Re-thinking local causality
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Simon Friederich (1)
  • 关键词:Quantum theory ; Special relativity ; Causality ; Probability ; Principal Principle
  • 刊名:Synthese
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:January 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:192
  • 期:1
  • 页码:221-240
  • 全文大小:241 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Albert, D. Z., & Galchen, R. (2009). Was Einstein wrong?: A quantum threat to special relativity. / Scientific American, / 2009, 32-9. CrossRef
    2. Bell, J. S. (2004). / Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
    3. Butterfield, J. N. (2007). Stochastic Einstein locality revisited. / British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, / 58, 805-67. jps/axm034" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    4. Cavalcanti, E. G. (2010). Causation, decision theory, and Bell’s theorem: a quantum analogue of the Newcomb problem. / British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, / 61, 359-97. jps/axp050" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    5. Cusbert, J. (2013). The Arrow of Chance, PhD thesis, submitted at The Australian National University.
    6. Eberhard, P. H. (1978). Bell’s theorem and the different concepts of locality. / Nuovo Cimento, / 46B, 392-19. CrossRef
    7. Friederich, S. (2011). How to spell out the epistemic conception of quantum states. / Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, / 42, 149-57. j.shpsb.2011.01.002" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    8. Friederich, S. (2013). In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states. / Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, / 44, 77-2. j.shpsb.2013.01.002" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    9. Friederich, S. (2014). / Interpreting Quantum Theory: A Therapeutic Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Gell-Mann, M., Goldberger, M. L., & Thirring, W. E. (1954). Use of causality conditions in quantum theory. / Physical Review, / 95, 1612-627. CrossRef
    11. Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1980). A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. / Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, / 27, 293-98. CrossRef
    12. Gisin, N. (2009). Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it? / Science, / 326, 1357-358. CrossRef
    13. Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Tausk, D. V., & Zanghi, N. (2011). Bell’s theorem. / Scholarpedia, / 6, 8378. CrossRef
    14. Haag, R. (1993). / Local Quantum Physics (corrected ed.). Berlin: Springer.
    15. Hall, N. (1994). Correcting the guide to objective chance. / Mind, / 103, 505-17. CrossRef
    16. Hall, N. (2004). Two mistakes about credence and chance. / Australasian Journal of Philosophy, / 82, 93-11. CrossRef
    17. Healey, R. A. (2012). Quantum theory: a pragmatist approach. / British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, / 63, 729-71. jps/axr054" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    18. Healey, R. A. (2014). Causality and chance in relativistic quantum field theories, / Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.03.002 .
    19. Jarrett, J. (1984). On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments. / Nous, / 18, 569-89. CrossRef
    20. Lewis, D. (1986 [1980]). A subjectivists’s guide to objective chance. In / Philosophical papers, (Vol. II, pp. 83-32). New York: Oxford University Press (originally published from Studies in inductive logic and probability, Vol. II by, R. C. Jeffrey Ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.)
    21. Lewis, D. (1994). Humean supervenience debugged. / Mind, / 103, 473-90.
文摘
There is widespread belief in a tension between quantum theory and special relativity, motivated by the idea that quantum theory violates J. S. Bell’s criterion of local causality, which is meant to implement the causal structure of relativistic space-time. This paper argues that if one takes the essential intuitive idea behind local causality to be that probabilities in a locally causal theory depend only on what occurs in the backward light cone and if one regards objective probability as what imposes constraints on rational credence along the lines of David Lewis-Principal Principle, then one arrives at the view that whether or not Bell’s criterion holds is irrelevant for whether or not local causality holds. The assumptions on which this argument rests are highlighted, and those that may seem controversial are motivated.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700