 187. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00187
  61. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. / Spatial Vision, 10, 437鈥?42. CrossRef
  62. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. / Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153鈥?159. CrossRef
  63. Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. / Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79鈥?7. doi:10.1038/4580 CrossRef
  64. Roumani, D., & Moutoussis, K. (2012). Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 35. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00035 CrossRef
  65. Sheth, B. R., & Pham, T. (2008). Vision research. / Vision Research, 48(23鈥?4), 2415鈥?424. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.013 CrossRef
  66. 艩id谩k, Z. K. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. / Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626鈥?33. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935
  67. Sillito, A. M., Jones, H. E., Gerstein, G. L., & West, D. C. (1994). Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex. / Nature, 369(6480), 479鈥?82. doi:10.1038/369479a0 CrossRef
  68. Song, C., & Yao, H. (2009). Duality in binocular rivalry: Distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli. / PLoS ONE, 4(9), e6912. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006912 CrossRef
  69. Stanley, J., Forte, J. D., Cavanagh, P., & Carter, O. (2011). Onset rivalry: The initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1鈥?. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00140/abstract CrossRef
  70. Stefanics, G., & Czigler, I. (2012). Automatic prediction error responses to hands with unexpected laterality: An electrophysiological study. / NeuroImage, 63(1), 253鈥?61. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.068 CrossRef
  71. Stefanics, G., Kremlacek, J., & Czigler, I. (2014). Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, B, 1-19. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666/abstract
  72. Summerfield, C., & Koechlin, E. (2008). A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. / Neuron, 59(2), 336鈥?47. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.021 CrossRef
  73. Thesen, T., Vibell, J. F., Calvert, G. A., & Sterbauer, R. A. (2004). Neuroimaging of multisensory processing in vision, audition, touch, and olfaction. / Cognitive Processing, 5(2), 84鈥?3. doi:10.1007/s10339-004-0012-4 CrossRef
  74. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. / Nature, 411(6834), 195鈥?99. doi:10.1038/35075583 CrossRef
  75. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 502鈥?11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003 CrossRef
  76. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. / Neuron, 21, 753鈥?59. CrossRef
  77. Tononi, G., Srinivvasan, R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(3198), 3203.
  78. van Ee, R. (2009). Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: Evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. / Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 26, 2612鈥?622. CrossRef
  79. Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herv茅, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houd茅, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. / NeuroImage, 30(4), 1414鈥?432. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002
  80. Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. / Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 3665鈥?678. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 5003-11.2012 CrossRef
  81. Walker, P. (1978). Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes? / Psychological Bulletin, 85, 376鈥?89. CrossRef
  82. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision鈥攑art the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. / Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 128, 371鈥?94. CrossRef
  83. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. / Nature, 412(6850), 907鈥?10. doi:10.1038/35091066 CrossRef
  84. Wolf, M., & Hochstein, S. (2011). High-level binocular rivalry effects. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1鈥?. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00129/abstract CrossRef
  85. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. / Perception, 12(4), 447鈥?56. CrossRef
  86. Yu, K., & Blake, R. (1992). Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1158鈥?173.
  
• 刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1943-393X

文摘

This project examined whether previous visual history can bias perceptual dominance during onset rivalry. A predictive sequence of non-rivalrous stimuli preceded dichoptically presented rivalrous displays. One of the dichoptic images was the implied next step of the preceding sequence while the other was not. Observers reported their initial dominant percept. Across five experiments, we found that motion sequences biased perceptual selection such that a rivalrous stimulus that continued a motion sequence tended to dominate one that did not. However, signals generated by complex pattern of motion information or verbal-semantic information had no influence on selection. These results are consistent with the view that onset rivalry is an early phase of rivalry that is likely insensitive to modulation by factors originating beyond the visual system.