Characterization of cellulose degradation during accelerated ageing by SEC-MALS, SEC-DAD, and A4F-MALS methods

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：František Kačík ; Štěpán Podzimek ; Katarína Vizárová ; Danica Kačíková…
• 关键词：Cellulose ; Tricarbanilates (CTC) ; Degree of polymerization (DP) ; Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) ; Asymmetric flow field–flow fractionation (A4F) ; Paper degradation
• 刊名：Cellulose
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：23
• 期：1
• 页码：357-366
• 全文大小：517 KB
• 参考文献：Calvini P (2014) On the meaning of the Emsley, Ding & Wang and Calvini equations applied to the degradation of cellulose. Cellulose 21:1127–1134CrossRef
  Calvini P, Gorassini A, Merlani AL (2008) On the kinetics of cellulose degradation: looking beyond the pseudo zero order rate equation. Cellulose 15:193–203CrossRef
  Cao S, Pu Y, Studer M, Wyman C, Ragauskas AJ (2012) Chemical transformations of Populus trichocarpa during dilute acid pretreatment. RSC Adv 2:10925–10936CrossRef
  Danhelka J, Kossler I, Bohackova V (1976) Determination of molecular weight distribution of cellulose by conversion into tricarbanilate and fractionation. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 14:287–298CrossRef
  Dupont AL (2003) Cellulose in lithium chloride/N, N-dimethylacetamide, optimization of a dissolution method using paper substrates and stability of the solutions. Polymer 44:4117–4126CrossRef
  Dupont AL, Mortha G (2004) Comparative evaluation of size-exclusion chromatography and viscometry for the characterisation of cellulose. J Chromatogr A 1026:129–141CrossRef
  Emsley AM, Ali M, Heywood RJ (2000) A size exclusion chromatography study of cellulose degradation. Polymer 41:8513–8521CrossRef
  Evans R, Wearne RH, Wallis AFA (1989) Molecular weight distribution of cellulose as its tricarbanilate by high performance size exclusion chromatography. J Appl Polym Sci 37:3291–3303CrossRef
  Fengel D, Wegener G (2003) Wood chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Verlag Kessel, Remagen
  Henniges U, Vejdovszky P, Siller M, Jeong M-J, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2014) Finally dissolved! Activation procedures to dissolve cellulose in DMAc/LiCl prior to size exclusion chromatography analysis a review. Curr Chromatogr 1:52–68CrossRef
  Hofe T, Reinhold G, McConville J (2011) The challenge of using small particle packing materials in SEC/GPC risks and possibilities. Chromatogr Today 11(12):18–23
  Hubbell CA, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Effect of acid-chlorite delignification on cellulose degree of polymerization. Bioresour Technol 101:7410–7415CrossRef
  Jeong MJ, Kang KY, Bacher M, Kim HJ, Jo BM, Potthast A (2014) Deterioration of ancient cellulose paper, Hanji: evaluation of paper permanence. Cellulose 21:4621–4632CrossRef
  Josefsson T, Lennholm H, Gellerstedt G (2001) Changes in cellulose supramolecular structure and molecular weight distribution during steam explosion of aspen wood. Cellulose 8:289–296CrossRef
  Kačík F, Kačíková D, Jablonský M, Katuščák S (2009) Cellulose degradation in newsprint paper ageing. Polym Degrad Stab 94:1509–1514CrossRef
  Kes M, Christensen BE (2013) Degradation of cellulosic insulation in power transformers: a SEC–MALLS study of artificially aged transformer papers. Cellulose 20:2003–2011CrossRef
  Łojewski T, Zięba K, Łojewska J (2010) Size exclusion chromatography and viscometry in paper degradation studies. New Mark-Houwink coefficients for cellulose in cupri-ethylenediamine. J Chromatogr A 1217:6462–6468CrossRef
  Łojewski T, Zięba K, Kołodziej A, Łojewska J (2011) Following cellulose depolymerization in paper: comparison of size exclusion chromatography techniques. Cellulose 18:1349–1363CrossRef
  Oberlerchner JT, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2015) Overview of methods for the direct molar mass determination of cellulose. Molecules 20:10313–10341CrossRef
  Pala H, Mota M, Gama FM (2007) Enzymatic depolymerisation of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 68:101–108CrossRef
  Podzimek S (2011) Light scattering, size exclusion chromatography and asymmetric flow field flow fractionation. Wiley, Hoboken. doi:10.​1002/​9780470877975 CrossRef
  Podzimek S (2014) Principles of detection and characterization of branching in synthetic and natural polymers by MALS. Column J 10:16–19
  Podzimek S, Vlcek T, Johan C (2001) Characterization of branched polymers by size exclusion chromatography coupled with multiangle light scattering detector. I. Size exclusion chromatography elution behavior of branched polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 81:1588–1594CrossRef
  Potthast A, Rosenau T, Sixta H, Kosma P (2002) Degradation of cellulosic materials by heating in DMAc/LiCl. Tetrahedron Lett 43:7757–7759CrossRef
  Potthast A, Radosta S, Saake B, Lebioda S, Heinze T, Henniges U, Isogai A, Koschella A, Kosma P, Rosenau T, Schiehser S, Sixta H, Strlič M, Strobin G, Vorwerg W, Wetzel H (2015) Comparison testing of methods for gel permeation chromatography of cellulose: coming closer to a standard protocol. Cellulose 22:1591–1613CrossRef
  Sjöholm E (2004) Size exclusion chromatography of cellulose and cellulose derivatives. In: Wu CS (ed) Handbook of size exclusion chromatography and related techniques, 2nd edn., revised and expanded, Chromatogr Sci Ser, vol 91, Marcel Dekker, New York. Chap. 12
  Valtasaari L, Saarela K (1975) Determination of chain length distribution of cellulose by gel permeation chromatography using the tricarbanilate derivate. Pap Puu-Pap Tim 1:5–10
  Wood BF, Connor AH, Hill CG Jr (1986) The effect of precipitation on the molecular weight distribution of cellulose tricarbanilate. J Appl Polym Sci 32:3703–3712CrossRef
  Yanagisawa M, Shibata I, Isogai A (2004) SEC-MALLS analysis of cellulose using LiCl/1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone as an eluent. Cellulose 11:169–176CrossRef
  Yanagisawa M, Shibata I, Isogai A (2005) SEC-MALLS analysis of softwood kraft pulp using LiCl/1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone as an eluent. Cellulose 12:151–158CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：František Kačík (1)
  Štěpán Podzimek (2)
  Katarína Vizárová (3)
  Danica Kačíková (1)
  Iveta Čabalová (1)
  
  1. Faculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 53, Zvolen, Slovakia
  2. Synpo, a.s., S. K. Neumanna 1316, 530 02, Pardubice, Czech Republic
  3. Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37, Bratislava, Slovakia
  
• 刊物类别：Chemistry and Materials Science
• 刊物主题：Chemistry
  Bioorganic Chemistry
  Physical Chemistry
  Organic Chemistry
  Polymer Sciences
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-882X

文摘

Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) is currently the method most frequently used for molar mass determination of cellulose, being applied to either derivatized cellulose in the form of tricarbanilates (CTC) or nonderivatized cellulose in solution of lithium chloride in dimethylacetamide or 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone. In this work, we compared three methods of analysis of cellulose in paper subjected to accelerated ageing: size exclusion chromatography in combination with multiangle light scattering (SEC-MALS) detection, size exclusion chromatography in combination with diode-array detector and calibration using polystyrene standards (SEC-DAD), and asymmetric flow field–flow fractionation in combination with multiangle light scattering (A4F-MALS). Prior to separation, cellulose samples were derivatized with phenyl isocyanate to CTC and dissolved in tetrahydrofuran. Each of the methods provided different absolute values of molar mass, but pairwise correlations between them were linear with high correlation coefficients (r = 0.990–0.992). The highest molar mass values were obtained by the A4F-MALS method; SEC-MALS and SEC-DAD methods provided lower values, especially due to shear degradation of high-molecular cellulose chains. Keywords Cellulose Tricarbanilates (CTC) Degree of polymerization (DP) Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) Asymmetric flow field–flow fractionation (A4F) Paper degradation