Comparison of direct-measured and derived short form six dimensions (SF-6D) health preference values among chronic hepatitis B patients

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Carlos K. H. Wong (1)
  Elegance T. P. Lam (1)
  Cindy L. K. Lam (1)
  
• 关键词：Chronic hepatitis B ; Health preference ; SF ; 6D ; SF ; 36 ; Sensitivity ; Discriminative power
• 刊名：Quality of Life Research
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：December 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：22
• 期：10
• 页码：2973-2981
• 全文大小：
• 作者单位：Carlos K. H. Wong (1)
  Elegance T. P. Lam (1)
  Cindy L. K. Lam (1)
  
  1. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
  
• ISSN：1573-2649

文摘

Purpose The short form six dimensions (SF-6D) are derived from the SF-36 Health Survey with the intention that item data of the latter are often converted to a preference value, which was subsequently used in economic evaluations of interventions. The aim was to compare the equivalence and sensitivity of health preference values derived from the SF-36/SF-12 Health Surveys to that measured directly by the SF-6D for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the SF-6D and SF-36 data from a baseline sample of 589 patients with CHB infection with different stages of liver diseases. Degree of agreement (equivalence) between direct-measured and derived SF-6D values was determined using spearman correlation and intra-class correlation. Sensitivity and discriminative power of different SF-6D values were compared by standardized effect size and relative efficiency (RE) statistics. Results Significant differences in the direct-measured or derived SF-6D preference values were found between CHB groups. Degree of agreement between SF-6D values was satisfactory. Direct-measured SF-6D was the most efficient, followed by SF-12-derived and the SF-36-derived was the least, based on the standardized effect size and the RE statistics. Sensitivity and discriminative power of direct-measured SF-6D were superior to derived SF-6D among people with different CHB health states. Conclusions Although direct-measured and derived SF-6D preference values had satisfactory sensitivity in discriminating between CHB groups, direct-measured SF-6D is the most sensitive and preferable method of obtaining health preference.