Assessment of liquefaction potential of Erzincan Province and its vicinity, Turkey
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：E. Subas? Duman (1)
S. B. Ikizler (2) - 关键词：Erzincan earthquake ; Liquefaction hazard ; Liquefaction potential map
- 刊名：Natural Hazards
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：September 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：73
- 期：3
- 页码：1863-1887
- 全文大小：2,966 KB
- 参考文献：1. Aky?ld?r?m A (1993) In terms of engineering geology survey of Erzincan location area in accordance with settlement. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, M. Sc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University
2. Aydan ?, Sezaki M, Yarar R (1996) The Seismic characteristic of Turkish earthquakes. Eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering, Mexico, pp 1-
3. Ayothiraman R, Raghu Kanth STG, Sreelatha S (2012) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of Guwahati: gateway city to Northeastern India. Nat Hazards 63:449-60 CrossRef
4. Dixit J, Dewaikar DM, Jangid RS (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759-768 CrossRef
5. Emre O, Kondo H, Ozalp S, Elmaci H, Kurcer A (2010) Fault geometry and slip distribution associated with the 1939 Erzincan Earthquake (M: 7.9), North Anatolian Fault. Geophy Res Abstr 12:EGU2010-2551
6. Gurenko E, Lester R, Mahul O, Gonulal SO (2006) Earthquake insurance in Turkey, history of the Turkish catastrophe insurance pool. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 136 pp
7. Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. The Oxford Engineering Science Series, Oxford
8. Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F (1981) Soil liquefaction potential evaluation with use of the simplified procedure. International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, pp 209-14
9. Karanl?k S (2006) Determination of liquefaction risk in Hatay Altinkoy region. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, M. Sc. Thesis, Cukurova University
10. Kaypak B (2002) Determination of 3-D velocity structure of the Erzincan basin by local earthquake tomography. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, Ph. D. Thesis, Istanbul University
11. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, 1996
12. Kramer SL, Mayfield RT (2007) Return period of soil liquefaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(7):802-13 CrossRef
13. Robertson PK, Fear CE (1995) Liquefaction of sands and its evaluation. Proceedings of the First Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tokyo
14. Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442-59 CrossRef
15. Saatcioglu M, Bruneau M (1993) Performance of structures during the 1992 Erzincan earthquake. Can J Civ Eng 20:305-25 CrossRef
16. Saglam M (2008) Investigation of liquefaction potential of Saruhanl? (Manisa) municipality sites. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, M. Sc. Thesis, Gazi University
17. Samui P, Sitharam TG (2011) Machine learning modeling for predicting soil liquefaction susceptibility. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1- CrossRef
18. Saylan S (2006) Liquefaction potential analysis of Erzincan basin due to shear wave velocity. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, M. Sc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University
19. Seed HB, De Alba P (1986) Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of soils. Proceedings of the specialty conference on the use of in situ tests ingeotechnical engineering ASCE, Special Publication No. 6, Blacksburg Virginia
20. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249-273
21. Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111(12):1425-445 CrossRef
22. Seed RB, Cetin KO, Bray JD, Faris A, Kammerer AM, Kayen RE, Moss RES, Pestana JM, Riemer MF, Sancio RB, Wu J (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework. 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California
23. Sisman E (2006) Liquefaction susceptibili?ty of Fethiye by using SPT and Shear wave velocity measurements. Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, M. Sc. Thesis, Gazi University
24. Suzuki Y, Koyamada K, Tokimatsu K (1997) Prediction of liquefaction resistance based on CPT tip resistance and sleeve friction. Proceedings XIV International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, pp 603-06
25. Tokimatsu K, Yoshimi Y (1983) Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soil Found 23(4):56-4 CrossRef
26. Tosun H, Seyrek E, Orhan A, Savas H, Turkoz M (2011) Soil liquefaction potential in Eski?ehir, NW Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1071-082 CrossRef
27. Turk T, Gumusay U, Tatar O (2012) Creating infrastructure for seismic microzonation by Geographical Information Systems (GIS): a case study in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). Comput Geosci 43:167-76 CrossRef
28. Williams MS (editor), Pomonis A, Booth ED, Vaciago G, Ring S (1993) The Erzincan, Turkey, Earthquake of 13 March 1992: A field report by EEFIT. Earthquake engineering field investigation team, London
29. Yalc?n A, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) Liquefaction severity map for Aksaray city center (Central Anatolia,Turkey). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:641-49 CrossRef
30. Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Liam Finn WD, Harder LF Jr, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Laio SSC, Marcuson WF III, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(10):817-33 CrossRef - 作者单位：E. Subas? Duman (1)
S. B. Ikizler (2)
1. Civil Engineering Department, Gumushane University, Gumushane, 29100, Turkey
2. Civil Engineering Department, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey - ISSN：1573-0840
文摘
One of the most important causes of damages after the earthquakes is the soil liquefaction. Liquefaction can be defined as temporary loss in strength of saturated sandy and silty deposits under transient and cyclic loadings due to excess pore water pressure. This study includes determination of liquefaction potential in Erzincan city center and its vicinity. Due to the proximity of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, in a probable earthquake, Erzincan Province is thought to be affected. In this context, the earthquake scenarios were produced using the empirical expressions. Liquefaction potential for different earthquake magnitudes was determined. These earthquake magnitudes were selected as 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, respectively. Liquefaction potential was investigated using standard penetration test (SPT) data. The first stage of the study, 63 boreholes in different locations was drilled and SPT was performed. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were taken from these boreholes. Laboratory testing was performed to determine physical properties of soil samples, and liquefaction potential analyses were examined using three methods, namely Seed and Idriss (J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249-273, 1971), Tokimatsu and Yoshimi (Soil Found 23(4):56-4, 1983), Iwasaki et al. (Soil liquefaction potential evaluation with use of the simplified procedure. International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, pp 209-14, 1981). In order to complete liquefaction analysis within a short time, MATLAB program was prepared. Liquefaction potential analyses were carried out with the MATLAB program. At the final stage of this study, liquefaction potential maps were prepared for different earthquake magnitudes. The expected results will be shared with the local authorities and important engineering remedial measurements will be proposed to prevent further life losses and to mitigate property losses.