Improvement on species sensitivity distribution methods for deriving site-specific water quality criteria

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yeyao Wang (1) (2)
  Lingsong Zhang (1)
  Fansheng Meng (1)
  Yuexi Zhou (1)
  Xiaowei Jin (2)
  John P. Giesy (3)
  Fang Liu (2)
  
  1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment ; Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences ; Beijing ; 100012 ; China
  2. China National Environmental Monitoring Center ; Beijing ; 100012 ; China
  3. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre ; University of Saskatchewan ; Saskatoon ; Saskatchewan ; Canada
  
• 关键词：SSD ; Water quality criteria ; Plotting position ; Threshold ; Stratified sampling ; Site ; specific ; Asia ; Ammonia ; Nitrogen ; Toxicity ; Statistics
• 刊名：Environmental Science and Pollution Research
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：April 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：7
• 页码：5271-5282
• 全文大小：448 KB
• 参考文献：Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality volume 2 aquatic ecosystems-rationale and background information. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council. Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra
  1. Baird, DJ, Brink, PJ (2007) Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67: pp. 296-301 CrossRef
  2. Benson, MA (1962) Plotting positions and economics of engineering planning. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng Hydraul Div 88: pp. 57-71
  A protocol for the derivation of water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg
  3. Christensen, FM, Bruijn, JHM, Hansen, BG (2003) Assessment tools under the new European Union chemicals policy. Greener Manag Int 41: pp. 5-19 9774/GLEAF.3062.2003.sp.00003" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  4. Daniel, J (2011) Sampling essentials: practical guidelines for making sampling choices. SAGE Publications, Inc, Los Angeles
  5. Davies, PE, Cook, LSJ, Goenarso, D (1994) Sublethal responses to pesticides of several species of Australian fresh-water fish and crustaceans and rainbow trout. Environ Toxicol Chem 13: pp. 1341-1354 CrossRef
  6. Dyer, SD, Belanger, SE, Carr, GJ (1997) An initial evaluation of the use of Eur/North American fish species for tropical effects assessments. Chemosphere 35: pp. 2767-2781 97)00273-7" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  7. Forbes, VE, Calow, P (2002) Species sensitivity distributions revisited: a critical appraisal. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3: pp. 473-492 90879781" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  8. France, KE, Duffy, JE (2006) Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function. Nature 441: pp. 1139-1143 9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  9. Giesy, JP, Odum, EP (1980) Microcosmology: the theoretical basis. Microcosms in ecological research. DOE CONF 781101. Department of Energy Technical Information Center, Oak Ridge, TN
  10. Giesy, JP, Solomon, KR, Coats, JR (1999) Ecological risk assessment of chlorpyrifos in North American aquatic environments. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 160: pp. 1-129
  11. Groombridge, B, Jenkins, MD Global biodiversity: responding to the change. In: Groombridge, B, Jenkins, MD eds. (2002) World atlas of biodiversity: earth鈥檚 living resources in the 21st century. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 195-223
  12. Hooper, DU, Chapin, FS, Ewel, JJ (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: pp. 3-35 90/04-0922" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Hose, GC, Brink, PJ (2004) Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47: pp. 511-520 CrossRef
  14. Jager, T, Posthuma, L, Zwart, D (2007) Novel view on predicting acute toxicity: decomposing toxicity data in species vulnerability and chemical potency. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67: pp. 311-322 CrossRef
  15. Jin, XW, Zha, JM, Xu, YP (2011) Derivation of aquatic predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) for 2,4-dichlorophenol: comparing native species data with non-native species data. Chemosphere 84: pp. 1506-1511 CrossRef
  16. Jin, XW, Wang, YY, Giesy, JP, Richardson, K, Wang, ZJ (2014) Development of aquatic life criteria in China: viewpoint on the challenge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21: pp. 61-66 CrossRef
  17. Jordaan I (2005) Decisions under uncertainty. Cambridge University Press
  18. Kooijman, SALM (1987) A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. Water Res 21: pp. 269-276 90205-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  19. Langbein, WB (1960) Plotting positions in frequency analysis. USGS Water Supply Paper, Washington
  20. Makkonen, L (2006) Plotting positions in extreme value analysis. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45: pp. 334-340 9.1" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  21. Maltby, L, Blake, N, Brock, TCM (2005) Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: pp. 379-388 97/04-025R.1" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  22. Okkerman, PC, Plassche, EJ, Emans, HJB (1993) Validation of some extrapolation methods with toxicity data derived from multiple species experiments. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25: pp. 341-359 993.1031" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  23. Posthuma, L, Suter, GW, Traas, TP (2002) Environmental and ecological risk assessment: species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Washington
  24. Rice JA (2011) Mathematical statistics and data analysis third edition. Thomson Brooks/Cole 2007Duxbury, 138
  25. RIVM (2007) Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the framework of 鈥淚nternational and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands鈥?Bilthoven the Netherlands
  26. Schroer, AFM, Belgers, D, Brock, TCM, Maund, SJ, Brink, PJ (2004) Acute toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin to invertebrates of lenthic freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46: pp. 324-335 CrossRef
  27. Slooff, W (1983) Benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality assessment, some toxicological considerations. Aquat Toxicol 4: pp. 73-82 90062-0" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  28. Tilman, D, Reich, PB, Knops, JMH (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade long grassland experiment. Nature 441: pp. 629-632 CrossRef
  Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. Office of Research and Development Environmental Research Laboratories, Duluth, Minnesota
  Update of ambient water quality criteria for ammonia. Office of Water, Washington
  Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for ammonia-freshwater. Office of Water, Washington
  29. Vaal, M, Wall, JT, Hetmens, J (1997) Pattern analysis of the variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. Chemosphere 35: pp. 1291-1309 97)00166-5" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  30. Straalen, NM, Denneman, CAJ (1989) Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18: pp. 241-251 9)90018-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  31. Versteeg, DJ, Belanger, SE, Carr, GJ (1999) Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: data-based comparison. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: pp. 1329-1346
  32. VROM (1989) Premises for risk management. Risk limits in the context of environmental policy. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), Second chamber, session 1988鈥?989, 21137, no 5, The Hague, the Netherlands
  33. Wagner, C, L酶kke, H (1991) Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25: pp. 1237-1242 91)90062-U" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  34. Wang, Z, Jin, XY, Wang, ZJ (2014) Taxon-specific sensitivity difference of copper to aquatic organisms. Asian J Ecotoxicol 9: pp. 640-646
  35. Worm, B, Barbier, EB, Beaumont, N (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: pp. 787-790 94" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  36. Wu, FC, Mu, YS, Chang, H (2013) Predicting water quality criteria for protecting aquatic life from physicochemical properties of metals or metalloids. Environ Sci Technol 47: pp. 446-453 9h" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  37. Zhang, XJ, Qin, HW, Su, LM (2010) Interspecies correlations of toxicity to eight aquatic organisms: theoretical considerations. Sci Total Environ 408: pp. 4549-4555 CrossRef
  38. Zhang, LS, Wang, YY, Meng, FS (2014) Study on species selection methods in deriving water quality criteria for aquatic life. Environ Sci 35: pp. 3959-3969
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Environment
  Environment
  Atmospheric Protection, Air Quality Control and Air Pollution
  Waste Water Technology, Water Pollution Control, Water Management and Aquatic Pollution
  Industrial Pollution Prevention
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1614-7499

文摘

Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) is the most common method used to derive water quality criteria, but there are still issues to be resolved. Here, issues associated with application of SSD methods, including species selection, plotting position, and cutoff point setting, are addressed. A preliminary improvement to the SSD approach based on post-stratified sampling theory is proposed. In the improved method, selection of species is based on biota of a specific basin, and the whole species in the specific ecosystem are considered. After selecting species to be included and calculating the cumulative probability, a new method to set the critical threshold for protection of ecosystem-level structure and function is proposed. The alternative method was applied in a case study in which a water quality criterion (WQC) was derived for ammonia in the Songhua River (SHR), China.