Inelastic shears in ductile RC walls of mid-rise wall-frame buildings and comparison to Eurocode 8

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kyriakos Antoniou ; Georgios Tsionis…
• 关键词：Concrete walls ; Eurocode 8 ; Fragility curves ; Higher modes ; Nonlinear response history analysis ; Seismic design ; Seismic shear ; Wall ; frame buildings
• 刊名：Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：13
• 期：3
• 页码：841-869
• 全文大小：8,673 KB
• 参考文献：1. Antoniou K (2013) Seismic fragility of RC frame and wall-frame (dual) buildings designed to EN-Eurocodes. MSc Thesis, University of Patras, Greece
  2. Antoniou K, Tsionis G, Fardis MN (2014) Seismic fragility of concrete buildings. In: Proceedings, 4th / fib Congress, Mumbai, paper 62
  3. Biskinis DE, Fardis MN (2010a) Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr 11(2):93-08 CrossRef
  4. Biskinis DE, Fardis MN (2010b) Deformations at flexural yielding of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr 11(3):127-38
  5. Biskinis DE, Roupakias G, Fardis MN (2004) Degradation of shear strength of RC members with inelastic cyclic displacements. ACI Struct J 101(6):773-83
  6. Blakeley RWG, Cooney RC, Megget LM (1975) Seismic shear loading at flexural capacity in cantilever wall structures. Bull New Zealand Nat Soc Earthq Eng 8(4):278-90
  7. Eibl J, Keintzel E (1988) Seismic shear forces in RC cantilever shear walls. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, vol 6, pp 5-0
  8. CEN (1994) ENV 1998-1-2:1994 Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures–part 1-: general rules, general rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
  9. CEN (2004) EN 1998-:2004 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions, rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
  10. CEN (2005) EN 1998-:2005 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance–part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
  11. Fardis MN, Papailia A, Tsionis G (2012) Seismic fragility of RC framed and wall-frame buildings designed to the EN-Eurocodes. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1767-793 CrossRef
  12. Kappos AJ, Antoniadis P (2007) A contribution to seismic shear design of RC walls in dual structures. Bull Earthq Eng 5(3):443-66 CrossRef
  13. Kappos AJ, Antoniadis PS (2010) An improved procedure for the seismic design of reinforced concrete walls in dual systems. In: Proceedings, 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, Ohrid, MK
  14. Keintzel E (1990) Seismic design shear forces in RC cantilever shear wall structures. European J Earthq Eng 3:7-6
  15. Kosmopoulos A, Fardis MN (2008) Simple models for inelastic seismic analysis of asymmetric multistory buildings. J Earthq Eng 12(5):704-27 CrossRef
  16. Otani S (1974) Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures. ASCE J Struct Div 100(ST7):1433-449
  17. Priestley N, Amaris A (2003) Dynamic amplification of seismic moments and shear forces in cantilever walls. In: Proceedings, / fib symposium concrete structures in seismic regions, Athens, paper 293
  18. Rejec K, Isakovi? T, Fischinger M (2012) Seismic shear force magnification in RC cantilever structural walls, designed according to Eurocode 8. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):567-86 CrossRef
  19. Rutenberg A (2004) The seismic shear of ductile cantilever wall systems in multistorey structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(7):881-96 CrossRef
  20. Rutenberg A (2013) Seismic shear forces on RC walls: review and bibliography. Bull Earthq Eng 11(5):1727-751 CrossRef
  21. Rutenberg A, Nsieri E (2006) The seismic shear demand in ductile cantilever wall systems and the EC8 provisions. Bull Earthq Eng 4(1):1-1 CrossRef
  22. Rutenberg A, Nsieri E (2010) On the seismic shear demand in ductile RC dual systems. In: Proceedings, 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Toronto
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Earth sciences
  Geotechnical Engineering
  Civil Engineering
  Geophysics and Geodesy
  Hydrogeology
  Structural Geology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1456

文摘

Nonlinear response-history analyses (NLRHA) are performed for 16 five- or eight-storey prototype regular reinforced concrete wall-frame (“dual- buildings designed to Eurocode 8 for ductility class (DC) M (Medium) or H (High), in order to evaluate the higher-mode inelastic magnification of shear forces in the walls. The percentage of the total base shear taken by the walls in the 16 buildings covers evenly a range from 37 to 90?%. The NLRHA results show that there is indeed post-elastic amplification of wall shear forces due to higher modes, but that it is overestimated by the current approach for DC H in Eurocode 8. A recently proposed rational modification of that approach, which suits better modal response spectrum analysis (MRSA), is also evaluated; it is found to be in better overall agreement with NLRHA in an analysis context, but, in general, to underestimate inelastic shears above the ground storey in a design context. The design envelope of wall shears in “dual-buildings prescribed in Eurocode 8 is found to cover such shortfalls; it should be extended to wall systems as well, even in case the current approach in Eurocode 8 is modified per the recent, more rational proposals. The current design envelope of wall moments in Eurocode 8 does not safeguard against plastic hinging at upper levels; even if the linear design envelope is anchored to the moment resistance of the base section, instead of the moment from elastic analysis with the design (i.e., reduced) spectrum, it does not preclude flexural plastic hinging in upper storeys. Although for the design of walls safe-sided envelopes and approximations may be appropriate, for the purposes of evaluation of seismic performance and vulnerability of walls, NLRHA seems to be the only means to estimate with certain confidence the post-elastic higher mode effects on wall shears.