Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Tomohisa Asai
- 关键词：Body ; ownership ; Agency ; Proprioceptive drift ; Self ; consciousness
- 刊名：Experimental Brain Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：May 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：234
- 期：5
- 页码：1163-1174
- 全文大小：684 KB
- 参考文献：Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc Biol Sci 270(1523):1499–1506CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Asai T (2015) Illusory body-ownership entails automatic compensative movement: for the unified representation between body and action. Exp Brain Res 233(3):777–785. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4153-0 CrossRef PubMed
Asai T, Mao Z, Sugimori E, Tanno Y (2011) Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations. Conscious Cogn 20:1744–1750. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.005 CrossRef PubMed
Asai T, Tanno Y (2013) Why must we attribute our own action to ourselves? Auditory hallucination like-experiences as the results both from the explicit self-other attribution and implicit regulation in speech. Psychiatry Res 207(3):179–188. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.055
Asai T, Tanno Y (2007) The relationship between the sense of self-agency and schizotypal personality traits. J Mot Behav 39:162–168. doi:10.3200/JMBR.39.3.162-168 CrossRef PubMed
Asai T, Tanno Y (2008) Highly schizotypal students have a weaker sense of self-agency. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 62:115–119. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01768.x CrossRef PubMed
Asai T, Sugimori E, Tanno Y (2008) Schizotypal personality traits and prediction of one’s own movements in motor control: what causes an abnormal sense of agency? Conscious Cogn 17:1131–1142. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.04.004 CrossRef PubMed
Bays PM, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2005) Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Curr biol CB 15:1125–1128. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.023 CrossRef PubMed
Bekrater-Bodmann R, Foell J, Diers M, Flor H (2012) The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain Res 1452:130–139. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001 CrossRef PubMed
Blakemore SJ, Smith J, Steel R, Johnstone CE, Frith CD (2000) The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychol Med 30(5):1131–1139
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756. doi:10.1038/35784 CrossRef PubMed
Chambon V, Haggard P (2012) Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance. Cognition 125:441–451. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.011 CrossRef PubMed
Chambon V, Wenke D, Fleming SM, Prinz W, Haggard P (2013) An Online Neural Substrate for Sense of Agency. Cereb Cortex 23:1031–1037. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs059 CrossRef PubMed
Costantini M, Haggard P (2007) The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Conscious Cogn 16:229–240. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001 CrossRef PubMed
Daprati E, Franck N, Georgieff N, Proust J, Pacherie E, Dalery J, Jeannerod M (1997) Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition 65:71–86CrossRef PubMed
David N, Newen A, Vogeley K (2008) The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 17:523–534. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004 CrossRef PubMed
Dummer T, Picot-Annand A, Neal T, Moore C (2009) Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 38:271–280CrossRef PubMed
Eliades SJ, Wang X (2008) Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex. Nature 453(7198):1102–1106. doi:10.1038/nature06910 CrossRef PubMed
Farrer C, Bouchereau M, Jeannerod M, Franck N (2008a) Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behav Neurol 19:53–57CrossRef PubMed
Farrer C, Frey SH, Van Horn JD, Tunik E, Turk D, Inati S, Grafton ST (2008b) The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cereb Cortex 18:254–261. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm050 CrossRef PubMed
Folegatti A, Farne A, Salemme R, de Vignemont F (2012) The Rubber Hand Illusion: two’s a company, but three’s a crowd. Conscious Cogn 21:799–812. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.008 CrossRef PubMed
Franck N, Farrer C, Georgieff N, Marie-Cardine M, Dalery J, d’Amato T, Jeannerod M (2001) Defective recognition of one’s own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:454–459CrossRef PubMed
Gallagher II (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4:14–21CrossRef PubMed
Giummarra MJ, Fitzgibbon BM, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Nicholls ME, Gibson SJ, Bradshaw JL (2010) Ouch! My phantom leg jumps/hurts when you stab “my” virtual hand. Perception 39:1396–1407CrossRef PubMed
Haggard P (2005) Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 9:290–295. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.012 CrossRef PubMed
Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5(4):382–385CrossRef PubMed
Hagni K, Eng K, Hepp-Reymond MC, Holper L, Keisker B, Siekierka E, Kiper DC (2008) Observing virtual arms that you imagine are yours increases the galvanic skin response to an unexpected threat. PLoS One 3:e3082. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003082 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH (2012) Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Fron Hum Neurosci 6:40. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040
Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47:204–211. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.028 CrossRef PubMed
Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P (2001) Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr biol CB 11:1188–1191CrossRef PubMed
Ladavas E, Serino A (2010) How the sense of body influences the sense of touch. In: Reuter-Lorenz PA, Baynes K, Mangun GR, Phelps EA (eds) The cognitive neuroscience of mind: a tribute to Michael S. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (USA), Gazzaniga
Lloyd DM (2007) Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn 64(1):104–109CrossRef PubMed
Longo MR, Schuur F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107:978–998. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004 CrossRef PubMed
Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279CrossRef PubMed
Miyazaki M, Hiraki K (2006) Delayed intermodal contingency affects young children’s recognition of their current self. Child Dev 77:736–750CrossRef PubMed
Newport R, Pearce R, Preston C (2010) Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale 204:385–395. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2104-y CrossRef PubMed
Nielsen TI (1963) Volition: a new experimental approach. Scand J Psychol 4:225–230CrossRef
Ocklenburg S, Rüther N, Peterburs J, Pinnow M, Güntürkün O (2011) Laterality in the rubber hand illusion. Laterality 16:174–187. doi:10.1080/13576500903483515 PubMed
Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2009) When right feels left: referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PLoS One 4:e6933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006933 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Preston C, Newport R (2011) Evidence for dissociable representations for body image and body schema from a patient with visual neglect. Neurocase 17(6):473–479. doi:10.1080/13554794.2010.532504 CrossRef PubMed
Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS One 6:e21659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021659 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Sanchez-Vives MV, Spanlang B, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Slater M (2010) Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS One 5:e10381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010381 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Sato A, Yasuda A (2005) Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 94:241–255. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.003 CrossRef PubMed
Schutz-Bosbach S, Tausche P, Weiss C (2009) Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain Cogn 70:136–144. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.006 CrossRef PubMed
Schwabe L, Blanke O (2007) Cognitive neuroscience of ownership and agency. Conscious Cogn 16:661–666. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.007 CrossRef PubMed
Shimada S, Fukuda K, Hiraki K (2009) Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One 4:e6185. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006185 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Shimada S, Qi Y, Hiraki K (2010) Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale 201:359–364. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2028-6 CrossRef PubMed
Sugimori E, Asai T (2014) Attribution of movement: Potential links between subjective reports of agency and output monitoring. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 1–17
Sugimori E, Asai T, Tanno Y (2011) Sense of agency over speech and proneness to auditory hallucinations: the reality-monitoring paradigm. Q J Exp Psychol 64:169–185. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.489261 CrossRef
Sugimori E, Asai T, Tanno Y (2013) The potential link between sense of agency and output monitoring over speech. Conscious Cogn 22:360–374. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.010 CrossRef PubMed
Tajadura-Jiménez A, Väljamäe A, Toshima I, Kimura T, Tsakiris M, Kitagawa N (2012) Action sounds recalibrate perceived tactile distance. Curr Biol 22(13):R516–R517. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.028
Taylor-Clarke M, Kennett S, Haggard P (2002) Vision modulates somatosensory cortical processing. Curr biol CB 12:233–236CrossRef PubMed
Toyomura A, Omori T (2005) Auditory feedback control during a sentence-reading task: effect of other’s voice. Acoust Sci Technol 26:358–361CrossRef
Troje NF (2002) Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. J vision 2:371–387. doi:10.1167/2.5.2 CrossRef
Tsakiris M (2010) My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48:703–712. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:80–91. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 15:423–432. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Hesse MD, Boy C, Haggard P, Fink GR (2007a) Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb Cortex 17:2235–2244. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl131 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Schutz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S (2007b) On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious Cogn 16:645–660. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.012 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Carpenter L, James D, Fotopoulou A (2010a) Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale 204:343–352. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3 CrossRef PubMed
Tsakiris M, Longo MR, Haggard P (2010b) Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48:2740–2749. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.021 CrossRef PubMed
van den Bos E, Jeannerod M (2002) Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition. Cognition 85:177–187CrossRef PubMed
Weiss C, Herwig A, Schütz-Bosbach S (2011) The self in action effects: selective attenuation of self-generated sounds. Cognition 121(2):207–218. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.011
Weiss C, Tsakiris M, Haggard P, Schutz-Bosbach S (2014) Agency in the sensorimotor system and its relation to explicit action awareness. Neuropsychologia 52:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.034 CrossRef PubMed
Weiss C, Schütz-Bosbach S (2012) Vicarious action preparation does not result in sensory attenuation of auditory action effects. Conscious Cogn 21(4):1654–1661. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.010
Wolpert DM (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1:209–216CrossRef PubMed
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882CrossRef PubMed
Zopf R, Savage G, Williams MA (2013) The crossmodal congruency task as a means to obtain an objective behavioral measure in the rubber hand illusion paradigm. J Vis Exp 77:e50530. doi:10.3791/50530 - 作者单位：Tomohisa Asai (1)
1. Human Information Science Laboratory, NTT Communication Science Laboratories, 3-1, Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi-shi, Kanagawa-ken, 243-0198, Japan - 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
- 刊物主题：Biomedicine
Neurosciences
Neurology - 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
- ISSN：1432-1106
文摘
Awareness of our own bodies (sense of body-ownership) and actions (sense of agency) is fundamental for self-consciousness. In the rubber hand illusion, watching a rubber hand being stroked synchronously as one’s own unseen hand is also stroked causes the observer to attribute the rubber hand to their own body. The findings of the series of experiments reported here suggest that body-ownership, measured using proprioceptive drift, is elicited by the external acting proxy that drives the sense of agency. While participants clasped and unclasped their left hand for 60 s, they focused on video feedback on a monitor in front of them. Proprioceptive drift was observed only under the conditions, including synchronized conditions, where the sense of agency for the acting proxy occurred, suggesting an essential interaction between body-ownership and agency.