Geophysical signatures resolving hydrogeological complexities over hard rock terrain—a study from Southern India
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Sahebrao Sonkamble (1)
    Subash Chandra (1)
    E. Nagaiah (1)
    Farooq A. Dar (1)
    V. K. Somvanshi (1)
    Shakeel Ahmed (1)
  • 关键词:Hydrogeological complexities ; Geophysical parameters ; Groundwater potential ; Borehole drilling ; Hyderabad ; India
  • 刊名:Arabian Journal of Geosciences
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:June 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:7
  • 期:6
  • 页码:2249-2256
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:1. Ahmed S, Sankaran S, Gupta CP (1995) Variographic analysis of some hydrogeological parameters: use of geological soft data. J Environ Hydrol 3(2):28-5
    2. Bhattacharya PK, Patra HP (1968) Direct current electrical sounding. Elseveir, Amsterdam
    3. Chandra S (2006) Contribution of geophysical properties in estimating hydrogeological parameters of an aquifer. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. BHU, Varanasi, India, pp. 176
    4. Chandra S, Rao VA, Singh VS (2004) A combined approach of Schlumberger and axial pole-dipole configurations for groundwater exploration in hard rock areas. Curr Sci 86(10):1437-442
    5. Chandra S, Rao VA, Krishnamurthy NS, Dutta S, Shakeel A (2006) Integrated studies for characterization of lineaments to locate groundwater potential zones in hard rock region of Karnataka, India. Hydrogeol J 14:767-76 CrossRef
    6. Chandra S, Ahmed S, Ram A, Dewandel B (2008) Estimation of hard rock aquifers hydraulic conductivity from geoelectrical measurements: a theoretical development with field application. J Hydrol 357:218-27 CrossRef
    7. Chandra S, Dewandel B, Dutta S, Ahmed S (2010) Geophysical model of geological discontinuities in a granitic aquifer: analyzing small scale variability of electrical resistivity for groundwater occurrences. J Appl Geophys 71:137-48 CrossRef
    8. Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Zaidi F, Chandra S (2011) A Conceptual hydrodynamic model of a geological discontinuity in hard rock aquifers: example of a quartz reef in granitic terrain in South India. J Hydrol 405:475-87
    9. Dey A, Morrison HF (1979) Resistivity modelling for arbitrary shaped two dimensional structures. Geophys Prospect 27:106-36 CrossRef
    10. Jardani A, Revil A (2009) Stochastic joint inversion of temperature and self-potential data. Geophys J Int 179(1):640-54. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04295.x CrossRef
    11. Kelly WE, Mares S (1993) Applied geophysics in hydrogeological and engineering practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 290
    12. Kilty KT (1984) On the origin and interpretation of self-potential anomalies. Geophys Prospect 32:51-2 CrossRef
    13. Loke MH (2001) Tutorial : 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. pp. 118
    14. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131-52 CrossRef
    15. Parasinis DS (1973) Principles of applied geophysics, 5th edn. Chapman and Hall, London
    16. Parkhomenko EI (1967) In: George GV (ed) Electrical properties of rocks. Translated from Russian. Plenum Press, New York CrossRef
    17. Reddy VR (2012) Hydrological externalities and livelihoods impacts: Informed communities for better resource management. J Hydrol 412-13:279-90 CrossRef
    18. Sandberg SK, Slater LD, Versteeg R (2002) An integrated geophysical investigation of the hydrogeology of an anisotropic unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 267:227-43 CrossRef
    19. Sankaran S, Rangarajan R, Krishnakumar K, Saheb Rao S, Smitha V (2010) Geophysical and tracer studies to detect subsurface chromium contamination and suitable site for waste disposal in Ranipet, Vellore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Earth Sci 60:757-64. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0213-3 CrossRef
    20. Sankaran S, Sonkamble S, Krishnakumar K, Mondal NC (2012) Integrated approach for demarcating subsurface pollution and saline water intrusion zones in SIPCOT area: a case study from Cuddalore in Southern India. Environ Monit Assess 184:5121-138. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2327-9 CrossRef
    21. Sato M, Mooney HM (1960) The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide self-potentials. Geophysics 25:226-49 CrossRef
    22. Sharma PV (1997) Environmental and engineering geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 475 CrossRef
    23. Sharma VVJ, Rao B (1962) Variation of electrical resistivity of river sands, Calcite and Quartz powders with water content. Geophysics 17, No.4
    24. Sill WR (1983) Self-potential modeling from primary flows. Geophysics 48:76-6 CrossRef
    25. Sonkamble S (2012) Integrated approach for demarcating subsurface pollution and saline water intrusion zones in SIPCOT area, Cuddalore, Southern India. Ph. D Thesis, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India pp. 42-3
    26. Sonkamble S, Sahya A, Mondal NC, Harikumar P (2012) Appraisal and evolution of hydrochemical processes from proximity basalt and granite areas of Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP) in India. J Hydrol 438-39:181-93. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.022
    27. Sonkamble S, Sethurama S, Krishnakumar K, Dhunde P, Amarender B, Satish Kumar V (2013) Role of geophysical and hydrogeological techniques in EIA studies to identify TSDF site for industrial waste management. J of Geol Soc India Vol 81
    28. Sprunt ES, Mercer TB, Djabbarah NF (1994) Streaming potential from multiphase flow. Geophysics 59:707-11 CrossRef
    29. Straface S, Rizzo E, Chidichimo F (2010) Estimation of water table map and hydraulic conductivity in a large scale model by means of the SP method. J Geophys Res 115:B06105. doi:10.1029/2009JB007053
    30. Straface S, Chidichimo F, Rizzo E, Riva M, Barrash W, Revil A, Cardiff M, Guadagnini A (2011) Joint inversion of steady-state hydrologic and self-potential data for 3D hydraulic conductivity distribution at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site. J Hydrol 407:115-28 CrossRef
    31. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics II Ed. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 790 CrossRef
    32. Yadav GS, Singh SK (2007) Integrated resistivity surveys for delineation of fractures for ground water exploration in hard rock areas. J Appl Geophys 62:301-12 CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Sahebrao Sonkamble (1)
    Subash Chandra (1)
    E. Nagaiah (1)
    Farooq A. Dar (1)
    V. K. Somvanshi (1)
    Shakeel Ahmed (1)

    1. Indo-French Centre for Groundwater Research, CSIR—National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, 500 007, India
  • ISSN:1866-7538
文摘
A series of geophysical parameters have been applied with geological perception to resolve the hydrogeological complexities over granitic terrain at Hyderabad, India. Frequent failure of borehole drillings and the thrust conditions of community have prompted a noninvasive suitable tool, applied at small scale for pinpointing potential well site. Geophysical scanning, viz. electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), spontaneous potential (SP), and electrical gradient profiling (GP) were employed within the restricted space of housing complex to obtain the true characteristics of the subsurface lithology, where anomalies by the underground utility structures have been nullified. Results showed, in ERT, the low order of resistivity range 123 to 200?Ωm showing a plume like weathered zone underlain by sudden slip of massive granite (>217?Ωm) was of great interest to proceed further in the process. Here, the switchover in SP value from +18?mV to ?7?mV and GP from mean value 10 to 90?mV/m was recorded. The anomalies in SP and GP were precisely coincided with the ERT where upcoming of subsurface massive granite next to the inferred fracture was noted. Drilling core logs satisfies the geophysical signatures ensuring the inferred saturated fracture with the total yield 1,302?gal/h.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700