Comparison of fetal outcome in premature vaginal or cesarean breech delivery at 24-7 gestational weeks
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Mia Vidovics (1)
Volker R. Jacobs (1) (2)
Thorsten Fischer (1) (2)
Barbara Maier (1) (2) (3) - 关键词：Preterm breech presentation ; Fetal outcome ; Mode of delivery ; Cesarean section ; Vaginal delivery
- 刊名：Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：August 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：290
- 期：2
- 页码：271-281
- 全文大小：443 KB
- 参考文献：1. Breckwoldt M, Pfleiderer A (2008) Regelwidrige und pathologische Geburt. In: Breckwoldt M, Kaufmann M, Pfleiderer A (eds) Gyn?kologie und Geburtshilfe. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 437-72
2. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2003) Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166
3. Demol S, Bashiri A, Furman B, Maymon E, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M (2000) Breech presentation is a risk factor for intrapartum and neonatal death in preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93(1):47-1 CrossRef
4. Anderson G, Strong C (1988) The premature breech; caesarean section or trial of labour? J Med Ethics 14(1):18-4 CrossRef
5. Mailàth-Pokorny M, Preyer O, Dadak C, Lischka A, Mittlb?ck M, Wagenbichler P, Laml T (2009) Breech presentation: a retrospective analysis of 12-years-experience at a single center. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121(5-):209-15 CrossRef
6. Kayem G, Baumann R, Goffinet F, El Abiad S, Ville Y, Cabrol D, Haddad B (2008) Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(3):289.e1-89.e6 CrossRef
7. Hogle L, Hutton E, McBrien K, Barrett J, Hannah M (2003) Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):220-27 CrossRef
8. Hellsten C, Lindqvist PG, Olofsson P (2003) Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 111(2):122-28 CrossRef
9. Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, Bréart G (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002-011 CrossRef
10. Hopkins LM, Esakoff T, Noah MS, Moore DH, Sawaya GF, Laros RK Jr (2007) Outcomes associated with cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery at a university hospital. J Perinatol 27:141-46 CrossRef
11. Alfirevic Z, Milan SJ, Livio S (2013) Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000078.pub3
12. Huurre A, Kalliomaki M, Rautava S, Rinne M, Salminen S, Isolauri E (2008) Mode of delivery—effects on gut microbiota and humoral immunity. Neonatology 93:236-40 CrossRef
13. Schaub B, Lauener R, von Mutius E (2006) The many faces of the hygiene hypothesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117(5):969-77 CrossRef
14. Westgren LMR, Songster G, Paul Rh (1985) Preterm breech delivery: another retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 66(4):481-84
15. Cibils LA, Karrison T, Brown L (1994) Factors influencing neonatal outcomes in very low birthweight fetus (<1500?g) with a breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:35-2 CrossRef
16. Spinillo A, Stronati M, Ometto A, Fazzi E, de Seta F, Iasci A (1992) The influence of presentation and method of delivery on neonatal mortality and infant neurodevelopmental outcome in nondiscordant low-birthweight (<2500?g) twin gestations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47(3):189-94 CrossRef
17. Lindqvist A, Norden-Lindeberg S, Hanson U (1997) Perinatal mortality and route of delivery in term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(11):1288-291 CrossRef
18. Giuliani A, Sch?ll WMJ, Basver A, Tamussino KF (2002) Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(6):1694-698 CrossRef
19. Kayem G, Goffinet F, Clément D, Hessabi M, Cabrol D (2002) Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993 through 1999. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102(2):137-42 CrossRef
20. Maier B, Georgoulopoulos A, Zajc M, Jaeger T, Zuchna C, Hasenoehrl G (2011) Fetal outcomes for infants in breech presentation by method of delivery: experiences with a stand-by service system of senior obstetricians and women’s choices of mode of delivery. J Perinatal Med 39:385-90 CrossRef
21. Rydhstr?m H, Ingemarsson I, Ohrlander S (1990) Lack of correlation between a high caesarean section rate and improved prognosis for low-birthweight twins (<2.500?g). BJOG 97(3):229-33 CrossRef
22. Menticoglou SM (2006) Why vaginal breech delivery should still be offered. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28(5):380-85
23. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 356(9239):1375-383 CrossRef
24. Glezerman M (2006) Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(1):20-5 CrossRef
25. Lawson GW (2012) The term breech trial ten years on: primum non nocere? Birth 39(1):3- CrossRef
26. Lodha A, Zhu Q, Lee SK, Shah PS (1025) Canadian neonatal network. Neonatal outcomes of preterm infants in breech presentation according to mode of birth in Canadian NICUs. Postgrad Med J 2011(87):175-79
27. Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D (2001) Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98(2):186-92 CrossRef
28. Münstedt K, von Georgi R, Reucher S, Zygmunt M, Lang U (2001) Term breech and long-term morbidity—cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 96(2):163-67 CrossRef
29. Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME (2004) Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the term breech trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111(10):1065-074 CrossRef
30. Bergenhenegouwen LA, Meertens LJE, Schaaf J, Nijhuis JG, Mol BW, Kok M, Scheepers HC (2014) Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 172:1-40 CrossRef
31. Lumley J (2003) Method of delivery for the preterm infant. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110(20):88-2 CrossRef
32. Hartnack Tharin JE, Rasmussen S, Krebs L (2011) Consequences of the term breech trial in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:767-71 CrossRef
33. Lagercrantz H, Slotkin TA (1986) The “stress-of being born. Sci Am 254(4):100-07 CrossRef
34. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 93(3):332-37 CrossRef - 作者单位：Mia Vidovics (1)
Volker R. Jacobs (1) (2)
Thorsten Fischer (1) (2)
Barbara Maier (1) (2) (3)
1. Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Müllner Hauptstr. 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
2. Frauenklinik (OB/GYN), University Hospital of Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanusch General Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Str. 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria - ISSN：1432-0711
文摘
Purpose To compare the fetal outcome of preterm breech infants delivered vaginally (VD) or by cesarean section (CS). Methods A monocentric, retrospective consecutive case series of preterm breech deliveries between 24-7 gestational weeks over 10?years from 1/2000 to 12/2009 was performed in a perinatal care center (Level 1) at the University Clinic of Salzburg, Austria. Data from hospital database were statistically analyzed and compared regarding birth weight, head circumference, parity, transfer rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), arterial and venous cord blood pH and base excess (BE), arterial cord blood pH?≤?.10 and BE?≤??11. Special focus was on fetal outcome of elective CS preterm breech deliveries with a non-urgent medical indication compared to VD. Results Among 22.115 deliveries, there were 346 live-born preterm singletons and twins in breech presentation (1.56?%), born between 24?+?0 and 37?+?0 gestational weeks. 180 CS and 36 vaginally delivered preterm breech infants were statistically evaluated. On comparing CS vs. VD for premature breech singletons, arterial cord blood pH and BE were lower in the VD group. VD twins had a lower arterial cord blood pH than CS twins. All other parameters were comparable. In preterm breech singletons with non-urgent CS, a statistical analysis was not possible due to small numbers. The VD twin group revealed lower values in birth weight, head circumference, arterial cord blood pH and BE, but no significant difference in venous cord blood pH and BE and transfer rate to NICU. Conclusions Although general recommendations regarding a superior mode of delivery for improved fetal outcome of preterm breech infants cannot be given, these data do not support a policy of routine CS.