A Derived Transformation of Valence Functions Across Two 8-Member Comparative Relational Networks
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Micah Amd ; Bryan Roche
  • 关键词:Relational frame theory ; Transitive inference ; Transformation of function ; Valence
  • 刊名:The Psychological Record
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:September 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:65
  • 期:3
  • 页码:523-540
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:Amd, M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). A derived transformation of evaluative preferences using Implicit Association Tests. The Psychological Record, 64, 475鈥?85. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/321/art%253A10.1007%252Fs40732-014-0033-z.pdf?auth66=1421915528_f6f535efbbd514b1cb38c48868ef8123&ext=.pdf.
    Amd, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Ivanoff, J. (2013). A derived transfer of eliciting emotional functions using differences among electroencephalograms as a dependent measure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99(3), 318鈥?34. doi:10.鈥?002/鈥媕eab.鈥?9 .PubMed CrossRef
    Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 45鈥?1. doi:10.鈥?901/鈥媕aba.鈥?007.鈥?-06 .PubMed Central PubMed CrossRef
    De Almeida, J. H., & de Rose, J. C. (2015). Changing the meaningfulness of abstract stimuli by the reorganization of equivalence classes: effects of delayed matching. The Psychological Record. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠40732-015-0120-9 .
    Delius, J. D., & Siemann, M. (1998). Transitive responding in animals and humans: exaptation rather than adaptation? Behavioural Processes, 42(2/3), 107鈥?37. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥婼0376-6357(97)00072-7 .PubMed CrossRef
    Doran, E., & Fields, L. (2012). All stimuli are equal, but some are more equal than others: measuring relational preferences within an equivalence class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98(3), 243鈥?56. doi:10.鈥?901/鈥媕eab.鈥?012.鈥?8-243 .PubMed Central PubMed
    Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62(3), 331鈥?51. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid鈥?鈥?334471&tool鈥?鈥塸mcentrez&rendertype鈥?鈥塧bstract.
    Dougher, M., Perkins, D. R., Greenway, D., Koons, A., & Chiasson, C. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 63鈥?3. doi:10.鈥?901/鈥媕eab.鈥?002.鈥?8-63 .PubMed Central PubMed CrossRef
    Dymond, S., Schlund, M. W., Roche, B., & Whelan, R. (2014). The spread of fear: symbolic generalization mediates graded threat-avoidance in specific phobia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 247鈥?59. doi:10.鈥?080/鈥?7470218.鈥?013.鈥?00124 .CrossRef
    Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 342鈥?53. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2319446.
    Gavin, A., Roche, B., & Ruiz, M. R. (2008). Competing contingencies over derived relational responding: a behavioral model of the Implicit Association Test. The Psychological Record, 58, 427鈥?41.
    Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464鈥?480. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9654756.
    Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197鈥?16. doi:10.鈥?037/鈥?022-3514.鈥?5.鈥?.鈥?97 .PubMed CrossRef
    Guez, D., & Audley, C. (2013). Transitive or not: a critical appraisal of transitive inference in animals. Ethology, 119(9), 703鈥?26. doi:10.鈥?111/鈥媏th.鈥?2124 .CrossRef
    Hayes, S. C., Barnes-holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A Post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=n4RmapzrihAC&pgis=1.
    Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion, 24(8), 1377鈥?388. doi:10.鈥?080/鈥?269993090348507鈥? .CrossRef
    Martin, N., & Alsop, B. (2004). Transitive inference and awareness in humans. Behavioural Processes, 67(2), 157鈥?65. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媌eproc.鈥?004.鈥?3.鈥?17 .PubMed CrossRef
    Munnelly, A., Dymond, S., & Hinton, E. C. (2010). Relational reasoning with derived comparative relations: a novel model of transitive inference. Behavioural Processes, 85(1), 8鈥?7. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媌eproc.鈥?010.鈥?5.鈥?07 .PubMed CrossRef
    O鈥橳oole, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smyth, S. (2007). A derived transfer of functions and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 263鈥?83. doi:10.鈥?901/鈥媕eab.鈥?007.鈥?6-06 .PubMed Central PubMed CrossRef
    Ridgeway, I., Roche, B., Gavin, A., & Ruiz, M. R. (2010). Establishing and eliminating Implicit Association Test effects in the laboratory: Extending the behavior-analytic model of the IAT, 2(2), 133鈥?50.
    Roche, B., & Dymond, S. (2008). A transformation of functions in accordance with the nonarbitrary relational properties of sexual stimuli. The Psychological Record, 58, 71鈥?0.
    Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User鈥檚 guide. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Incorporated. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=5372168343504638999#0.
    Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56(3), 519鈥?55. doi:10.鈥?901/鈥媕eab.鈥?991.鈥?6-519 .PubMed Central PubMed CrossRef
    Vasconcelos, M. (2008). Transitive inference in non-human animals: an empirical and theoretical analysis. Behavioural Processes, 78(3), 313鈥?34. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媌eproc.鈥?008.鈥?2.鈥?17 .PubMed CrossRef
    Weaver, J. E., Steirn, J. N., & Zentall, T. R. (1997). Transitive inference in pigeons: control for differential value transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 113鈥?17. doi:10.鈥?758/鈥婤F03210782 .CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Micah Amd (1)
    Bryan Roche (1)

    1. Maynooth University, Maynooth, Leinster, Ireland
  • 刊物类别:Psychology, general;
  • 刊物主题:Psychology, general;
  • 出版者:Springer International Publishing
  • ISSN:2163-3452
文摘
The emergence of transitive relations between stimuli that had never been directly paired with one another can be examined through a phenomenon called Transitive Inference (TI). The present experiment explored contextually controlled TI effects in verbally able humans. Specifically, participants were trained in the conditional discriminations A1+B1-, B1+C1-, C1+D1-, D1+E1-, E1+F1-, F1+G1- and G1+H1- in the presence of a cue (Cue 1), followed by tests for mutual and combinatorial entailment in the presence of either Cue 1 or Cue 2. Note that Cue 1 and Cue 2 had been previously established as functionally equivalent to happier-than and unhappier-than contexts, respectively. Using a performance-based measure of 鈥渋mplicit preferences,鈥?we predicted that successfully demonstrating entailment would yield a performance indicating C1 as more positively valenced than F1. Similarly, if participants learned the discriminations A2+B2-, B2+C2-, C2+D2-, D2+E2-, E2+F2-, F2+G2-, G2+H2- in the presence of Cue 2 only, followed by tests for entailment in the presence of both Cues 1 and 2, we predicted that C2 should be responded to as more negatively valenced than F2. Performances across both conditions supported these predictions, furthering the evidence for the claim that emotional valences can be derived through functionally transitive stimulus-stimulus relations. Keywords Relational frame theory Transitive inference Transformation of function Valence

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700