Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Djoko Sigit Sayogo (1) (2)
  Jing Zhang (3)
  Luis Luna-Reyes (4)
  Holly Jarman (5)
  Giri Tayi (6)
  Deborah Lines Andersen (6)
  Theresa A. Pardo (2)
  David F. Andersen (6)
  
  1. The University of Muhammadiyah at Malang ; Malang ; Indonesia
  2. Center for Technology in Government ; University at Albany ; Albany ; NY ; USA
  3. Clark University ; Worcester ; MA ; USA
  4. Universidad de las Americas Puebla ; Cholula ; Mexico
  5. University of Michigan ; Ann Arbor ; MI ; USA
  6. University at Albany ; Albany ; NY ; USA
  
• 关键词：Sustainable consumption ; Sustainable supply chains ; Information integration ; Interoperable data architecture ; Industrial ecology ; I ; Choose
• 刊名：Information Technology and Management
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：16
• 期：1
• 页码：5-18
• 全文大小：448 KB
• 参考文献：1. Linton, JD, Klassen, R, Jayaraman, V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manag 25: pp. 1075-1082 CrossRef
  2. Fuchs, DA, Lorek, S (2005) Sustainable consumption governance: a history of promises and failures. J Consum Policy 28: pp. 261-288 CrossRef
  3. Mont, O, Plepys, A (2008) Sustainable consumption progress: Should we be proud or alarmed?. J Clean Prod 16: pp. 531-537 CrossRef
  4. Seyfang, G (2005) Shopping for sustainability: Can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship?. Environ Polit 14: pp. 290-306 CrossRef
  5. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14:57鈥?4
  6. Fama, EF, Jensen, MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26: pp. 301-325 CrossRef
  7. Akerlof GA (1970) The market for 鈥渓emons鈥? quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488鈥?00
  8. Mishra DP, Heide JB, Cort SG (1998) Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. J Mark Res 35:277鈥?95
  9. Jahn, G, Schramm, M, Spiller, A (2005) The reliability of certification: quality labels as a consumer policy tool. J Consum Policy 28: pp. 53-73 CrossRef
  10. Luna-Reyes, L, Zhang, J, Whitmore, A (2014) Full information product pricing: an information strategy for harnessing consumer choice to create a more sustainable world. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 34: pp. 1
  11. Graham, M, Haarstad, H (2011) Transparency and development: ethical consumption through Web 2.0 and the internet of things. Inf Technol Int Dev 7: pp. 1-18
  12. Watts, S, Wyner, G (2011) Designing and theorizing the adoption of mobile technology-mediated ethical consumption tools. Inf Technol People 24: pp. 257-280 CrossRef
  13. Jarman H, Luna-Reyes LF, Zhang J, Whitmore A, Picazo-Vela S, Andersen DL, Tayi GK, Pardo TA, Andersen DF, Sayogo DS (2011) I-Choose: consumer choice, digital government, and sustainability in North America. Presented at the APPAM Research Conference, Washington, DC
  14. Vachon, S, Klassen, R (2007) Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration. Int J Prod Res 45: pp. 401-423 CrossRef
  15. Darby, MR, Karni, E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J Law Econ 16: pp. 67-88 CrossRef
  16. Nelson, P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J Polit Econ 78: pp. 311-329 CrossRef
  17. Angell, LC, Klassen, RD (1999) Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. J Oper Manag 17: pp. 575-598 CrossRef
  18. Matos, S, Hall, J (2007) Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: the case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. J Oper Manag 25: pp. 1083-1102 CrossRef
  19. Sarkis, J, Zhu, Q, Lai, K (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130: pp. 1-15 CrossRef
  20. Zhu, Q, Sarkis, J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag 22: pp. 265-289 CrossRef
  21. Hsu, C-C, Tan, KC, Zailani, SHM, Jayaraman, V (2013) Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 33: pp. 656-688 CrossRef
  22. Wolf J (2011) Sustainable supply chain management integration: a qualitative analysis of the German manufacturing industry. J Bus Ethics 102:1鈥?5
  23. Collins, CM, Steg, L, Koning, MAS (2007) Customers鈥檝alues, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychol Mark 24: pp. 555-577 CrossRef
  24. Locke, R, Romis, M (2007) Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48: pp. 54-61
  25. Locke, R, Kochan, T, Romis, M, Qin, F (2007) Beyond corporate codes of conduct: work organization and labour standards at Nike鈥檚 suppliers. Int Labour Rev 146: pp. 21-40 CrossRef
  26. Opara, LU (2003) Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: a review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects. J Food Agric Environ 1: pp. 101-106
  27. Wilson, TP, Clarke, WR (1998) Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Manag Int J 3: pp. 127-133 CrossRef
  28. Bardhan, IR, Demirkan, H, Kannan, PK, Kauffman, RJ, Sougstad, R (2010) An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. J Manag Inf Syst 26: pp. 13-64 CrossRef
  29. Lyons, AC, Coronado Mondragon, AE, Bremang, A, Kehoe, DF, Coleman, J (2005) Prototyping an information system鈥檚 requirements architecture for customer-driven, supply-chain operations. Int J Prod Res 43: pp. 4289-4319 CrossRef
  30. Xu, LD (2011) Information architecture for supply chain quality management. Int J Prod Res 49: pp. 183-198 CrossRef
  31. Klein, R, Rai, A (2009) Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Q 33: pp. 735-762
  32. Steinfield, C, Markus, ML, Wigand, RT (2011) Through a glass clearly: standards, architecture, and process transparency in global supply chains. J Manag Inf Syst 28: pp. 75-108 CrossRef
  33. Malhotra A, Gosain S, Sawy OAE (2005) Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. Mis Q 29:145鈥?87
  34. Bayat, A, Sundararajan, S, Gustafson, HR, Zimmers, EW (2011) Sustainably driven supply chains. Ind Eng 43: pp. 26-31
  35. Davis, C, Nikolic, I, Dijkema, GP (2010) Industrial Ecology 2.0. J Ind Ecol 14: pp. 707-726 CrossRef
  36. Mishra, BK, Raghunathan, S, Yue, X (2007) Information sharing in supply chains: incentives for information distortion. IIE Trans 39: pp. 863-877 CrossRef
  37. Clemons, EK, Row, MC (1993) Limits to interfirm coordination through information technology: results of a field study in consumer packaged goods distribution. J Manag Inf Syst 10: pp. 73-95 CrossRef
  38. Johnston, HR, Vitale, MR (1988) Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Q 12: pp. 153-165 CrossRef
  39. Han, K, Chang, YB, Hahn, J (2011) Information technology spillover and productivity: the role of information technology intensity and competition. J Manag Inf Syst 28: pp. 115-146 CrossRef
  40. Mont, O, Bleischwitz, R (2007) Sustainable consumption and resource management in the light of life cycle thinking. Eur Environ 17: pp. 59-76 CrossRef
  41. Lebel, L, Lorek, S (2008) Enabling sustainable production-consumption systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33: pp. 241-275 CrossRef
  42. Srivastava, SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9: pp. 53-80 CrossRef
  43. Pardo TA, Burke GB (2008) Improving government interoperability: a capability framework for government managers. Center for Technology in Government
  44. Pardo, TA, Gil-Garcia, JR, Burke, GB Sustainable cross-boundary information sharing. In: Chen, H, Brandt, L, Gregg, V, Traunmuller, R, Dawes, SS, Hovy, E, Macintosh, A, Larson, CA eds. (2008) Digital government: advanced research and case studies, and implementation. Springer, New York, pp. 421-438 CrossRef
  45. Eisenhardt, KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14: pp. 532-550
  46. Stake, RE (2006) Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press, New York
  47. Yin, RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks
  48. Raynolds, L, Murray, D, Heller, A (2007) Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: a comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agric Hum Values 24: pp. 147-163 CrossRef
  49. Gereffi, G, Humphrey, J, Sturgeon, T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev Int Polit Econ 12: pp. 78-104 CrossRef
  50. Sayogo DS (2013) Modeling incentives to disclose: smart disclosure policy, private sector transparency and demanded disclosure (Dissertation). University at Albany State University of New York, Albany, NY
  51. Sayogo DS, Jarman H, Whitmore A, Tayi GK, Zhang J, Hrdinova J, Pardo TA, Andersen DF, Luna-Reyes LF, Tan X, Andersen DL (2012) A stakeholder analysis of interoperable data architecture: the case of I-Choose. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual international conference on digital government research, Dg.o鈥?2. Presented at the dg.o, ACM, Albany, NY, USA, pp 145鈥?54
  52. Rindfleisch, TC (1997) Privacy, information technology, and health care. ACM Commun 40: pp. 92-100 CrossRef
  53. Stiglitz, JE (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Q J Econ 115: pp. 1441-1478 CrossRef
  54. Vurro, C, Russo, A, Perrini, F (2009) Shaping sustainable value chains: network determinants of supply chain governance models. J Bus Ethics 90: pp. 607-621 CrossRef
  55. Donahue, JD, Zeckhauser, RJ (2011) Collaborative governance: private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  56. Sabel, CF, Zeitlin, J (2008) Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur Law J 14: pp. 271-327 CrossRef
  Sabel, CF, Zeitlin, J eds. (2010) Experimentalist governance in the European Union: towards a new architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  57. Abbott K, Snidal D (2009) The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: Mattli W, Woods N (eds) The politics of global regulation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 44鈥?8
  58. H茅ritier, A, Lehmkuhl, D (2008) The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. J Public Policy 28: pp. 1-17
  59. Jiang, B (2009) Implementing supplier codes of conduct in global supply chains: process explanations from theoretic and empirical perspectives. J Bus Ethics 85: pp. 77-92 CrossRef
  60. Lim, SJ, Phillips, J (2008) Embedding CSR values: the global footwear industry鈥檚 evolving governance structure. J Bus Ethics 81: pp. 143-156 CrossRef
  61. Emerson, K, Nabatchi, T, Balogh, S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theor 22: pp. 1-29 CrossRef
  62. Horne, RE (2009) Limits to labels: the role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. Int J Consum Stud 33: pp. 175-182 CrossRef
  63. Davies, J, Fensel, D, Harmelen, F (2003) Towards the semantic web. Wiley, London
  64. Lumsden, J, Hall, H, Cruickshank, P (2011) Ontology definition and construction, and epistemological adequacy for systems interoperability: a practitioner analysis. J Inf Sci 37: pp. 246 CrossRef
  65. Luna-Reyes, LF, Andersen DF, Andersen DL, Derrick D, Jarman H (2012) Full information product pricing (FIPP) regimes: policy implications for US鈥揗exico sustainable commerce. 3rd annual Puentes consortium symposium on the Mexico-US Border, Rice University, Houston
  66. Ansell, C, Gash, A (2007) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18: pp. 543-571 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Business Information Systems; Data Structures, Cryptology and Information Theory; Operations Research/Decision Theory; Computer Communication Networks; Business/Management Science, general;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1573-7667

文摘

Information asymmetry between consumers and supply chain actors represents a major barrier to the expansion of sustainable consumption. Developing an interoperable data architecture that enables the integration of data regarding sustainability practices from disparate sources in sustainable supply chains is important for improving market transparency. This paper identifies main issues and requirements as perceived by the key stakeholders in the coffee supply chain for such development. The analysis reveals that building an interoperable data architecture necessitates awareness of several major challenges, including the difficulties of collecting accurate and creditable data, limited technological capabilities, complex data ownership and disclosure policy, issues of confidentiality, privacy and economic value of information, and cost of disclosing information. To deal with these challenges, we recommend that the development need to ensure data quality, integrity and security, design information policy balancing commercial interests and openness, and design appropriate governance mechanism to complement the technological design in order to ensure the fair and proper use of the system.