Differentiated Citizenship and Contextualized Morality

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Eric J. Mitnick (1)
  
• 关键词：constitutive theory ; culture ; differentiated citizenship ; identity ; legal categorization ; rights ; self ; invention ; social group
• 刊名：Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
• 出版年：2004
• 出版时间：April 2004
• 年：2004
• 卷：7
• 期：2
• 页码：163-177
• 全文大小：77KB
• 参考文献：1. Barry, B., / Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  2. Barry, B., / Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
  3. Bell, D.A., / Race, Racism, and American Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973.
  4. Berman, P.S., The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment: Surveying the Benefits of a Cultural Analysis of Law, / Columbia Law Review 102(4) (2002), pp. 1129鈥?177.
  5. Carens, J.H., / Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  6. Engel, D.M., and Munger, F.W., / Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
  7. Ewick, P., and Silbey, S.S., / The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
  8. Fuller, L.L., / The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.
  9. Geertz, C., Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in / Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1983, pp. 167鈥?34.
  10. Gordon, R.W., Critical Legal Histories, / Stanford Law Review 36(1) (1984), pp. 57鈥?25.
  11. Hunt, A., / Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  12. Kelman, M., / A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  13. Kymlicka, W., / Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  14. Kymlicka, W., and Norman, W., / Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  15. Lopez, I.H., / White By Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
  16. McCann, M., Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being so Positive), / Law and Social Inquiry 21(2) (1996), pp. 457鈥?82.
  17. Merry, S.E., / Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
  18. Mezey, N., Out of the Ordinary: Law, Power, Culture, and the Commonplace, / Law and Social Inquiry 26(1) (2001), pp. 145鈥?67.
  19. Mill, J.S., / On Liberty. New York: Penguin, 1974 (1859).
  20. Minow, M., / Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
  21. Mitnick, E.J., Taking Rights Spherically: Formal and Collective Aspects of Legal Rights, / Wake Forest Law Review 34(2) (1999), pp. 409鈥?50.
  22. Mitnick, E.J., Constitutive Rights, / Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20(2) (2000), pp. 185鈥?04.
  23. Ramos, E.R., / The Legal Construction of Identity: The Judicial and Social Legacy of American Colonialism in Puerto Rico. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001.
  24. Rawls, J., / A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  25. Rawls, J., Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory, / Journal of Philosophy 77(9) (1980), pp. 515鈥?72.
  26. Raz, J., / The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
  27. Rosenfeld, M., / Affirmative Action and Justice: A Philosophical and Constitutional Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.
  28. Sarat, A.D., Redirecting Legal Scholarship in Law Schools, / Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 12(1) (2000), pp. 129鈥?50.
  29. Sarat, A., and Kearns, T.R., Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life,鈥?in / Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993, pp. 21鈥?1.
  30. Sarat, A., and Simon, J., Beyond Legal Realism? Cultural Analysis, Cultural Studies, and the Situation of Legal Scholarship, / Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 13(1) (2001), pp. 3鈥?2.
  31. Shachar, A., / Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  32. Smith, R.M., / Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
  33. Smith, R.M., Black and White After Brown: Constructions of Race in Modern Supreme Court Decisions, / University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 5(4) (2003), pp. 709鈥?33.
  34. Tussman, J., and ten Broek, J., The Equal Protection of the Laws, / California Law Review 37(3) (1948), pp. 341鈥?81.
  35. Walzer, M., / Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
  36. Walzer, M., / Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.
  37. Yngvesson, B., / Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge, 1993.
  38. Young, I.M., Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship, / Ethics 99(2) (1989), pp. 250鈥?74.
  
• 作者单位：Eric J. Mitnick (1)
  
  1. Thomas Jefferson School of Law, 2121 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, California, 92110, U.S.A
  

文摘

Political theorists, increasingly, are realizing the virtues of contextuality to conceptual analysis. Just as theory may provide useful standards for the assessment of political practices, so may application of theoretical constructs within particular contexts provide a critical corrective to theory. This essay relates work undertaken within sociolegal studies applying a constitutive methodology to such efforts to contextualize political theorizing. The essay describes how the emphasis placed by constitutive theory on locality and meaning entails a contextual analysis. The essay then demonstrates how a constitutive and contextual approach can enhance our understanding of the moral issues surrounding differentiated citizenship policy. While the most obvious cost associated with differentiated citizenship policy is a loss in formal equality, a contextual assessment demonstrates the prospect of an even deeper, though ultimately contingent, moral loss in self-invention.