Key-Phrases as Means to Estimate Birth and Death Years of Jewish Text Authors

详细信息    查看全文

• 关键词：Hebrew ; Aramaic documents ; Key ; phrases ; Key ; words ; Knowledge discovery ; Time analysis ; Undated documents ; Undated references
• 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：9398
• 期：1
• 页码：108-126
• 全文大小：1,742 KB
• 参考文献：1.Wintner, S.: Hebrew computational linguistics: past and future. Artif. Intell. Rev. 21(2), 113–138 (2004)MATH MathSciNet CrossRef
  2.HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Kass, A., Peretz, A.: HAADS: a Hebrew Aramaic abbreviation disambiguation system. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. JASIST 61(9), 1923–1932 (2010)CrossRef
  3.Gutwin, C., Paynter, G., Witten, I., Nevill-Manning, C., Frank, E.: Improving browsing in digital libraries with key-phrase indexes. Decis. Support Syst. 27(1), 81–104 (1999)CrossRef
  4.Zhang, Y., Zincir-Heywood, N., Milios, E.: World wide web site summarization. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 2(1), 39–53 (2004)MATH
  5.Hulth, A., Megyesi, B.B.: A study on automatically extracted key-words in text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 537–544 (2006)
  6.Kim, S.N., Baldwin, T.: Extracting key-words from multi-party live chats. In: Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, pp. 199–208 (2012)
  7.Berend, G.: Opinion expression mining by exploiting key-phrase extraction. In: IJCNLP, pp. 1162–1170 (2011)
  8.Liu, Z., Huang, W., Zheng, Y., Sun, M.: Automatic key-phrase extraction via topic decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ACL, pp. 366–376 (2010)
  9.Hasan, K.S., Ng, V.: Conundrums in unsupervised key-phrase extraction: making sense of the state-of-the-art. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, ACL, pp. 365–373 (2010)
  10.Medelyan, O., Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Human-competitive tagging using automatic key-phrase extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3, ACL, pp. 1318–1327 (2009)
  11.Kim, S.N., Medelyan, O., Kan, M.Y., Baldwin, T.: Automatic key-phrase extraction from scientific articles. Lang. Resour. Eval. 47(3), 723–742 (2013)CrossRef
  12.Yih, W.T., Goodman, J., Carvalho, V.R.: Finding advertising key-words on web pages. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 213–222. ACM (2006)
  13.Garfield, E.: Can citation indexing be automated? In: Stevens, M. (ed.) Statistical Association Methods for Mechanical Documentation, Symposium Proceedings, National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publication 269, pp. 189–142 (1965)
  14.Berkowitz, E., Elkhadiri, M.R.: Creation of a style independent intelligent autonomous citation indexer to support academic research, pp. 68–73 (2004)
  15.Giuffrida, G., Shek, E.C., Yang, J.: Knowledge-based metadata extraction from PostScript files. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Digital libraries, pp. 77–84. ACM (2000)
  16.Seymore, K., McCallum, A., Rosenfeld, R.: Learning hidden markov model structure for information extraction. In: AAAI-99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Extraction, pp. 37–42 (1999)
  17.Ritchie, A., Robertson, S., Teufel, S.: Comparing citation contexts for information retrieval. In the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pp. 213–222 (2008)
  18.Bradshaw, S.: Reference directed indexing: redeeming relevance for subject search in citation indexes. In: Koch, T., Sølvberg, I.T. (eds.) ECDL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2769, pp. 499–510. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRef
  19.HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Beck, H., Yehudai, E., Rosenstein, M., Mughaz, D.: Cuisine: classification using stylistic feature sets and/or name-based feature sets. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (JASIST) 61(8), 1644–1657 (2010)
  20.HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Mughaz, D.: Estimating the birth and death years of authors of undated documents using undated citations. In: Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E., Helgadóttir, S. (eds.) IceTAL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6233, pp. 138–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef
  21.Mughaz, D., HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Gabbay, D.: When text authors lived using undated citations. In: Lamas, D., Buitelaar, P. (eds.) IRFC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8849, pp. 82–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
  22.HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Schweitzer, N., Mughaz, D.: Automatically identifying citations in Hebrew-Aramaic documents. Cybern. Syst. Int. J. 42(3), 180–197 (2011)CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Dror Mughaz (18) (19)
  Yaakov HaCohen-Kerner (19)
  Dov Gabbay (18) (20)
  
  18. Department of Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, 5290002, Ramat-Gan, Israel
  19. Department of Computer Science, Lev Academic Center, 9116001, Jerusalem, Israel
  20. Department of Informatics, Kings College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
  
• 丛书名：Semantic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources
• ISBN：978-3-319-27932-9
• 刊物类别：Computer Science
• 刊物主题：Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
  Computer Communication Networks
  Software Engineering
  Data Encryption
  Database Management
  Computation by Abstract Devices
  Algorithm Analysis and Problem Complexity
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1611-3349

文摘

In this study, we try to determine the time-frame in which the author of a given document lived. The discussed documents are rabbinic documents written in the Hebrew, Aramaic and Yiddish languages. The documents are usually undated and do not contain a bibliographic section, which leaves us with an interesting challenge to determine the desired time-frame. To do this, we define a set of key-phrases and formulate various types of rules: “Iron-clad”, Heuristic and Greedy constraints, to define the time-frame. These rules are based on key-phrases and key-words in the documents of the authors. Identifying the time-frame of an author can help us determine the generation in which specific documents were written, can help in the examination of documents, i.e., to conclude if documents were edited, and can also help us identify an anonymous author. We tested these rules on two corpuses of documents, which were authored by 12 and 24 rabbinic authors, respectively, and the results are promising.