Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Mika S. Ohno ; Monica L. Richardson ; Eric R. Sokol
- 关键词：Apical prolapse ; Cost ; effectiveness ; Decision analysis ; Modeling
- 刊名：International Urogynecology Journal
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：February 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：27
- 期：2
- 页码：233-237
- 全文大小：320 KB
- 参考文献：1.Rogers RG, Fashokun TB (2014) An overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. http://www.uptodate.com . Accessed 16 June 2014
2.Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL (2010) Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:501.e1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.017 CrossRef
3.Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24:1815–1833. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2172-1 CrossRef PubMed
4.Karram MM (2011) Abdominal sacral colpopexy. In: Baggish MS, Karram MM (eds) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier, St Louis, pp 505–518
5.Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev Issue 4. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5
6.Richardson ML, Elliott CS, Shaw JG, Comiter CV, Chen B, Sokol ER (2013) To sling or not to sling at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol 190:1306–1312. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.046 CrossRef PubMed
7.Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, Comiter CV, Payne CK, Chen B (2012) Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol 187:638–643. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.160 CrossRef PubMed
8.Medicare reimbursements by diagnosis related groups (2013) http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems.hmtl . Accessed 2 February 2014
9.Mittman N, Trakas K, Risebrough N, Liu BA (1999) Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population. Pharmacoeconomics 15:369–376CrossRef
10.Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Lewis C, Abell TD (2013) Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing robotic sacrocolpopexy to a vaginal mesh hysteropexy for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Open J Obstet Gynecol 3:613–620. doi:10.4236/ojog.2013.38110 CrossRef
11.Froberg DG, Kane RL (1989) Methodology for measuring health-state preferences – II: Scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol 42:459–471. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90136-4 CrossRef PubMed
12.Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70084-4 CrossRef PubMed
13.Lo T, Wang AC (1998) Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg 14:59–64. doi:10.1089/gyn.1998.14.59 CrossRef
14.Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.031 CrossRef PubMed
15.Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG (2000) Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making 20:332–342. doi:10.1177/0272989X0002000310 CrossRef PubMed
16.Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K (2012) A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med 366:2358–2367. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1111967 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
17.Beer M, Kuhn A (2005) Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119:144–155. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.042 CrossRef PubMed
18.Cheon C, Maher C (2013) Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 24:1873–1876. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2178-8 CrossRef PubMed
19.Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M et al (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309:2016–2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.4919 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed - 作者单位：Mika S. Ohno (1)
Monica L. Richardson (1)
Eric R. Sokol (1)
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm G332, Stanford, CA, 94305-5317, USA - 刊物主题：Gynecology; Urology/Andrology;
- 出版者：Springer London
- ISSN：1433-3023
文摘
Introduction and hypothesis For the surgical correction of apical prolapse the abdominal approach is associated with better outcomes; however, it is more expensive than the transvaginal approach. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) with sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to determine if the improved outcomes of ASC justify the increased expense.