Smart Specialisation in Cohesion Economies

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marek Tiits ; Tarmo Kalvet ; Imre Mürk
• 关键词：Smart specialisation (RIS3) ; Higher education ; R&D policy ; Innovation policy ; Economic development ; Cohesion
• 刊名：Journal of the Knowledge Economy
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：June 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：6
• 期：2
• 页码：296-319
• 全文大小：1,830 KB
• 参考文献：Akamatsu, K. (1935). Waga kuni yomo kogyohin no susei [Trend of Japanese trade in woolen goods]. Shogyo keizai ronso, 13, 129-12.
  Arnold, E., Good, B., & Segerpalm, H. (2008). The GSM story—effects of research on Swedish mobile telephone developments. VINNOVA analysis, 24. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
  Bernatonyte, D. (2011). Export productivity and specialization patterns of Lithuania. Kaunas: University of Technology.
  Cattaneo, O., Gereffi, G., & Staritz, C. (Eds.). (2010). Global value chains in a postcrisis world: a development perspective. Washington: The World Bank.
  Christensen, T. A., Freireich, S., Kolar, J., & Nybergh, P. (2012). Peer-review of the Estonian research and innovation system steady progress towards knowledge society. Expert group report prepared for the European Research Area Committee. Tallinn: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. Innovation Studies 19/2012.
  Cimoli, M. (Ed.). (2000). Developing innovation systems: Mexico in the global context. New York: Continuum-Pinter.
  Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the New Europe. Geofonwi, 23, 365-82.
  Coomans, G. (2004). Atlas of prospective labour supply. Dublin: Geolabour.
  Drechsler, W., Backhaus, J. G., Burlamaqui, L., Chang, H.-J., Kalvet, T., Kattel, R., Kregel, J., & Reinert, E. S. (2006). Creative destruction management in Central and Eastern Europe: meeting the challenges of the techno-economic paradigm shift. In T. Kalvet & R. Kattel (Eds.), Creative destruction management: meeting the challenges of the techno-economic paradigm shift (pp. 15-0). Praxis Centre for Policy Studies: Tallinn.
  Dunning, J. H. (1998). Globalization, technological change and the spatial organization of economic activity. In A. D. Chandler, P. Hagstrom, & O. Solvell (Eds.), The dynamic firm: the role of technology, strategy, organization and regions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2008). Small economy innovation systems: comparing globalisation, change, and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.View Article
  Elg, L., & H?kansson, S. (2012). Impacts of innovation policy—lessons from VINNOVA’s impact studies. Sweden: VINNOVA.
  Erawatch. (2012). Country reports 2012 Estonia. http://?erawatch.?jrc.?ec.?europa.?eu .
  Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8-), 1417-429.View Article
  European Commission. (2002). Innovation tomorrow. DG Enterprise Innovation Papers 28. Brussels: European Commission.
  European Commission. (2013). Sixth FP7 monitoring report. Brussels: European Commission.
  Eurostat. (2013). On-line database. http://?ec.?europa.?eu/?eurostat .
  Eurostat (2014). Statistics database. http://?epp.?eurostat.?ec.?europa.?eu/?portal/?page/?portal/?statistics/?search_?database .
  Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Foray, D., David, P. & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation—the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief 9. http://?ec.?europa.?eu/?invest-in-research/?pdf/?download_?en/?kfg_?policy_?brief_?no9.?pdf .
  Foray, D., David, P. A. & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialisation: from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI Working Paper. Lausanne: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne. http://?infoscience.?epfl.?ch/?record/-70252/?files/?MTEI-WP-2011-001-Foray_?David_?Hall.?pdf .
  Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X.G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS 3). http://?s3platform.?jrc.?ec.?europa.?eu/?c/?document_?library/?get_?file??uuid=?a39fd20b-9fbc-402b-be8c-b51d03450946&?groupId=-0157 .
  Freeman, C. (1987). National systems of innovation: the case of Japan technology policy and economics performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  Freeman, C. (1995). The national innovation systems in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-4.
  Freeman, C., & Lundvall, B.-?. (Eds.). (1988). Small countries facing technological revolution. London: Pinter.
  Hollanders, H. & Es-Sadki, N. (2013). Innovation union scoreboard. Brussels: European Commission. http://?ec.?europa.?eu/?enterprise/?policies/?innovation/?files/?ius-2013_?en.?pdf
  IBS (2011). Mid-term evaluation of the adoption of the EU structural funds 2007-013 in the fields of research and development, and higher education, http://?www.?ibs.?ee/?en/?publications/?item/-09-euroopa-liidu-t?ukefondide-perioodi-2007-2013-teadus--ja-arendustegevuse-ning-k?rghariduse-meetmete-rakendamise-vahehindamine .
  International Trade Centre (2014). Trademap. http://?trademap.?org .
  Karo, E. & Kattel, R. (2013). Public management, policy capaci
• 作者单位：Marek Tiits (1)
  Tarmo Kalvet (2)
  Imre Mürk (2)
  
  1. Institute of Baltic Studies, Lai 30, Tartu, 51005, Estonia
  2. Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, Tallinn, 19086, Estonia
  
• 刊物主题：Economic Policy; R & D/Technology Policy; Entrepreneurship;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1868-7873

文摘

With the rise of the smart specialisation (RIS3) concept, concentrating knowledge resources and linking them to a limited number of priority economic activities have become an important concept in the R&D, innovation and cohesion policies in the European Union. We conclude from the analysis of economic performance and effectiveness of the prior higher education, R&D and innovation policies in selected European small economies and theory that several crucial issues should be considered in translating the RIS3 into effective strategies. RIS3 was born to inform R&D policy making, and it emphasises predominantly R&D-based technological innovation. Yet, it is not sufficient to focus solely on the contribution of R&D to the upgrading of existing industry, when economic cohesion and structural change in industry is sought. Development of an effective RIS3 calls for, especially in the EU cohesion economies, substantial efforts to strengthen higher education, R&D job creation and capability building in future paradigm leading high-tech areas in particular. The role of foreign direct investments and relocation of industry in structural change should also be considered carefully. Finally, proper loop-back mechanisms have to be put in place in order to foster policy learning, and introduction of necessary policy adjustments as RIS3 gets implemented.