An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bernard T. Haylen (1) (17)
  Robert M. Freeman (2)
  Steven E. Swift (3)
  Michel Cosson (4)
  G. Willy Davila (5)
  Jan Deprest (6)
  Peter L. Dwyer (7)
  Brigitte Fatton (8)
  Ervin Kocjancic (9)
  Joseph Lee (10)
  Chris Maher (11)
  Eckhard Petri (12)
  Diaa E. Rizk (13)
  Peter K. Sand (14)
  Gabriel N. Schaer (15)
  Ralph J. Webb (16)
  
• 关键词：Classification ; Complication ; Prosthesis ; Mesh ; Graft ; Female pelvic floor surgery
• 刊名：International Urogynecology Journal
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：January 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：22
• 期：1
• 页码：3-15
• 全文大小：1426KB
• 参考文献：1. Stedman鈥檚 Medical Dictionary (2006) Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
  2. Concise Oxford Dictionary (1995). Clarendon Press, Oxford
  3. Dwyer PL (2006) Evolution of biological and synthetic grafts in reconstructive pelvic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 17:S10鈥揝15 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0103-0">CrossRef
  4. Duncan HJ, Nurse DE, Mundy AR (1992) Role of the artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of stress incontinence in women. Br J Urol 69:141鈥?43 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1992.tb15484.x">CrossRef
  5. Aldridge AH (1942) Transplantation of fascia for relief of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 44:398
  6. Stamey TA (1973) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136:547鈥?54
  7. Ulmsten UJ, Johnson P, Rezapour M (1999) A three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:345鈥?50 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08272.x">CrossRef
  8. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V (2004) Transobturator tape (Urotape). A new minimally invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 45:203鈥?07 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.12.001">CrossRef
  9. Amid P (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their relative complications in an abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15鈥?1 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02426382">CrossRef
  10. Rosch R, Junge K, H枚lzl F et al (2004) How to construct a mesh. In: Schumpelick V, Nyhus LM (eds) Meshes: benefits and risks. Springer, Berlin, pp 179鈥?84
  11. Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M et al (2006) The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J 17:S16鈥揝25 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0101-2">CrossRef
  12. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501鈥?06 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6">CrossRef
  13. Davila GW (2006) Introduction to the 2005 IUGA Grafts Roundtable. Int Urogynecol J 17:S4鈥揝5 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0105-y">CrossRef
  14. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010). An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5鈥?6 and Neurourol Urodyn 29:4鈥?0
  15. Simonds RJ, Homberg SD, Hurwitz RL (1992) Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from seronegative organ tissue donor. N Engl J Med 326:726鈥?30 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199203123261102">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Bernard T. Haylen (1) (17)
  Robert M. Freeman (2)
  Steven E. Swift (3)
  Michel Cosson (4)
  G. Willy Davila (5)
  Jan Deprest (6)
  Peter L. Dwyer (7)
  Brigitte Fatton (8)
  Ervin Kocjancic (9)
  Joseph Lee (10)
  Chris Maher (11)
  Eckhard Petri (12)
  Diaa E. Rizk (13)
  Peter K. Sand (14)
  Gabriel N. Schaer (15)
  Ralph J. Webb (16)
  
  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia
  17. St Vincent鈥檚 Clinic, Suite 904, 438 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, 2010, N.S.W., Australia
  2. Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  3. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
  4. University Hospital, Lille, France
  5. Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL, USA
  6. University Hospital, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  7. Mercy Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  8. University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  9. Department of Urology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
  10. Monash Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  11. Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  12. Urogynaecology Department, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
  13. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  14. Evanston Continence Centre, Evanston, IL, USA
  15. Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland
  16. Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norfolk, UK
  

文摘

Introduction and hypothesis A terminology and standardized classification has yet to be developed for those complications arising directly from the insertion of synthetic (prostheses) and biological (grafts) materials in female pelvic floor surgery. Methods This report on the above terminology and classification combines the input of members of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS) and a Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology, assisted at intervals by many expert external referees. An extensive process of 11 rounds of internal and external review took place with exhaustive examination of each aspect of the terminology and classification. Decision-making was by collective opinion (consensus). Results A terminology and classification of complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery has been developed, with the classification based on category (C), time (T) and site (S) classes and divisions, that should encompass all conceivable scenarios for describing insertion complications and healing abnormalities. The CTS code for each complication, involving three (or four) letters and three numerals, is likely to be very suitable for any surgical audit or registry, particularly one that is procedure-specific. Users of the classification have been assisted by case examples, colour charts and online aids (www.icsoffice.org/complication). Conclusions A consensus-based terminology and classification report for prosthess and grafts complications in female pelvic floor surgery has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and research.