The competent demand pull hypothesis: which sectors do play a role?
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Cristiano Antonelli ; Agnieszka Gehringer
  • 关键词:Micro ; founded demand pull hypothesis ; Inter ; sector relations ; Productivity growth ; O30
  • 刊名:Economia Politica
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:April 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:32
  • 期:1
  • 页码:97-134
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069鈥?085.CrossRef
    Antonelli, C. (2008). Localized technological change: Towards the economics of complexity. London: Routledge.CrossRef
    Antonelli, C. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Antonelli, C. (2013). Knowledge governance: Pecuniary knowledge externalities and total factor productivity growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 62鈥?0.CrossRef
    Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2012). Knowledge externalities and demand pull: The European evidence. LEI & BRICK Working Paper n. 14.
    Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2013a). Demand pull and technological flows within innovation systems: The intra-European evidence. Department of Economics S. Cognetti de Martiis, Working Paper n. 01.
    Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2013b). The cost of knowledge and productivity dynamics: An empirical investigation on a panel of OECD countries. University of Turin and University of G枚ttingen, Mimeo.
    Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36(2), 274鈥?87.CrossRef
    Boyd, J., & Prescott, E. (1986). Financial intermediary-coalitions. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(2), 211鈥?32.CrossRef
    Crespi, F., & Pianta, M. (2007). Innovation and demand in European industries. Economia Politica Journal of Institutional and Analytical Economics, 24, 79鈥?12.
    Davidson, P. (2001). The principle of effective demand: Another view. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23(3), 392鈥?09.
    Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393鈥?14.CrossRef
    Doloreaux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2012). How much does KIBS contribute to R&D activities of manufacturing firms? Economia Politica Journal of Institutional and Analytical Economics, 3, 319鈥?42.
    Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoiti, J. N. (2012). Public Procurement for innovation as mission oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41(10), 1757鈥?769.CrossRef
    Gehringer, A. (2011). Pecuniary knowledge externalities across European countries鈥攁re there leading sectors? Industry and Innovation, 18(4), 415鈥?36.CrossRef
    Godin, B., & Lane, J. P. (2013). Pushes and pulls: Hi(S)tory of the demand pull model of innovation. Science Technology and Human Values, 38(5), 621鈥?54.CrossRef
    Greenwood, J., & Jovanovic, B. (1990). Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 1076鈥?107.CrossRef
    Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92鈥?16.CrossRef
    Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29鈥?7.CrossRef
    Jorgenson, D. W., Gollop, F. M., & Fraumeni, B. M. (1987). Productivity and U.S. economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches, Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249鈥?83.CrossRef
    Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance, entrepreneurship, and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 513鈥?42.CrossRef
    Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management, 28, 36鈥?5.
    Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), 102鈥?53.CrossRef
    Nelson, R. R. (2013). Demand supply and their interaction on markets as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(1), 17鈥?8.CrossRef
    Nelson, R. R., & Consoli, D. (2010). An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(5), 665鈥?87.CrossRef
    Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters, 5, 377鈥?81.CrossRef
    Saviotti, P. P., & Pyka, A. (2013a). From necessities to imaginary world: Structural change, product quality and economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1499鈥?512.CrossRef
    Saviotti, P. P., & Pyka, A. (2013b). The co-evolution of innovation demand and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(5), 461鈥?82. CrossRef
    Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149鈥?59.CrossRef
    Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312鈥?20.CrossRef
    Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783鈥?20.CrossRef
    Von Hippel, E. (1993). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429鈥?39.CrossRef
    Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Science, 44(5), 629鈥?44.CrossRef
    Weitzman, M. L. (1996). Hybridizing growth theory. American Economic Review, 86(2), 207鈥?12.
    Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331鈥?60.CrossRef
    Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • 作者单位:Cristiano Antonelli (1) (2)
    Agnieszka Gehringer (3)

    1. Dipartimento di Economia, Universit脿 di Torino, Lungo Dora Siena 100 A, 10153, Turin, Italy
    2. Collegio Carlo Alberto, BRICK (Bureau of Research on Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge), Via Real Collegio 30, Moncalieri, 10024, Turin, Italy
    3. Department of Economics, University of G枚ttingen, Platz der G枚ttinger Sieben 3, 37073, G枚ttingen, Germany
  • 刊物类别:Economic Policy; Political Economy;
  • 刊物主题:Economic Policy; Political Economy;
  • 出版者:Springer International Publishing
  • ISSN:1973-820X
文摘
The paper investigates intersectoral linkages between manufacturing and services under the competent demand pull hypothesis. This hypothesis postulates that the demand pulls the innovative capacities of the suppliers only when and if they are accompanied by qualified knowledge interactions with creative customers. We empirically investigate this hypothesis based on the sector-level data of nineteen (manufacturing and service) sectors in fifteen EU countries over the period 1995鈥?007. We adopt the input鈥搊utput framework to assess the strength of the inter-sectoral intermediate goods transactions. Our main findings confirm that demand actually pulls technological change only when it comes from competent customers able to implement effective user-producer knowledge interactions. The results stress the relevance of the transactions-cum-knowledge interactions between the knowledge intensive business service sectors and the manufacturing industries. Keywords Micro-founded demand pull hypothesis Inter-sector relations Productivity growth

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700