Agency and Ownership are Independent Components of ‘Sensing the Self-in the Auditory-Verbal Domain

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Daniela Hubl (1)
  Rahel C. Schneider (1)
  Mara Kottlow (1)
  Jochen Kindler (1)
  Werner Strik (1)
  Thomas Dierks (1)
  Thomas Koenig (1)
  
• 关键词：Language ; Self ; monitoring ; Corollary discharge ; Healthy controls ; Auditory evoked potential ; N100 ; Topography
• 刊名：Brain Topography
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：September 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：27
• 期：5
• 页码：672-682
• 全文大小：2,375 KB
• 参考文献：1. Allen P, Amaro E, Fu CH, Williams SC, Brammer MJ, Johns LC, McGuire PK (2007) Neural correlates of the misattribution of speech in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 190:162-69 CrossRef
  2. Baess P, Horvath J, Jacobsen T, Schroger E (2011) Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 48(9):1276-283 CrossRef
  3. Behroozmand R, Larson CR (2011) Error-dependent modulation of speech induced auditory suppression for pitch-shifted voice feedback. BMC Neurosci. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-54
  4. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert D, Frith C (2000) Why can’t you tickle yourself? NeuroReport 11:R11–R16 CrossRef
  5. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6:237-42 CrossRef
  6. Crapse TB, Sommer MA (2008) Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:587-00 CrossRef
  7. Curio G, Neuloh G, Numminen J, Jousmaki V, Hari R (2000) Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 9:183-91 CrossRef
  8. Dierks T, Linden DE, Jandl M, Formisano E, Goebel R, Lanfermann H, Singer W (1999) Activation of Heschl’s gyrus during auditory hallucinations. Neuron 22:615-21 CrossRef
  9. Eichele T, Nordby H, Rimol LM, Hugdahl K (2005) Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:405-12
  10. Feinberg I (1978) Efference copy and corollary discharge: implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophr Bull 4:636-40 CrossRef
  11. Fiez JA, Petersen SE (1998) Neuroimaging studies of word reading. PNAS USA 95:914-21 CrossRef
  12. Ford JM, Mathalon DH, Heinks T, Kalba S, Faustman WO, Roth WT (2001a) Neurophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:2069-071 CrossRef
  13. Ford JM, Mathalon DH, Kalba S, Whitfield S, Faustman WO, Roth WT (2001b) Cortical responsiveness during talking and listening in schizophrenia: an event-related brain potential study. Biol Psychiatry 50:540-49 CrossRef
  14. Ford JM, Gray M, Faustman WO, Roach BJ, Mathalon DH (2007) Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 44:522-29 CrossRef
  15. Ford JM, Mathalon DH (2012) Anticipating the future: automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol 83:232-39 CrossRef
  16. Fu CH, Vythelingum GN, Brammer MJ, Williams SC, Amaro E Jr, Andrew CM, Yaguez L, van Haren NE, Matsumoto K, McGuire PK (2006) An fMRI study of verbal self-monitoring: neural correlates of auditory verbal feedback. Cereb Cortex 16:969-77 CrossRef
  17. Gould L, Cummine J, Borowsky R (2012) The cognitive chronometric architecture of reading aloud: semantic and lexical effects on naming onset and duration. Front Hum Neurosci 6:287 CrossRef
  18. Heinks-Maldonado TH, Mathalon DH, Gray M, Ford JM (2005) Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 42:180-90 CrossRef
  19. Heinks-Maldonado TH, Mathalon DH, Houde JF, Gray M, Faustman WO, Ford JM (2007) Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:286-96 CrossRef
  20. Helmholtz Hv (1924) Helmholtz’s treatise on physiological optics. Optical Society of America, New York
  21. Holst Ev (1954) Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Br J Anim Behav 2:89-4 CrossRef
  22. Houde JF, Jordan MI (1998) Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279:1213-216 CrossRef
  23. Houde JF, Nagarajan SS, Sekihara K, Merzenich MM (2002) Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1125-138 CrossRef
  24. Hubl D, Koenig T, Strik WK, Garcia LM, Dierks T (2007) Competition for neuronal resources: how hallucinations make themselves heard. Br J Psychiatry 190:57-2 CrossRef
  25. Jackson JH (1958) Selected writings of John Hughlings. Basic Books, New York
  26. Johns LC, McGuire PK (1999) Verbal self-monitoring and auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. Lancet 353(9151):469-70 CrossRef
  27. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1745-758 CrossRef
  28. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH (2012) Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Front Hum Neurosci 6:40 CrossRef
  29. Koenig T, Kottlow M, Stein M, Melie-Garcia L (2011) Ragu: a free tool for the analysis of EEG and MEG event-related scalp field data using global randomization statistics. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:938925 CrossRef
  30. Koenig T, van Swam C, Dierks T, Hubl D (2012) Is gamma band EEG synchronization reduced during auditory driving in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations? Schizophr Res 141:266-70 CrossRef
  31. Kottlow M, Jann K, Dierks T, Koenig T (2012) Increased phase synchronization during continuous face integration measured simultaneously with EEG and fMRI. Clin Neurophysiol 123:1536-548 CrossRef
  32. Leube DT, Knoblich G, Erb M, Grodd W, Bartels M, Kircher TT (2003) The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. Neuroimage 20:2084-090 CrossRef
  33. Macphee GJ, Crowther JA, McAlpine CH (1988) A simple screening test for hearing impairment in elderly patients. Age Ageing 17:347-51 CrossRef
  34. Maidhof C, Vavatzanidis N, Prinz W, Rieger M, Koelsch S (2010) Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: an ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci 22:2401-413 CrossRef
  35. McCarthy-Jones S, Trauer T, Mackinnon A, Sims E, Thomas N, Copolov DL (2012) A new phenomenological survey of auditory hallucinations: evidence for subtypes and implications for theory and practice. Schizophr Bull. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs156
  36. Michel CM, Koenig T, Brandeis D (2009) Electrical neuroimaging in the time domain. In: Michel CM, Koenig T, Brandeis D, Gianotti LRR, Wackermann J (eds) Electrical neuroimaging. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 111-43 CrossRef
  37. Nahab FB, Kundu P, Gallea C, Kakareka J, Pursley R, Pohida T, Miletta N, Friedman J, Hallett M (2011) The neural processes underlying self-agency. Cereb Cortex 21:48-5 CrossRef
  38. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lutkenhoner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W (1988) Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:160-70 CrossRef
  39. Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24(Suppl D):5-2
  40. Raij TT, Valkonen-Korhonen M, Holi M, Therman S, Lehtonen J, Hari R (2009) Reality of auditory verbal hallucinations. Brain 132:2994-001 CrossRef
  41. Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43(6):482-89 CrossRef
  42. Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD (1998) Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:406-13 CrossRef
  43. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Voss M (2013) The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Front Psychol 4:127 CrossRef
  44. van Veen V, Carter CS (2002) The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol Behav 77:477-82 CrossRef
  45. Wang L, Metzak PD, Woodward TS (2011) Aberrant connectivity during self-other source monitoring in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 125:136-42 CrossRef
  46. Wirth M, Horn H, Koenig T, Razafimandimby A, Stein M, Mueller T, Federspiel A, Meier B, Dierks T, Strik W (2008) The early context effect reflects activity in the temporo-prefrontal semantic system: evidence from electrical neuroimaging of abstract and concrete word reading. Neuroimage 42:423-36 CrossRef
  47. Wirth M, Jann K, Dierks T, Federspiel A, Wiest R, Horn H (2011) Semantic memory involvement in the default mode network: a functional neuroimaging study using independent component analysis. Neuroimage 54:3057-066 CrossRef
  48. Wurtz RH (2008) Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability. Vision Res 48:2070-089 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Daniela Hubl (1)
  Rahel C. Schneider (1)
  Mara Kottlow (1)
  Jochen Kindler (1)
  Werner Strik (1)
  Thomas Dierks (1)
  Thomas Koenig (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychiatric Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bolligenstrasse 111, CH-3000, Bern 60, Switzerland
  
• ISSN：1573-6792

文摘

’Sensing the self-relies on the ability to distinguish self-generated from external stimuli. It requires functioning mechanisms to establish feelings of agency and ownership. Agency is defined causally, where the subjects action is followed by an effect. Ownership is defined by the features of the effect, independent from the action. In our study, we manipulated these qualities separately. 13 right-handed healthy individuals performed the experiment while 76-channel EEG was recorded. Stimuli consisted of visually presented words, read aloud by the subject. The experiment consisted of six conditions: (a) subjects saw a word, read it aloud, heard it in their own voice; (b) like a, but the word was heard in an unfamiliar voice; (c) subject heard a word in his/her own voice without speaking; (d) like c, but the word was heard in an unfamiliar voice; (e) like a, but subjects heard the word with a delay; (f) subjects read without hearing. ERPs and difference maps were computed for all conditions. Effects were analysed topographically. The N100 (86-72?ms) displayed significant main effects of agency and ownership. The topographies of the two effects shared little common variance, suggesting independent effects. Later effects (174-00?ms) of agency and ownership were topographically similar, suggesting common mechanisms. Replicating earlier studies, significant N100 suppression was observed, with a topography resembling the agency effect. ‘Sensing the self-appears to recruit from at least two very distinct processes: an agency assessment that represents causality and an ownership assessment that compares stimulus features with memory content.