The need for universal metrics in the energy-water-food nexus

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：A. D. Tevar ; H. M. Aelion ; M. A. Stang…
• 关键词：Food ; energy ; water ; Metrics ; Nexus ; Social stickiness ; Innovation
• 刊名：Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：6
• 期：1
• 页码：225-230
• 全文大小：293 KB
• 参考文献：ADB (2013) Thinking about water differently: managing the water-food-energy nexus
  Alkire S, Foster J (2010) Designing the Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index, OPHI WORKING PAPER NO. 37
  Bazilian M, Rogner H, Howells M, Hermann S, Arent D, Gielen D, Yumkella K (2011) Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 7896–7906
  Beshears J, Francesca G (2015) Leaders as Decision Architects, Harvard Business Review May
  Cheung N, Howell J (2014) Tribute to George Heilmeier, inventor of liquid crystal display, former DARPA director, and industry technology leader. IEEE 52(6):12–13
  Crocker D (2008) Ethics of global development: agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press
  Desowitz RS. (1987) New guinea tapeworms and Jewish grandmothers: tales of parasites and people paperback
  Etskowitz H (2000) The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
  Finley J, Seiber J (2014) The nexus of food, energy, and water. J Agric Food Chem 6255–6262. doi:10.​1021/​jf501496r
  Hoff H (2011) Understanding the nexus. background paper for the Bonn2011 Conference: the water, energy and food security nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm
  Khan S, Khan M, Hanjra M, Mu J (2009) Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production. Food Policy 141–149
  Koning N, Ittersum M, Becx G, Boekel M, Brandenburg W, Broek J, Smies M (2008) Long-term global availability of food: continued abundance or new scarcity? NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci 229–292
  Lifepump (2015) Online available at: http://​www.​doutreach.​org/​current-projects/​
  Lundvall BA (ed) (2010) National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press
  Miller D (2002) A framework for evaluating computer supported collaborative learning. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society 5(1):112–118
  Murphy, C., & Allen, D. (2011). Energy-water nexus for mass cultivation of algae. Environ Sci Technol 5861–5868
  National Science Foundation (2014) Food, energy, and water: transformative research opportunities in the Mathematical and Physical Sciences
  Rasul G (2014) Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: a nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region☆. Environ Sci Policy 35–48
  SAB Miller, WWF (2014) The Water-food-energy nexus: insights into resilient development
  Siddiqi A, Anadon L (2011) The water–energy nexus in Middle East and North Africa. Energy Policy 4529–4540
  Spiertz, J., & Ewert, F. (2009). Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 281–300.
  Walker R, Beck M, Hall J, Dawson R, Heidrich O (2014) The energy-water-food nexus: strategic analysis of technologies for transforming the urban metabolism. J Environ Manag 104–115. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jenvman.​2014.​01.​054
  Zamft BM, Conrado RJ (2015) Engineering plants to reflect light: strategies for engineering water-efficient plants to adapt to a changing climate. Plant Biotechnol J 867–874. doi:10.​1111/​pbi.​12382
  
• 作者单位：A. D. Tevar (1) (3)
  H. M. Aelion (2)
  M. A. Stang (3)
  J. Mendlovic (3)
  
  1. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
  3. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Environment, general; Sustainable Development;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：2190-6491

文摘

The ability for a new food-energy-water (FEW) initiative or program to thrive and prove valuable at a local, national, or international scale is often critically dependent not on the power or impressiveness of its technical innovation, but the ability for that innovation to be introduced, and subsequently welcomed, into a society. As the global population expands, there is an inevitable increase in competition for vital resources. The interaction of these resources—namely, food-energy-water—is referred to as the FEW Nexus. Water is the key resource that is in limited supply, and as the demand grows for energy and food dependent on it, so does global inequality and suffering. It is only through technical and socially aware innovations that these allocation issues can be addressed. Universal metrics, though flawed, are needed to help compare and contrast new FEW Nexus projects and technologies for those that need to plan and implement interventions to improve access to these vital resources. Social stickiness, or society’s willingness and ability to adopt and apply FEW Nexus interventions, is a vital component of these universal metrics. Social stickiness measures the ability of innovations to be successfully transferred from “science lab” to “social life” in order to educate and improve the global quality of existence through widespread and educated user adoption. Existing FEW program/technology metrics usually define an output per unit input (e.g., kWh/m3) and are limited to two areas the FEW Nexus with an obvious, but undefined association to the third (e.g., less water for agriculture). All technical metrics appear to treat the FEW Nexus as a static problem with no social or cultural context. Consequently, universal metrics should include a social measure of the target population as well as the traditional output/input measurements. The United Nations’ inequality-adjusted human development index (IHDI) could be a way to quickly include a social component to assess an innovation’s usability and improvement in the global community. The FEW needs and constraints found in developed and developing countries vary drastically, meaning that any universal metric that is created will not account for the complexity of the international situation, but would still be a useful tool to compare and contrast different innovations for local non-experts seeking to implement them.