Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Georg Macharey ; Veli-Matti Ulander ; Seppo Heinonen…
• 关键词：Breech presentation ; Mode of delivery ; Cesarean ; Mortality ; Morbidity ; Induction
• 刊名：Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：293
• 期：3
• 页码：549-555
• 全文大小：400 KB
• 参考文献：1.Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). August 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://​www.​ahrq.​gov/​research/​data/​hcup/​index.​html
  2.Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C et al (2007) Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 109(3):669–677CrossRef PubMed
  3.Macharey G, Ulander VM, Kostev K, Vaisanen-Tommiska M, Ziller V (2014) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and risk factors by mode of delivery and obstetric history: a 10-year review from Helsinki University Central Hospital. J Perinat Med
  4.Louwen F, Leuchter LM, Reitter A (2012) Breech presentation—more than just caesarean vs. spontaneous birth. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 216(4):191–194CrossRef PubMed
  5.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(3):179–193
  6.Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383CrossRef PubMed
  7.Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002–1011CrossRef PubMed
  8.Haheim LL, Albrechtsen S, Berge LN, Bordahl PE, Egeland T, Henriksen T et al (2004) Breech birth at term: vaginal delivery or elective cesarean section? A systematic review of the literature by a Norwegian review team. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):126–130CrossRef PubMed
  9.Hellsten C, Lindqvist PG, Olofsson P (2003) Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 111(2):122–128CrossRef PubMed
  10.Toivonen E, Palomaki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J (2012) Selective vaginal breech delivery at term—still an option. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(10):1177–1183CrossRef PubMed
  11.Ulander VM, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O (2004) Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):180–186CrossRef PubMed
  12.Alarab M, Regan C, O’Connell MP, Keane DP, O’Herlihy C, Foley ME (2004) Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol 103(3):407–412CrossRef PubMed
  13.Bogner G, Strobl M, Schausberger C, Fischer T, Reisenberger K, Jacobs VR (2014) Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance. J Perinat Med
  14.Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H et al (2009) SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no. 226, June 2009. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(2):169–176CrossRef PubMed
  15.Berger, R., J. Dudenhausen, A. Feige, W. Gonser, B.J. Hackelöer (federführend), H. Halle, M. Häusler, F. Kainer, M. Kühnert, KTM Schneider, K. Vetter, E. Weiss, J. Wisser (2006) Geburt bei Beckenendlage. Available at: http://​www.​agmfm-ev.​de/​_​download/​unprotected/​g_​04_​04_​03_​geburt_​bei_​beckenendlage.​pdf
  16.Carbonne B, Frydman R, Goffinet F, Pierre F, Subtil D (2001) Voie d’accouchement en cas de présentation du siège. Available at: http://​www.​cngof.​asso.​fr/​D_​PAGES/​PURPC_​08.​HTM
  17.Hofmeyr G. THE MANAGEMENT OF BREECH PRESENTATION. 2014; Available at: https://​www.​rcog.​org.​uk/​globalassets/​documents/​guidelines/​gtg-no-20b
  eech-presentation.​pdf
  18.Liu A, Lv J, Hu Y, Lang J, Ma L, Chen W (2014) Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(4):897–906CrossRef PubMed
  19.Gissler M, Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, Chalmers J, Macfarlane A, Gaizauskiene A et al (2010) Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project. Inform Health Soc Care 35(2):64–79CrossRef PubMed
  20.O’Herlihy C (1981) Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 11(5):299–303CrossRef PubMed
  21.Fait G, Daniel Y, Lessing JB, Bar-Am A, Gull I, Shenhav M et al (1998) Can labor with breech presentation be induced? Gynecol Obstet Invest 46(3):181–186CrossRef PubMed
  22.Rojansky N, Tsafrir A, Ophir E, Ezra Y (2001) Induction of labor in breech presentation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 74(2):151–156CrossRef PubMed
  23.ACOG Committee Opinion (2006) Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Available at: http://​www.​acog.​org/​Resources-And-Publications/​Committee-Opinions/​Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/​Mode-of-Term-Singleton-Breech-Delivery
  24.Kongress für Perinatale Medizin, editor. Geburtseinleitung bei Beckenendlage–durchaus eine Option—Ergebnisse über 5 Jahre aus einer deutschen Universitätsklinik. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011; 215 - FV02_02. doi:10.​1055/​s-0031-1293217 ; 1.–3. 12. 2011; Berlin: Thieme; 2011
  25.Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA, Crown WH, Davey P, Hutchins D et al (2003) A checklist for retrospective database studies–report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases. Value Health 6(2):90–97
  26.Hants Y, Kabiri D, Elchalal U, Arbel-Alon S, Drukker L (2015) Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Archiv Gynecol Obstet 292(2):313–319
  27.Franks Z, Nightingale R (2014) Decreased fetal movements: a practical approach in a primary care setting. Aust Fam Physician 43(11):782–785PubMed
  28.Krebs L (2005) Breech at term. Early and late consequences of mode of delivery. Dan Med Bull 52(4):234–252PubMed
  29.Luterkort M, Persson PH, Weldner BM (1984) Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 64(1):55–59PubMed
  30.Rosenstein MG, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB (2012) Risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 120(1):76–82PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  31.Vlemmix F, Bergenhenegouwen L, Schaaf JM, Ensing S, Rosman AN, Ravelli AC et al (2014) Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(9):888–896CrossRef PubMed
  32.Reinhard J, Sänger N, Hanker L, Reichenbach L, Yuan J, Herrmann E, Louwen F (2013) Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery. Archiv Gynecol Obstet 287(4):663–668
  
• 作者单位：Georg Macharey (1)
  Veli-Matti Ulander (1)
  Seppo Heinonen (1)
  Karel Kostev (2)
  Mika Nuutila (1)
  Mervi Väisänen-Tommiska (1)
  
  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
  2. Department of Health and Social Affairs, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Idstein, Germany
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Gynecology
  Obstetrics and Perinatology
  Endocrinology
  Human Genetics
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-0711

文摘

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate whether induction of breech delivery at term is feasible and safe for mother and child compared with spontaneous vaginal breech delivery.