Exploring the Impact of Students-Learning Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Shinyoung Lee ; Eunhee Kang ; Heui-Baik Kim
  • 关键词:Deep learning approach ; Group modeling ; Cognitive collaboration ; Blood circulation
  • 刊名:Journal of Science Education and Technology
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:April 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:24
  • 期:2-3
  • 页码:234-255
  • 全文大小:384 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Acher, A, Arcá, M, Sanmarti, N (2007) Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: a case study in primary education. Sci Educ 91: pp. 398-418 CrossRef
    2. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS
    3. Berland, LK, Reiser, BJ (2009) Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Sci Educ 93: pp. 26-55 CrossRef
    4. Berland, LK, Reiser, BJ (2011) Classroom communities-adaptation of the practice of scientific argumentation. Sci Educ 95: pp. 191-216 CrossRef
    5. Bianchini, JA (1997) Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: pp. 1039-1065 CrossRef
    6. Biggs, J (1993) What do inventories of students-learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol 63: pp. 3-19 CrossRef
    7. B?ttcher, F, Meisert, A (2011) Argumentation in science education: a model-based framework. Sci & Educ 20: pp. 103-140 CrossRef
    8. BouJaoude, SB (1992) The relationship between students-learning strategies and the change in their misunderstandings during a high school chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29: pp. 687-699 CrossRef
    9. Buckley, BC (2000) Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. Int J Sci Educ 22: pp. 895-935 CrossRef
    10. Cano, F (2005) Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. Br J Educ Psychol 75: pp. 203-221 CrossRef
    11. Case, J, Gunstone, R (2002) Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: an in-depth study. Stud High Educ 27: pp. 459-470 CrossRef
    12. Cavallo, AMN, Schafer, LE (1994) Relationships between students-meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31: pp. 393-418 CrossRef
    13. Chi, MTH (2005) Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14: pp. 161-199 CrossRef
    14. Chi, MTH, Slotta, JD, Leeuw, N (1994) Eliciting things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction 4: pp. 27-43 CrossRef
    15. Chin, C, Brown, DE (2000) Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: pp. 109-138 CrossRef
    16. Chin, C, Chia, LG (2004) Problem-based learning: using students-questions to drive knowledge construction. Sci Educ 88: pp. 707-727 CrossRef
    17. Chiou, GL, Liang, JC, Tsai, CC (2012) Undergraduate students-conceptions of and approaches to learning in biology: a study of their structural models and gender differences. Int J Sci Educ 34: pp. 167-195
文摘
This study aimed to explore the effect on group dynamics of statements associated with deep learning approaches (DLA) and their contribution to cognitive collaboration and model development during group modeling of blood circulation. A group was selected for an in-depth analysis of collaborative group modeling. This group constructed a model in a similar fashion to a target model and demonstrated within-group dialogic interaction patterns. It was found that statements associated with DLA contributed to the collaborative group dynamics by providing cognitive scaffolding and enabling critical monitoring, which together facilitated model development and students-participation and understanding. In the model generation phase, the skills demonstrated indicated the use of statements associated with DLA as one student focused on the principles of blood circulation, thereby providing scaffolding for the other students. These students then generated another sub-model. In the model elaboration phase, statements associated with DLA elements such as request information of mechanism (AQ-a) and resolve discrepancies in knowledge (AQ-b) provided students with metacognitive scaffolding and enabled them to show their deep cognitive participation. Moreover, statements associated with DLA elements such as asking questions or metacognitive activity enabled the students to monitor others-models or ideas critically, showing that active cognitive interaction was taking place within the group. These findings reveal that individual learning approaches will bring a synergistic effect to a group modeling process and can lead to practical educational insights for educators seeking to use lessons based on group modeling.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700