New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Andrew Hollingworth (1)
  Daniel J. Simons (2)
  Steven L. Franconeri (3)
  
• 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：July 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：72
• 期：5
• 页码：1298-1310
• 全文大小：267KB
• 参考文献：1. Abrams, R. A. , & Christ, S. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003). / Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 219鈥?23. CrossRef
  2. Brockmole, J. R. , & Henderson, J. M. (2005a). Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1061鈥?067.
  3. Brockmole, J. R. , & Henderson, J. M. (2005b). Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 857鈥?68. CrossRef
  4. Chua, F. K. (2009). A new object captures attention鈥攂ut only when you know its new. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 699鈥?11. CrossRef
  5. Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W. , & Heywood, C. A. (2004). Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: The special role of object onset. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 464鈥?77. CrossRef
  6. Cole, G. G. , & Kuhn, G. (2009). Appearance matters: Attentional orienting by new objects in the precueing paradigm. / Visual Cognition, 17, 755鈥?76. CrossRef
  7. Cole, G. G., Kuhn, G. , & Liversedge, S. P. (2007). Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 939鈥?43.
  8. Davoli, C. C., Suszko, J. W. , & Abrams, R. A. (2007). New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 338鈥?43.
  9. Downing, P. E. , & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. / Visual Cognition, 11, 689鈥?03. CrossRef
  10. Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R. , & Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1287鈥?302. CrossRef
  11. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W. , & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030鈥?044. CrossRef
  12. Franconeri, S. L., Hollingworth, A. , & Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention? / Psychological Science, 16, 275鈥?81. j.0956-7976.2005.01528.x">CrossRef
  13. Franconeri, S. L. , & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. / Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999鈥?010. CrossRef
  14. Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J. , & Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 876鈥?81.
  15. Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. / Visual Cognition, 7, 43鈥?4. CrossRef
  16. Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 519鈥?37. CrossRef
  17. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 396鈥?11. CrossRef
  18. Hollingworth, A. (2008). Visual memory for natural scenes. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), / Visual memory (pp. 123鈥?62). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
  19. Hollingworth, A. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene locaton. / Visual Cognition, 17, 273鈥?91. CrossRef
  20. Hollingworth, A. , & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 936鈥?49. CrossRef
  21. Hyun, J.-S., Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., Hollingworth, A. , & Luck, S. J. (2009). The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1140鈥?160. CrossRef
  22. Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R. , & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683鈥?02. CrossRef
  23. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. , & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. / Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175鈥?19. CrossRef
  24. Land, M. F., Mennie, N. , & Rusted, J. (1999). Eye movements and the roles of vision in activities of daily living: Making a cup of tea. / Perception, 28, 1311鈥?328. CrossRef
  25. Leber, A. B. , & Egeth, H. E. (2006). Its under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 132鈥?38.
  26. Luck, S. J. , & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention: From tasks to mechanisms. In S. Yantis (Ed.), / Stevens Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (pp. 235鈥?86). New York: Wiley.
  27. Luck, S. J. , & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. / Nature, 390, 279鈥?81. CrossRef
  28. Mitroff, S. R. , & Alvarez, G. A. (2007). Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1199鈥?204.
  29. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F. , & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1243鈥?265. CrossRef
  30. Pashler, H. (1998). / The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  31. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. / Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283鈥?90.
  32. Pylyshyn, Z. W. , & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. / Spatial Vision, 3, 179鈥?97. CrossRef
  33. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C. , & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. / Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279鈥?90.
  34. Schneider, W., Eschmann, A. , & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). / E-Prime users guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
  35. Simons, D. J. , & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16鈥?0. j.tics.2004.11.006">CrossRef
  36. Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W. , & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 248鈥?61. CrossRef
  37. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: / The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83鈥?0.
  38. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. / Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599鈥?06.
  39. Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65鈥?0.
  40. Thomas, S. J. , & Luck, S. J. (2000). / Multiple pathways to the automatic capture of attention. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  41. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S. , & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in realworld scenes: The role of global features in object search. / Psychological Review, 113, 766鈥?86. CrossRef
  42. Treisman, A. M. , & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. / Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97鈥?36. CrossRef
  43. Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. / Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 381鈥?89. CrossRef
  44. Woodman, G. F. , & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 363鈥?77. CrossRef
  45. Yantis, S. (2000). Goal directed and stimulus driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), / Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73鈥?03). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  46. Yantis, S. , & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 661鈥?76. CrossRef
  47. Yantis, S. , & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. / Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182鈥?04.
  48. Yantis, S. , & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95鈥?07. CrossRef
  49. Yantis, S. , & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601鈥?21. CrossRef
  50. Yantis, S. , & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121鈥?34. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Andrew Hollingworth (1)
  Daniel J. Simons (2)
  Steven L. Franconeri (3)
  
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, 11 Seashore Hall E, 52242-1407, Iowa City, IA
  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
  3. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
  

文摘

Attention capture occurs when a stimulus event involuntarily recruits attention. The abrupt appearance of a new object is perhaps the most well-studied attention-capturing event, yet there is debate over the root cause of this capture. Does a new object capture attention because it involves the creation of a new object representation or because its appearance creates a characteristic luminance transient? The present study sought to resolve this question by introducing a new object into a search display, either with or without a unique luminance transient. Contrary to the results of a recent study (Davoli, Suszko, & Abrams, 2007), when the new objects transient was masked by a brief interstimulus interval introduced between the placeholder and search arrays, a new object did not capture attention. Moreover, when a new objects transient was masked, participants could not locate a new object efficiently even when that was their explicit goal. Together, these data suggest that luminance transient signals are necessary for attention capture by new objects.