Comparing the Slaking of Clay-Bearing Rocks Under Laboratory Conditions to Slaking Under Natural Climatic Conditions
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：T. P. Gautam ; A. Shakoor
- 关键词：Long ; term slaking behavior ; Slake durability index ; Disintegration ratio ; Clay ; bearing rocks ; Natural climatic conditions
- 刊名：Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：January 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：49
- 期：1
- 页码：19-31
- 全文大小：1,324 KB
- 参考文献：ASTM International (2008) Annual book of ASTM standards 2008, section 4, construction. ASTM International, PA
Bell FG, Entwisle DC, Culshaw MG (1997) A geotechnical survey of some British Coal Measures mudstones, with particular emphasis on durability. Eng Geol 46:11–129
Binal A (2009) A new laboratory rock test based on freeze-thaw using a steel chamber. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 42:179–198. doi:10.1144/1470-9236/08-040 CrossRef
Czerewko MA, Cripps JC (2001) Assessing the durability of mudrocks using modified jar slake index test. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 34:153–163CrossRef
Deo P (1972) Shales as embankment materials. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Purdue University. West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, p 201
Dick JC, Shakoor A (1992) Lithologic controls of mudrock durability. Q J Eng Geol 25:31–46CrossRef
Dick JC, Shakoor A, Wells N (1994) A geological approach toward developing a mudrock-durability classification system. Can Geotech J 31:17–27CrossRef
Erguler ZA, Shakoor A (2009) Quantification of fragment size distribution of clay-bearing rocks after slake durability testing. Environ Eng Geosci XV:81–89CrossRef
Erguler ZA, Ulusay R (2009) Assessment of physical disintegration characteristics of clay-bearing rocks: disintegration index test and a new durability classification chart. Eng Geol 105:11–19CrossRef
Franklin JA, Chandra A (1972) The slake durability test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:325–341CrossRef
Gautam TP, Shakoor A (2013) Slaking behavior of clay-bearing rocks during a one-year exposure to natural climatic conditions. Eng Geol 166:17–25CrossRef
Gokceoglu C, Ulusay R, Sonmez H (2000) Factors affecting the durability of selected weak and clay-bearing rocks from Turkey, with particular emphasis on the influence of the number of drying and wetting cycles. Eng Geol 57:215–237CrossRef
Hawkins B, Pinches GM (1992) Engineering description of mudrocks. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 28:253–266
Hudec PP (1982) Statistical analysis of shale durability factors. Trans Res Record 873. Trans Res Bd Washington, DC, pp 28–35
International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1976–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods: International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM). Ankara, Turkey
Kodama J, Goto T, Fuji Y, Hagen P (2013) The effects of water content, temperature and loading rate on strength and failure process of frozen rocks. Intl J Rock Mech Min Sci 62:1–13
Koncagül EC, Santi PM (1999) Predicting the unconfined compressive strength of Breathitt shale using slake durability, shore hardness and rock structural properties. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:139–153CrossRef
Olivier HJ (1979) A new engineering-geological rock durability classification. Eng Geol 14:255–279CrossRef
Potter PE, Maynard JB, Pryor WA (1980) Sedimentology of Shale. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Santi PM (1998) Improving the jar slake, slake index, and slake durability test for shales. Environ Eng Geosci IV:385–396CrossRef
Santi PM (2006) Field methods for characterizing weak rock for engineering. Environ Eng Geosci XII:1–11CrossRef
Santi PM, Higgins JD (1998) Methods for predicting shale durability in the field. Geotech Testing J 21:195–202CrossRef
Taylor RK (1988) Coal measures mudrocks: composition, classification and weathering processes. Q J Eng Geol 21:85–99CrossRef
Taylor RK, Smith TJ (1986) The engineering geology of clay minerals: swelling, shrinking and mudrock breakdown. Clay Min 21:235–260CrossRef
Walkinshaw JL, Santi PM (1996) Shales and other degradable material. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, special report 247. Transportation Research Board, pp 555–576
Weng MC, Li HH (2012) Relationship between the deformation characteristics and microscopic properties of sandstone explored by the bonded-particle model. Intl J Rock Mech Min Sci 56:34–43
Wood LE, Deo P (1975) A suggested system for classifying shale materials for embankments. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 12(1):39–55 - 作者单位：T. P. Gautam (1)
A. Shakoor (2)
1. Department of Petroleum Engineering and Geology, Marietta College, Marietta, OH, 45750, USA
2. Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA - 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
- 刊物主题：Earth sciences
Geophysics and Geodesy
Civil Engineering - 出版者：Springer Wien
- ISSN：1434-453X
文摘
The objective of this study was to compare the laboratory slaking behavior of common clay-bearing rocks to their slaking behavior under natural climatic conditions observed during a 1-year experimental study. Five-cycle slake durability tests were performed in the laboratory on five claystones, five mudstones, five siltstones, and five shales. Twelve replicate specimens of each of these 20 rocks were also exposed to natural climatic conditions for 12 months. After each month of exposure, one replicate specimen of each rock was removed from natural exposure and its grain size distribution was determined. The results of laboratory tests and field experiment were compared in terms of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th cycle slake durability indices (Id1, Id2, Id3, Id4, Id5), grain size distribution of slaked material, and disintegration ratio (D R), where D R is the ratio of the area under the grain size distribution curve of slaked material for a given specimen to the total area encompassing all grain size distribution curves of the specimens tested. Correlations of Id1, Id2, Id3, Id4, and Id5 with D R values for laboratory specimens exhibit R 2 values of 0.87, 0.88, 0.83, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively. However, the relationship between Id2 and D R, determined after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of natural exposure, becomes weaker with increasing time of exposure, with R 2 values of 0.65, 0.63, 0.63, and 0.25, respectively. The fifth-cycle slake durability index (Id5) for laboratory tested specimens shows a better correlation with D R values for naturally exposed specimens (R 2 up to 0.80). A comparison of grain size distribution curves of slaked material for laboratory specimens, after the 2nd cycle slake durability test, with those of specimens exposed to natural climatic conditions shows that the laboratory test underestimates the field durability for claystones, and overestimates it for siltstones.