参考文献:1.Hirsch BR, Califf RM, Cheng SK, Tasneem A, Horton J, Chiswell K, Schulman KA, Dilts DM, Abernethy AP (2013) Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA Intern Med 173:972–979CrossRef PubMed 2.Kirkham JJ, Gargon E, Clarke M, Williamson PR (2013) Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?—a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups. Trials 14:21CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral 3.Currie AC, Brigic A, Blencowe NS, Potter S, Faiz OD, Kennedy RH, Blazeby JM (2015) Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in laparoendoscopic colonic polyp resection. Br J Surg 102:e108–e116CrossRef PubMed 4.Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, Tugwell P (2012) Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 13:132CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral 5.Brigic A, Southgate A, Sibbons P, Clark SK, Fraser C, Kennedy RH (2013) Full-thickness laparoendoscopic colonic excision in an experimental model. Br J Surg 100:1649–1654CrossRef PubMed 6.Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral 7.Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, McNair AG, Brookes ST, Avery KN, Pullyblank AM, Sylvester PA, Jayne DG, Jones JE, Brown J, Coleman MG, Dutton SJ, Hackett R, Huxtable R, Kennedy RH, Morton D, Oliver A, Russell A, Thomas MG, Blazeby JM (2013) A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 15:e548–e560 8.Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, Blackstone EH, Cutlip DE, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Mack M, Mehran R, Miller C, Morel MA, Petersen J, Popma JJ, Takkenberg JJ, Vahanian A, van Es GA, Vranckx P, Webb JG, Windecker S, Serruys PW (2011) Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J 32:205–217CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral 9.Blencowe NS, McNair AG, Davis CR, Brookes ST, Blazeby JM (2012) Standards of outcome reporting in surgical oncology: a case study in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:4012–4018CrossRef PubMed
作者单位:Andrew C. Currie (1) Ronan Cahill (2) (3) Conor P. Delaney (4) Omar D. Faiz (1) (5) Robin H. Kennedy (1) (5)
1. Department of Surgery, Academic Institute, St Mark’s Hospital, Watford Rd, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK 2. Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 3. Department of Surgery, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland 4. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA 5. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
刊物类别:Medicine
刊物主题:Medicine & Public Health Surgery Gynecology Gastroenterology Hepatology Proctology Abdominal Surgery
出版者:Springer New York
ISSN:1432-2218
文摘
Background Full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision has been reported for complex endoscopically unresectable colonic polyps. However, the endpoints used in these studies vary significantly and therefore making definitive conclusions regarding the novel procedure would be improved if a common data set were adopted. This study sought to define most appropriate endpoints that should be measured and reported for research on full-thickness laparoendoscopic excision of colonic polyps.