参考文献:1. Barberis, N (2000) Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. J Finance 55: pp. 225-264 CrossRef 2. Capozza, DR, Cornell, B (1979) Treasury bill pricing in the spot and futures markets. Rev Econ Stat 61: pp. 513-520 CrossRef 3. Carroll, C, Samwick, A (1997) The nature of precautionary wealth. J Monetary Econ 40: pp. 41-71 CrossRef 4. Cho, Y, Linton, O, Whang, Y (2007) Are there Monday effects in stock returns: a stochastic dominance approach. J Empir Finance 14: pp. 736-755 CrossRef 5. Constantinides, G (1990) Habit formation: a resolution of the equity premium puzzle. J Political Econ 98: pp. 519-543 CrossRef 6. Daniel, K, Marshall, D (1997) Equity-premium and risk-free-rate puzzles at long horizons. Macroecon Dyn 1: pp. 452-484 CrossRef 7. Epstein, L, Zin, S (1991) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: an empirical analysis. J Political Econ 99: pp. 263-286 CrossRef 8. Gil-Bazo, J (2006) Investment horizon effects. J Bus Finance Acc 33: pp. 179-202 CrossRef 9. Handa, P, Kothari, S, Wasley, C (1993) Sensitivity of multivariate tests of the capital asset-pricing model to the return measurement interval. J Finance 48: pp. 1543-1551 CrossRef 10. Hodges, C, Taylor, W, Yoder, J (1997) Stocks, bonds, the sharpe ratio, and the investment horizon. Financial Anal J 53: pp. 74-80 CrossRef 11. Hodges, C, Yoder, J (1996) Time diversification and security preferences: a stochastic dominance analysis. Rev Quant Finance Acc 7: pp. 289-298 CrossRef 12. Kim, C (2009) Test for spatial dominances in the distribution of stock returns: evidence from the Korean stock market before and after the East Asian financial crisis. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 13: pp. 1-27 13. Lee, W (1990) Diversification and time: Do investment horizons matter?. J Portfolio Manag 16: pp. 21-26 CrossRef 14. Levhari, D, Levy, H (1977) The capital asset pricing model and the investment horizon. Rev Econ Stat 59: pp. 92-104 CrossRef 15. Levy H (1973) Stochastic dominance, efficiency criteria, and efficient portfolios: the multi-period case. Am Econ Rev 63(5):986鈥?94 16. Levy, H, Paroush, J (1974) Multi-period stochastic dominance. Manag Sci 21: pp. 428-435 CrossRef 17. Levy, H, Paroush, J (1974) Toward multivariate efficiency criteria. J Econ Theory 7: pp. 129-142 CrossRef 18. Lewis, KK (1991) Should the holding period matter for the intertemporal consumption-based CAPM?. J Monetary Econ 28: pp. 365-389 CrossRef 19. Lim, G, Maasoumi, E, Martin, V (2006) A reexamination of the equity-premium puzzle: a robust non-parametric approach. N Am J Econ Finance 17: pp. 173-189 CrossRef 20. Linton, O, Maasoumi, E, Whang, Y (2005) Consistent testing for stochastic dominance under general sampling schemes. Rev Econ Stud 72: pp. 735-765 CrossRef 21. Lloyd, W, Haney, R (1980) Time diversification. J Portfolio Manag 6: pp. 5-9 CrossRef 22. Lloyd, W, Modani, N (1983) Stocks, bonds, bills, and time diversification. J Portfolio Manag 9: pp. 7-11 CrossRef 23. McFadden, D (1989) Studies in the economics of uncertainty. Springer, New York 24. Mehra R (2003) The equity premium: Why is it a puzzle? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research 25. Mehra, R, Prescott, E (2003) Handbook of the economics of finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam 26. Mehra, R, Prescott, E (1985) The equity premium: a puzzle. J Monetary Econ 15: pp. 145-161 CrossRef 27. Merton, R (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41: pp. 867-887 CrossRef 28. Park J (2007) The spatial analysis of time series. In proceedings of the FEMES Meetings, Beijing 29. Parker, JA, Julliard, C (2005) Consumption risk and the cross section of expected returns. J Political Econ 113: pp. 185-222 CrossRef 30. Politis, D, Romano, J, Wolf, M (1999) Subsampling. Springer Verlag, Berlin 31. Post, T (2003) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J Finance 58: pp. 1905-1932 CrossRef 32. Thorley, S (1955) The time-diversification controversy. Financial Anal J 51: pp. 68-76 CrossRef
刊物主题:Econometrics; Statistics for Business/Economics/Mathematical Finance/Insurance; Economic Theory;
出版者:Springer Berlin Heidelberg
ISSN:1435-8921
文摘
This paper studies the adequate size of equity premium over different investment horizons based on spatial dominance. We find that the puzzle with respect to the size of equity premium disappears as investment horizons get longer in terms of the spatial dominance; therefore, the adequate size of equity premium should be dependent upon the investment horizon.